{"schema_version":1,"research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_external48_20260801","source