{ "errata_schema_version": 1, "generated": "2026-09-07", "applies_to": { "file": "eoa_editions_archive_2026-09-06.jsonl.gz", "sha256": "e4603964f675fcd020f71fc7d91736c069d4dfacfcb3c10bba5504ea1c5dd558", "bytes": 125863460, "records": 18561, "sealed_at_publish": "2026-09-06", "note": "This errata describes the SEALED archive. Because the edition history is append-only, the same 37 editions also persist byte-identically inside the live editions_archive.jsonl.gz at the same offsets, so every finding here applies there too. The difference is forward-looking only: the live archive gains corrected editions from the first publish after 2026-09-07, while this file stops at the 2026-09-06 publish." }, "defects": [ { "id": "parent_in_child-schema-token-in-edge-reason", "severity": "cosmetic", "summary": "A bare internal schema token, `parent_in_child`, appears mid-sentence in reader-facing DAG-edge explanation prose.", "field_path": "canonical_content_snapshot.parts.dag_edges[].reason", "entity_count": 17, "edition_count": 37, "occurrence_count": 56, "what_it_was": "`parent_in_child` is the sole legal value of `part_direction`, a proof sub-field of the DAG review records. It is not a property of the published relation schema and no corpus edge carries it as a key. It was concatenated into `reason` during an earlier promotion.", "reader_impact": "The token rendered verbatim inside the edge-proof text on entity pages. It carries no meaning a reader needs: every affected edge is composition/part_of, which already states that the parent is a constituent of the child.", "corrected_in_corpus": "2026-09-07", "correction": "The bare token was deleted and all surrounding prose preserved. `corrected_reason` below is the exact resulting text.", "why_this_archive_was_not_repaired": "Each edition's stored `content_hash` is a SHA-256 over its part hashes, and `dag_edges` is a hashed part. Editing the prose in place would either leave 37 editions whose stored hashes no longer verify, or require recomputing hashes — forging a hash for content that was never published and desyncing the prior_content_hash chain. A published record is kept as published.", "affected_entities": [ "domain_specific:baldwin_effect", "domain_specific:base_rate_fallacy", "domain_specific:black_elephant", "domain_specific:conjunction_fallacy", "domain_specific:elaboration_likelihood", "domain_specific:gamblers_fallacy", "domain_specific:haldanes_rule", "domain_specific:human_factors_analysis_and_classification_system", "domain_specific:mixed_use_development", "domain_specific:peripheral_route_processing", "domain_specific:pharmacological_interaction", "domain_specific:transport_convergence_zone", "prime:empirical_no_failure_anchor", "prime:external_analytic_challenge", "prime:inquiry_change_learning_loop", "prime:law_of_large_numbers", "prime:template_instantiation" ], "affected_editions": [ { "archive_line": 1212, "typed_id": "domain_specific:baldwin_effect", "slug": "baldwin_effect", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Baldwin Effect", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "3ab86f488b27e6e6ddc95653a57597443034e6b36c406f6cf24efc177bbaa43c", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:selection_visibility_gate", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "conditional", "published_reason": "In the exposure branch of Baldwin dynamics, plastic expression makes otherwise latent heritable acquisition differences visible to selection. When plasticity exposes rather than shields variation, removing expression of the acquired phenotype prevents selection from differentiating genotypes by the cost or reliability of producing it. parent_in_child Applies to the exposure regime in which plasticity holds the phenotype under selection; plastic buffering can instead shield genetic differences, and the Baldwin source remains blocked on its coordinated split with genetic assimilation.", "corrected_reason": "In the exposure branch of Baldwin dynamics, plastic expression makes otherwise latent heritable acquisition differences visible to selection. When plasticity exposes rather than shields variation, removing expression of the acquired phenotype prevents selection from differentiating genotypes by the cost or reliability of producing it. Applies to the exposure regime in which plasticity holds the phenotype under selection; plastic buffering can instead shield genetic differences, and the Baldwin source remains blocked on its coordinated split with genetic assimilation." } ] }, { "archive_line": 17705, "typed_id": "domain_specific:baldwin_effect", "slug": "baldwin_effect", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Baldwin Effect", "version": 2, "version_date": "2026-09-06", "content_hash": "5ee557aa7ecc4a88e24a70070041da9e0e2bb971c2a5f5cf0bd16699ad751670", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:selection_visibility_gate", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "conditional", "published_reason": "In the exposure branch of Baldwin dynamics, plastic expression makes otherwise latent heritable acquisition differences visible to selection. When plasticity exposes rather than shields variation, removing expression of the acquired phenotype prevents selection from differentiating genotypes by the cost or reliability of producing it. parent_in_child Applies to the exposure regime in which plasticity holds the phenotype under selection; plastic buffering can instead shield genetic differences, and the Baldwin source remains blocked on its coordinated split with genetic assimilation.", "corrected_reason": "In the exposure branch of Baldwin dynamics, plastic expression makes otherwise latent heritable acquisition differences visible to selection. When plasticity exposes rather than shields variation, removing expression of the acquired phenotype prevents selection from differentiating genotypes by the cost or reliability of producing it. Applies to the exposure regime in which plasticity holds the phenotype under selection; plastic buffering can instead shield genetic differences, and the Baldwin source remains blocked on its coordinated split with genetic assimilation." } ] }, { "archive_line": 1217, "typed_id": "domain_specific:base_rate_fallacy", "slug": "base_rate_fallacy", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Base Rate Fallacy", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "472853f17970263c2c7dbbf171c965a69492df18de79029262d75e8084f37524", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "domain_specific:representativeness_heuristic", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Base-rate fallacy contains representativeness because resemblance or vivid likelihood evidence supplies the proxy estimate that displaces the prior. Remove the typicality-for-probability substitution from the live child and vivid evidence no longer explains why the posterior tracks the likelihood while the known prior drops out. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Base-rate fallacy contains representativeness because resemblance or vivid likelihood evidence supplies the proxy estimate that displaces the prior. Remove the typicality-for-probability substitution from the live child and vivid evidence no longer explains why the posterior tracks the likelihood while the known prior drops out." } ] }, { "archive_line": 1245, "typed_id": "domain_specific:black_elephant", "slug": "black_elephant", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Black Elephant", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "23c3ef4a36b870e7e7c93a30c66b55050f8c0e38c3847d2d536c7043db573bcc", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:motivated_reasoning", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Motivated Reasoning is a constitutive part of Black Elephant. The live Black Elephant identity is a recurrent assembly whose rationalization layer lets status-quo beneficiaries discount or reinterpret already-known risk. Remove that layer and other components remain, but the full performed-surprise and collective-deferral configuration does not. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Motivated Reasoning is a constitutive part of Black Elephant. The live Black Elephant identity is a recurrent assembly whose rationalization layer lets status-quo beneficiaries discount or reinterpret already-known risk. Remove that layer and other components remain, but the full performed-surprise and collective-deferral configuration does not." } ] }, { "archive_line": 1332, "typed_id": "domain_specific:conjunction_fallacy", "slug": "conjunction_fallacy", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Conjunction Fallacy", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "0ab8c1a8866fc84030134ab0473bc91f5d1f392e08965e4d3c4d97964f438ce6", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "domain_specific:representativeness_heuristic", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Conjunction fallacy contains representativeness because the more stereotype-matching scenario is ranked by resemblance instead of probability. Remove resemblance-for-probability substitution and representative detail has no mechanism for raising a strict subset above the event containing it. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Conjunction fallacy contains representativeness because the more stereotype-matching scenario is ranked by resemblance instead of probability. Remove resemblance-for-probability substitution and representative detail has no mechanism for raising a strict subset above the event containing it." } ] }, { "archive_line": 1455, "typed_id": "domain_specific:elaboration_likelihood", "slug": "elaboration_likelihood", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Elaboration Likelihood", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "c40b1b55581fcbd149293d895fd7e762b3210cbeb5cd428be3380d2c6e17e201", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "domain_specific:peripheral_route_processing", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "ELM contains peripheral-route processing as one of its two defining pathways, selected whenever recipient motivation or ability is insufficient for central scrutiny. Remove the cue-driven branch and ELM loses half of its route selector, its explanation of low-elaboration persuasion, and the central-versus-peripheral durability contrast. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "ELM contains peripheral-route processing as one of its two defining pathways, selected whenever recipient motivation or ability is insufficient for central scrutiny. Remove the cue-driven branch and ELM loses half of its route selector, its explanation of low-elaboration persuasion, and the central-versus-peripheral durability contrast." } ] }, { "archive_line": 1573, "typed_id": "domain_specific:gamblers_fallacy", "slug": "gamblers_fallacy", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Gambler's Fallacy", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "5aad54baad7ed0ff50230568182a68ef57a76792f3a5bbfeff1590508df0fbb0", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "domain_specific:representativeness_heuristic", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Gambler's fallacy contains representativeness because a short streak that looks unlike the expected long-run pattern is treated as evidence that reversal is due. Remove the expectation that a short sequence should resemble its source distribution and the observed imbalance no longer creates a balancing obligation for the next independent trial. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Gambler's fallacy contains representativeness because a short streak that looks unlike the expected long-run pattern is treated as evidence that reversal is due. Remove the expectation that a short sequence should resemble its source distribution and the observed imbalance no longer creates a balancing obligation for the next independent trial." }, { "parent": "prime:law_of_large_numbers", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Gambler's fallacy contains a misapplied law-of-large-numbers intuition, turning asymptotic aggregate convergence into a finite next-trial obligation. Remove the expectation that long-run frequencies must be enforced by short-run correction and a streak supplies no reason for the opposite outcome to feel due under independence. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Gambler's fallacy contains a misapplied law-of-large-numbers intuition, turning asymptotic aggregate convergence into a finite next-trial obligation. Remove the expectation that long-run frequencies must be enforced by short-run correction and a streak supplies no reason for the opposite outcome to feel due under independence." } ] }, { "archive_line": 1613, "typed_id": "domain_specific:haldanes_rule", "slug": "haldanes_rule", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Haldane's Rule", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "1cc53c8862cc053d09acb6f94faf6ff2f5d3b4ad5e75c052e1d905f731b20fab", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "domain_specific:hemizygosity_exposure", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "conditional", "published_reason": "Under the dominance hypothesis, Haldane's rule contains hemizygosity exposure because the heterogametic hybrid sex cannot mask recessive X- or Z-linked incompatibilities. In dominance-mechanism cases, restore a homologous masking allele and the heterogametic sex loses the unbuffered expression difference that predicts its disproportionate sterility or inviability. parent_in_child Applies to the dominance-hypothesis contribution. Faster-male and faster-X routes are non-exclusive alternatives, so hemizygosity exposure is not a strict constituent of every case and not the rule's genus.", "corrected_reason": "Under the dominance hypothesis, Haldane's rule contains hemizygosity exposure because the heterogametic hybrid sex cannot mask recessive X- or Z-linked incompatibilities. In dominance-mechanism cases, restore a homologous masking allele and the heterogametic sex loses the unbuffered expression difference that predicts its disproportionate sterility or inviability. Applies to the dominance-hypothesis contribution. Faster-male and faster-X routes are non-exclusive alternatives, so hemizygosity exposure is not a strict constituent of every case and not the rule's genus." } ] }, { "archive_line": 1646, "typed_id": "domain_specific:human_factors_analysis_and_classification_system", "slug": "human_factors_analysis_and_classification_system", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Human Factors Analysis and Classification System", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "830390ccd1cd5574bc65d35a23387a6394e8603e89e73302537b204a227373b9", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "domain_specific:active_failure", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Active failure supplies the sharp-end unsafe-act constituent stratum of the staged HFACS whole. Remove the sharp-end act stratum and the taxonomy has no visible event whose upstream causal layers it was built to reclassify and trace. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Active failure supplies the sharp-end unsafe-act constituent stratum of the staged HFACS whole. Remove the sharp-end act stratum and the taxonomy has no visible event whose upstream causal layers it was built to reclassify and trace." }, { "parent": "domain_specific:organizational_influence_failure", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Organizational influence failure is the apex constituent stratum of HFACS. Remove the organizational-influence apex and HFACS loses its defined top and its resource, climate, and process intervention layer. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Organizational influence failure is the apex constituent stratum of HFACS. Remove the organizational-influence apex and HFACS loses its defined top and its resource, climate, and process intervention layer." }, { "parent": "domain_specific:precondition_for_unsafe_act", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Preconditions for unsafe acts are the third constituent stratum of HFACS. Remove the precondition stratum and HFACS can no longer separate the operator's immediate probability-shifting state from the act itself. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Preconditions for unsafe acts are the third constituent stratum of HFACS. Remove the precondition stratum and HFACS can no longer separate the operator's immediate probability-shifting state from the act itself." }, { "parent": "domain_specific:unsafe_supervision", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Unsafe supervision is the second constituent stratum of HFACS. Remove unsafe supervision and the framework jumps directly from organization-wide decisions to operator state, erasing its supervisory transmission layer. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Unsafe supervision is the second constituent stratum of HFACS. Remove unsafe supervision and the framework jumps directly from organization-wide decisions to operator state, erasing its supervisory transmission layer." } ] }, { "archive_line": 14636, "typed_id": "domain_specific:human_factors_analysis_and_classification_system", "slug": "human_factors_analysis_and_classification_system", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Human Factors Analysis and Classification System", "version": 2, "version_date": "2026-08-30", "content_hash": "a82c0d4db50bf097a23f359bae7a9be0126143227db3597a0b12f630327f3a69", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "domain_specific:active_failure", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Active failure supplies the sharp-end unsafe-act constituent stratum of the staged HFACS whole. Remove the sharp-end act stratum and the taxonomy has no visible event whose upstream causal layers it was built to reclassify and trace. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Active failure supplies the sharp-end unsafe-act constituent stratum of the staged HFACS whole. Remove the sharp-end act stratum and the taxonomy has no visible event whose upstream causal layers it was built to reclassify and trace." }, { "parent": "domain_specific:organizational_influence_failure", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Organizational influence failure is the apex constituent stratum of HFACS. Remove the organizational-influence apex and HFACS loses its defined top and its resource, climate, and process intervention layer. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Organizational influence failure is the apex constituent stratum of HFACS. Remove the organizational-influence apex and HFACS loses its defined top and its resource, climate, and process intervention layer." }, { "parent": "domain_specific:precondition_for_unsafe_act", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Preconditions for unsafe acts are the third constituent stratum of HFACS. Remove the precondition stratum and HFACS can no longer separate the operator's immediate probability-shifting state from the act itself. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Preconditions for unsafe acts are the third constituent stratum of HFACS. Remove the precondition stratum and HFACS can no longer separate the operator's immediate probability-shifting state from the act itself." }, { "parent": "domain_specific:unsafe_supervision", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Unsafe supervision is the second constituent stratum of HFACS. Remove unsafe supervision and the framework jumps directly from organization-wide decisions to operator state, erasing its supervisory transmission layer. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Unsafe supervision is the second constituent stratum of HFACS. Remove unsafe supervision and the framework jumps directly from organization-wide decisions to operator state, erasing its supervisory transmission layer." } ] }, { "archive_line": 1842, "typed_id": "domain_specific:mixed_use_development", "slug": "mixed_use_development", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Mixed-Use Development", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "7e001a10a9ec17305acbf9b827180ef58bbc190dc64d8b53a932fe7ff277b7ec", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:co_location", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Mixed-use development contains co-location because its distinct land uses must occupy one building, block, corridor, or district during overlapping daily cycles. Separate every use into a different non-overlapping district and the development becomes single-use zoning at each place, losing the mixed-use identity. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Mixed-use development contains co-location because its distinct land uses must occupy one building, block, corridor, or district during overlapping daily cycles. Separate every use into a different non-overlapping district and the development becomes single-use zoning at each place, losing the mixed-use identity." } ] }, { "archive_line": 1965, "typed_id": "domain_specific:peripheral_route_processing", "slug": "peripheral_route_processing", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Peripheral Route Processing", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "13d6458a0deda9d673e9e5d0ac076dfd72bf890eb1cb43927a8258f89ee8ff4c", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "domain_specific:source_credibility", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "typical", "published_reason": "Peripheral-route processing commonly contains source-credibility weighting as an expertise, trustworthiness, or goodwill cue, but can instead ride message length, attractiveness, familiarity, or affect. In source-cued peripheral persuasion, remove the receiver's credibility weighting and the source's apparent expertise or trustworthiness no longer moves attitude uptake. parent_in_child Source credibility is present when the peripheral cue is attached to the communicator; message-, channel-, familiarity-, or affect-based peripheral processing can omit it.", "corrected_reason": "Peripheral-route processing commonly contains source-credibility weighting as an expertise, trustworthiness, or goodwill cue, but can instead ride message length, attractiveness, familiarity, or affect. In source-cued peripheral persuasion, remove the receiver's credibility weighting and the source's apparent expertise or trustworthiness no longer moves attitude uptake. Source credibility is present when the peripheral cue is attached to the communicator; message-, channel-, familiarity-, or affect-based peripheral processing can omit it." } ] }, { "archive_line": 14642, "typed_id": "domain_specific:peripheral_route_processing", "slug": "peripheral_route_processing", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Peripheral Route Processing", "version": 2, "version_date": "2026-08-30", "content_hash": "d2ad958db7b5448ca9274699e9807f379c524e8b8ff86b040190b142a2e61c8a", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "domain_specific:source_credibility", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "typical", "published_reason": "Peripheral-route processing commonly contains source-credibility weighting as an expertise, trustworthiness, or goodwill cue, but can instead ride message length, attractiveness, familiarity, or affect. In source-cued peripheral persuasion, remove the receiver's credibility weighting and the source's apparent expertise or trustworthiness no longer moves attitude uptake. parent_in_child Source credibility is present when the peripheral cue is attached to the communicator; message-, channel-, familiarity-, or affect-based peripheral processing can omit it.", "corrected_reason": "Peripheral-route processing commonly contains source-credibility weighting as an expertise, trustworthiness, or goodwill cue, but can instead ride message length, attractiveness, familiarity, or affect. In source-cued peripheral persuasion, remove the receiver's credibility weighting and the source's apparent expertise or trustworthiness no longer moves attitude uptake. Source credibility is present when the peripheral cue is attached to the communicator; message-, channel-, familiarity-, or affect-based peripheral processing can omit it." } ] }, { "archive_line": 1970, "typed_id": "domain_specific:pharmacological_interaction", "slug": "pharmacological_interaction", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Pharmacological Interaction", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "eda4f5db6f3d494b26f2ea95adb62904b93cbde0ec0f7c0a52a4274f5e0eddae", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:synergy_and_antagonism", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "typical", "published_reason": "Synergy And Antagonism is a constitutive part of Pharmacological Interaction. In the canonical response-changing cases, remove the no-interaction baseline and the signed departure of joint exposure or effect from that baseline, and amplifying versus attenuating interaction cannot be stated. parent_in_child Applies when a pharmacodynamic effect or an exposure measure is interpreted as supra- or sub-baseline. A measured concentration shift may meet the pharmacokinetic interaction identity while producing no detectable clinical endpoint departure in a flat response region.", "corrected_reason": "Synergy And Antagonism is a constitutive part of Pharmacological Interaction. In the canonical response-changing cases, remove the no-interaction baseline and the signed departure of joint exposure or effect from that baseline, and amplifying versus attenuating interaction cannot be stated. Applies when a pharmacodynamic effect or an exposure measure is interpreted as supra- or sub-baseline. A measured concentration shift may meet the pharmacokinetic interaction identity while producing no detectable clinical endpoint departure in a flat response region." } ] }, { "archive_line": 14643, "typed_id": "domain_specific:pharmacological_interaction", "slug": "pharmacological_interaction", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Pharmacological Interaction", "version": 2, "version_date": "2026-08-30", "content_hash": "2a123ffef7a178e857ab6e73ded3b07aa03d525cdfd9ca48f270d332b89acb1f", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:synergy_and_antagonism", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "typical", "published_reason": "Synergy And Antagonism is a constitutive part of Pharmacological Interaction. In the canonical response-changing cases, remove the no-interaction baseline and the signed departure of joint exposure or effect from that baseline, and amplifying versus attenuating interaction cannot be stated. parent_in_child Applies when a pharmacodynamic effect or an exposure measure is interpreted as supra- or sub-baseline. A measured concentration shift may meet the pharmacokinetic interaction identity while producing no detectable clinical endpoint departure in a flat response region.", "corrected_reason": "Synergy And Antagonism is a constitutive part of Pharmacological Interaction. In the canonical response-changing cases, remove the no-interaction baseline and the signed departure of joint exposure or effect from that baseline, and amplifying versus attenuating interaction cannot be stated. Applies when a pharmacodynamic effect or an exposure measure is interpreted as supra- or sub-baseline. A measured concentration shift may meet the pharmacokinetic interaction identity while producing no detectable clinical endpoint departure in a flat response region." } ] }, { "archive_line": 2264, "typed_id": "domain_specific:transport_convergence_zone", "slug": "transport_convergence_zone", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Transport Convergence Zone", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "28330a602f2565f4806ff63680ed452585c37ba084d41e608b34c0124bd1bc08", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:accumulation", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "A transport convergence zone contains accumulation because delivery into the region persistently exceeds export or removal and builds a localized stock. Equalize delivery and export so no local stock or concentration can build and the feature ceases to be a material convergence zone rather than merely a streamline meeting. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "A transport convergence zone contains accumulation because delivery into the region persistently exceeds export or removal and builds a localized stock. Equalize delivery and export so no local stock or concentration can build and the feature ceases to be a material convergence zone rather than merely a streamline meeting." } ] }, { "archive_line": 14657, "typed_id": "domain_specific:transport_convergence_zone", "slug": "transport_convergence_zone", "type": "domain_specific", "name": "Transport Convergence Zone", "version": 2, "version_date": "2026-08-30", "content_hash": "af182454b8c8b0a09d5a029128acbb2949fd5ad5e0deadc23fadf09e471ef5ed", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:accumulation", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "A transport convergence zone contains accumulation because delivery into the region persistently exceeds export or removal and builds a localized stock. Equalize delivery and export so no local stock or concentration can build and the feature ceases to be a material convergence zone rather than merely a streamline meeting. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "A transport convergence zone contains accumulation because delivery into the region persistently exceeds export or removal and builds a localized stock. Equalize delivery and export so no local stock or concentration can build and the feature ceases to be a material convergence zone rather than merely a streamline meeting." } ] }, { "archive_line": 12635, "typed_id": "prime:empirical_no_failure_anchor", "slug": "empirical_no_failure_anchor", "type": "prime", "name": "Empirical No-Failure Anchor", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "9f461e5cd66dcd44aab874ba9a7ed6fe7a6837841facf458da4f6fac8fb9282d", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The anchor contains a null finding whose boundary force exists only through the test apparatus's probability of detecting a present failure. Remove the detection-side counterfactual and a passed level can no longer constrain the failure boundary; it becomes an uninterpretable silence rather than an empirical no-failure anchor. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The anchor contains a null finding whose boundary force exists only through the test apparatus's probability of detecting a present failure. Remove the detection-side counterfactual and a passed level can no longer constrain the failure boundary; it becomes an uninterpretable silence rather than an empirical no-failure anchor." } ] }, { "archive_line": 13612, "typed_id": "prime:empirical_no_failure_anchor", "slug": "empirical_no_failure_anchor", "type": "prime", "name": "Empirical No-Failure Anchor", "version": 2, "version_date": "2026-08-27", "content_hash": "28fc131802d5d023a3a5d38e4831698c8680728dc800301627b898e5925b77ba", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The anchor contains a null finding whose boundary force exists only through the test apparatus's probability of detecting a present failure. Remove the detection-side counterfactual and a passed level can no longer constrain the failure boundary; it becomes an uninterpretable silence rather than an empirical no-failure anchor. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The anchor contains a null finding whose boundary force exists only through the test apparatus's probability of detecting a present failure. Remove the detection-side counterfactual and a passed level can no longer constrain the failure boundary; it becomes an uninterpretable silence rather than an empirical no-failure anchor." } ] }, { "archive_line": 13645, "typed_id": "prime:empirical_no_failure_anchor", "slug": "empirical_no_failure_anchor", "type": "prime", "name": "Empirical No-Failure Anchor", "version": 3, "version_date": "2026-08-28", "content_hash": "2fb90eb3e613933f0adc094102c7acb39493c379078745cbef9bc7f43ef7d075", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The anchor contains a null finding whose boundary force exists only through the test apparatus's probability of detecting a present failure. Remove the detection-side counterfactual and a passed level can no longer constrain the failure boundary; it becomes an uninterpretable silence rather than an empirical no-failure anchor. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The anchor contains a null finding whose boundary force exists only through the test apparatus's probability of detecting a present failure. Remove the detection-side counterfactual and a passed level can no longer constrain the failure boundary; it becomes an uninterpretable silence rather than an empirical no-failure anchor." } ] }, { "archive_line": 14775, "typed_id": "prime:empirical_no_failure_anchor", "slug": "empirical_no_failure_anchor", "type": "prime", "name": "Empirical No-Failure Anchor", "version": 4, "version_date": "2026-08-30", "content_hash": "13cf2b368fd62f15497af314e497fb85cdaef65bf3de1e9c3db14f131a28d0b6", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The anchor contains a null finding whose boundary force exists only through the test apparatus's probability of detecting a present failure. Remove the detection-side counterfactual and a passed level can no longer constrain the failure boundary; it becomes an uninterpretable silence rather than an empirical no-failure anchor. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The anchor contains a null finding whose boundary force exists only through the test apparatus's probability of detecting a present failure. Remove the detection-side counterfactual and a passed level can no longer constrain the failure boundary; it becomes an uninterpretable silence rather than an empirical no-failure anchor." } ] }, { "archive_line": 12691, "typed_id": "prime:external_analytic_challenge", "slug": "external_analytic_challenge", "type": "prime", "name": "External Analytic Challenge", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "abb586e39ef57cbbfa5b1504d04a0beb38e2cd4c02ca07c65b7b6e1650d6f47a", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:feedback", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "External analytic challenge contains feedback because its probes must return to alter or explicitly re-justify the next state of the work. Cut the challenge-to-response return path and the outsider can comment but cannot correct the work; the structure becomes observation or later judgment rather than pre-commitment challenge. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "External analytic challenge contains feedback because its probes must return to alter or explicitly re-justify the next state of the work. Cut the challenge-to-response return path and the outsider can comment but cannot correct the work; the structure becomes observation or later judgment rather than pre-commitment challenge." }, { "parent": "prime:viewpoint", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "External analytic challenge contains viewpoint because the challenger must occupy a station whose access, occlusion, and bias profile differ from the authoring frame. Remove the differently positioned station and a challenger sharing the same accumulated access and blind spots cannot provide the outside-frame correction the identity requires. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "External analytic challenge contains viewpoint because the challenger must occupy a station whose access, occlusion, and bias profile differ from the authoring frame. Remove the differently positioned station and a challenger sharing the same accumulated access and blind spots cannot provide the outside-frame correction the identity requires." } ] }, { "archive_line": 13614, "typed_id": "prime:external_analytic_challenge", "slug": "external_analytic_challenge", "type": "prime", "name": "External Analytic Challenge", "version": 2, "version_date": "2026-08-27", "content_hash": "93c63584c8473e873df953a7c96ec3e8457bf08d42d2ea2d26a3894da89d8464", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:feedback", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "External analytic challenge contains feedback because its probes must return to alter or explicitly re-justify the next state of the work. Cut the challenge-to-response return path and the outsider can comment but cannot correct the work; the structure becomes observation or later judgment rather than pre-commitment challenge. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "External analytic challenge contains feedback because its probes must return to alter or explicitly re-justify the next state of the work. Cut the challenge-to-response return path and the outsider can comment but cannot correct the work; the structure becomes observation or later judgment rather than pre-commitment challenge." }, { "parent": "prime:viewpoint", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "External analytic challenge contains viewpoint because the challenger must occupy a station whose access, occlusion, and bias profile differ from the authoring frame. Remove the differently positioned station and a challenger sharing the same accumulated access and blind spots cannot provide the outside-frame correction the identity requires. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "External analytic challenge contains viewpoint because the challenger must occupy a station whose access, occlusion, and bias profile differ from the authoring frame. Remove the differently positioned station and a challenger sharing the same accumulated access and blind spots cannot provide the outside-frame correction the identity requires." } ] }, { "archive_line": 13647, "typed_id": "prime:external_analytic_challenge", "slug": "external_analytic_challenge", "type": "prime", "name": "External Analytic Challenge", "version": 3, "version_date": "2026-08-28", "content_hash": "e271b6add87d891e0a1aee2bb1d77881aa187e3820ec85cf44608c461780e4ef", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:feedback", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "External analytic challenge contains feedback because its probes must return to alter or explicitly re-justify the next state of the work. Cut the challenge-to-response return path and the outsider can comment but cannot correct the work; the structure becomes observation or later judgment rather than pre-commitment challenge. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "External analytic challenge contains feedback because its probes must return to alter or explicitly re-justify the next state of the work. Cut the challenge-to-response return path and the outsider can comment but cannot correct the work; the structure becomes observation or later judgment rather than pre-commitment challenge." }, { "parent": "prime:viewpoint", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "External analytic challenge contains viewpoint because the challenger must occupy a station whose access, occlusion, and bias profile differ from the authoring frame. Remove the differently positioned station and a challenger sharing the same accumulated access and blind spots cannot provide the outside-frame correction the identity requires. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "External analytic challenge contains viewpoint because the challenger must occupy a station whose access, occlusion, and bias profile differ from the authoring frame. Remove the differently positioned station and a challenger sharing the same accumulated access and blind spots cannot provide the outside-frame correction the identity requires." } ] }, { "archive_line": 14791, "typed_id": "prime:external_analytic_challenge", "slug": "external_analytic_challenge", "type": "prime", "name": "External Analytic Challenge", "version": 4, "version_date": "2026-08-30", "content_hash": "67594e197a7d69db846393b288bd8779c272db4bad0501c7a99cd46e7095c28b", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:feedback", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "External analytic challenge contains feedback because its probes must return to alter or explicitly re-justify the next state of the work. Cut the challenge-to-response return path and the outsider can comment but cannot correct the work; the structure becomes observation or later judgment rather than pre-commitment challenge. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "External analytic challenge contains feedback because its probes must return to alter or explicitly re-justify the next state of the work. Cut the challenge-to-response return path and the outsider can comment but cannot correct the work; the structure becomes observation or later judgment rather than pre-commitment challenge." }, { "parent": "prime:viewpoint", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "External analytic challenge contains viewpoint because the challenger must occupy a station whose access, occlusion, and bias profile differ from the authoring frame. Remove the differently positioned station and a challenger sharing the same accumulated access and blind spots cannot provide the outside-frame correction the identity requires. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "External analytic challenge contains viewpoint because the challenger must occupy a station whose access, occlusion, and bias profile differ from the authoring frame. Remove the differently positioned station and a challenger sharing the same accumulated access and blind spots cannot provide the outside-frame correction the identity requires." } ] }, { "archive_line": 12853, "typed_id": "prime:inquiry_change_learning_loop", "slug": "inquiry_change_learning_loop", "type": "prime", "name": "Inquiry-Change Learning Loop", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "5ec1f2ddfff1e35542b701623b5afb4b4183503bc0ff30d56d3d9e4a827115cf", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:feedback", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The loop contains feedback because observed consequences must return to alter the next model-guided action. Cut the evidence return path and changes can be observed but cannot correct later understanding or action, destroying the loop. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The loop contains feedback because observed consequences must return to alter the next model-guided action. Cut the evidence return path and changes can be observed but cannot correct later understanding or action, destroying the loop." }, { "parent": "prime:iteration", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The loop contains iteration because revised practical and epistemic state is carried into a subsequent pass. Remove recurrence with state carried forward and there is no cross-cycle accumulation, only a one-off action study. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The loop contains iteration because revised practical and epistemic state is carried into a subsequent pass. Remove recurrence with state carried forward and there is no cross-cycle accumulation, only a one-off action study." }, { "parent": "prime:learning", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The loop contains learning because evidence must durably update the retained model or capability that selects later action. Remove durable experience-driven model change and the process may react or regulate but does not conduct cumulative inquiry. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The loop contains learning because evidence must durably update the retained model or capability that selects later action. Remove durable experience-driven model change and the process may react or regulate but does not conduct cumulative inquiry." } ] }, { "archive_line": 13619, "typed_id": "prime:inquiry_change_learning_loop", "slug": "inquiry_change_learning_loop", "type": "prime", "name": "Inquiry-Change Learning Loop", "version": 2, "version_date": "2026-08-27", "content_hash": "88aebb8fd97d7cfc8ae25598ede2dc95995b6473b76caeea8b8246c2bc54f2b9", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:feedback", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The loop contains feedback because observed consequences must return to alter the next model-guided action. Cut the evidence return path and changes can be observed but cannot correct later understanding or action, destroying the loop. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The loop contains feedback because observed consequences must return to alter the next model-guided action. Cut the evidence return path and changes can be observed but cannot correct later understanding or action, destroying the loop." }, { "parent": "prime:iteration", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The loop contains iteration because revised practical and epistemic state is carried into a subsequent pass. Remove recurrence with state carried forward and there is no cross-cycle accumulation, only a one-off action study. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The loop contains iteration because revised practical and epistemic state is carried into a subsequent pass. Remove recurrence with state carried forward and there is no cross-cycle accumulation, only a one-off action study." }, { "parent": "prime:learning", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The loop contains learning because evidence must durably update the retained model or capability that selects later action. Remove durable experience-driven model change and the process may react or regulate but does not conduct cumulative inquiry. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The loop contains learning because evidence must durably update the retained model or capability that selects later action. Remove durable experience-driven model change and the process may react or regulate but does not conduct cumulative inquiry." } ] }, { "archive_line": 13652, "typed_id": "prime:inquiry_change_learning_loop", "slug": "inquiry_change_learning_loop", "type": "prime", "name": "Inquiry-Change Learning Loop", "version": 3, "version_date": "2026-08-28", "content_hash": "f169cec0b6af0d5f05c6be72406e26fc65605d687d4f042295ffd59a52d84cc7", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:feedback", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The loop contains feedback because observed consequences must return to alter the next model-guided action. Cut the evidence return path and changes can be observed but cannot correct later understanding or action, destroying the loop. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The loop contains feedback because observed consequences must return to alter the next model-guided action. Cut the evidence return path and changes can be observed but cannot correct later understanding or action, destroying the loop." }, { "parent": "prime:iteration", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The loop contains iteration because revised practical and epistemic state is carried into a subsequent pass. Remove recurrence with state carried forward and there is no cross-cycle accumulation, only a one-off action study. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The loop contains iteration because revised practical and epistemic state is carried into a subsequent pass. Remove recurrence with state carried forward and there is no cross-cycle accumulation, only a one-off action study." }, { "parent": "prime:learning", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The loop contains learning because evidence must durably update the retained model or capability that selects later action. Remove durable experience-driven model change and the process may react or regulate but does not conduct cumulative inquiry. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The loop contains learning because evidence must durably update the retained model or capability that selects later action. Remove durable experience-driven model change and the process may react or regulate but does not conduct cumulative inquiry." } ] }, { "archive_line": 14832, "typed_id": "prime:inquiry_change_learning_loop", "slug": "inquiry_change_learning_loop", "type": "prime", "name": "Inquiry-Change Learning Loop", "version": 4, "version_date": "2026-08-30", "content_hash": "ef03ea1dcd87b41324481a72b9269a71b8e911e5399e236f9b1f0f0b5e3fc42b", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:feedback", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The loop contains feedback because observed consequences must return to alter the next model-guided action. Cut the evidence return path and changes can be observed but cannot correct later understanding or action, destroying the loop. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The loop contains feedback because observed consequences must return to alter the next model-guided action. Cut the evidence return path and changes can be observed but cannot correct later understanding or action, destroying the loop." }, { "parent": "prime:iteration", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The loop contains iteration because revised practical and epistemic state is carried into a subsequent pass. Remove recurrence with state carried forward and there is no cross-cycle accumulation, only a one-off action study. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The loop contains iteration because revised practical and epistemic state is carried into a subsequent pass. Remove recurrence with state carried forward and there is no cross-cycle accumulation, only a one-off action study." }, { "parent": "prime:learning", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The loop contains learning because evidence must durably update the retained model or capability that selects later action. Remove durable experience-driven model change and the process may react or regulate but does not conduct cumulative inquiry. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The loop contains learning because evidence must durably update the retained model or capability that selects later action. Remove durable experience-driven model change and the process may react or regulate but does not conduct cumulative inquiry." } ] }, { "archive_line": 12902, "typed_id": "prime:law_of_large_numbers", "slug": "law_of_large_numbers", "type": "prime", "name": "Law of Large Numbers", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "633b2b2e2efb5c4c460dccaabbe8c3d57dc40be8d729fa45d8bc78f274dfa32f", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:aggregation", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The law contains aggregation because its empirical mean or relative frequency is constructed by combining observations into a normalized summary. Remove the sum, count, or empirical-measure aggregation across observations and there is no sample average or frequency whose limit can be asserted. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The law contains aggregation because its empirical mean or relative frequency is constructed by combining observations into a normalized summary. Remove the sum, count, or empirical-measure aggregation across observations and there is no sample average or frequency whose limit can be asserted." } ] }, { "archive_line": 13620, "typed_id": "prime:law_of_large_numbers", "slug": "law_of_large_numbers", "type": "prime", "name": "Law of Large Numbers", "version": 2, "version_date": "2026-08-27", "content_hash": "29f379cd534411c9aea16a0b671d0d3ab5facd0c50cfb8c036c2e8c0b7950fa1", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:aggregation", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The law contains aggregation because its empirical mean or relative frequency is constructed by combining observations into a normalized summary. Remove the sum, count, or empirical-measure aggregation across observations and there is no sample average or frequency whose limit can be asserted. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The law contains aggregation because its empirical mean or relative frequency is constructed by combining observations into a normalized summary. Remove the sum, count, or empirical-measure aggregation across observations and there is no sample average or frequency whose limit can be asserted." } ] }, { "archive_line": 13653, "typed_id": "prime:law_of_large_numbers", "slug": "law_of_large_numbers", "type": "prime", "name": "Law of Large Numbers", "version": 3, "version_date": "2026-08-28", "content_hash": "35817e18d91cc8ba2755df9a6ead485a4c1bae8965d64334b92f5ca5a6fd6900", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:aggregation", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The law contains aggregation because its empirical mean or relative frequency is constructed by combining observations into a normalized summary. Remove the sum, count, or empirical-measure aggregation across observations and there is no sample average or frequency whose limit can be asserted. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The law contains aggregation because its empirical mean or relative frequency is constructed by combining observations into a normalized summary. Remove the sum, count, or empirical-measure aggregation across observations and there is no sample average or frequency whose limit can be asserted." } ] }, { "archive_line": 14841, "typed_id": "prime:law_of_large_numbers", "slug": "law_of_large_numbers", "type": "prime", "name": "Law of Large Numbers", "version": 4, "version_date": "2026-08-30", "content_hash": "194ab558264d4718838d43fd9a106e3876695a6ca55b1132dd974434e46f95d4", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:aggregation", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "The law contains aggregation because its empirical mean or relative frequency is constructed by combining observations into a normalized summary. Remove the sum, count, or empirical-measure aggregation across observations and there is no sample average or frequency whose limit can be asserted. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "The law contains aggregation because its empirical mean or relative frequency is constructed by combining observations into a normalized summary. Remove the sum, count, or empirical-measure aggregation across observations and there is no sample average or frequency whose limit can be asserted." } ] }, { "archive_line": 13492, "typed_id": "prime:template_instantiation", "slug": "template_instantiation", "type": "prime", "name": "Template Instantiation", "version": 1, "version_date": "2026-08-24", "content_hash": "ed3e66fdc3fac90c3a7138992afa484a70829ddcf687748561eb1756be82a785", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:invariance", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Preservation of the frame and slot semantics across payload substitutions is an internal constituent of template reuse. If the frame changes with every payload, there is no shared template, design-once economy, or cross-instance comparability. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Preservation of the frame and slot semantics across payload substitutions is an internal constituent of template reuse. If the frame changes with every payload, there is no shared template, design-once economy, or cross-instance comparability." } ] }, { "archive_line": 13633, "typed_id": "prime:template_instantiation", "slug": "template_instantiation", "type": "prime", "name": "Template Instantiation", "version": 2, "version_date": "2026-08-27", "content_hash": "fffadc88900e2472dd1e807afc579e00f1d8463fe076bb40c0b0b240cdc53b4d", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:invariance", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Preservation of the frame and slot semantics across payload substitutions is an internal constituent of template reuse. If the frame changes with every payload, there is no shared template, design-once economy, or cross-instance comparability. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Preservation of the frame and slot semantics across payload substitutions is an internal constituent of template reuse. If the frame changes with every payload, there is no shared template, design-once economy, or cross-instance comparability." } ] }, { "archive_line": 13666, "typed_id": "prime:template_instantiation", "slug": "template_instantiation", "type": "prime", "name": "Template Instantiation", "version": 3, "version_date": "2026-08-28", "content_hash": "b4bc4fd870c01717b27a49c2444ef98538de8ff3cc3d539e1cf7e3e3f653a77e", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:invariance", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Preservation of the frame and slot semantics across payload substitutions is an internal constituent of template reuse. If the frame changes with every payload, there is no shared template, design-once economy, or cross-instance comparability. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Preservation of the frame and slot semantics across payload substitutions is an internal constituent of template reuse. If the frame changes with every payload, there is no shared template, design-once economy, or cross-instance comparability." } ] }, { "archive_line": 14990, "typed_id": "prime:template_instantiation", "slug": "template_instantiation", "type": "prime", "name": "Template Instantiation", "version": 4, "version_date": "2026-08-30", "content_hash": "8a94606f573cec9438e64de8d295daee561f1a253b2719377dbdab977956c225", "affected_edges": [ { "parent": "prime:invariance", "flavor": "part_of", "qualifier": "strict", "published_reason": "Preservation of the frame and slot semantics across payload substitutions is an internal constituent of template reuse. If the frame changes with every payload, there is no shared template, design-once economy, or cross-instance comparability. parent_in_child", "corrected_reason": "Preservation of the frame and slot semantics across payload substitutions is an internal constituent of template reuse. If the frame changes with every payload, there is no shared template, design-once economy, or cross-instance comparability." } ] } ] } ] }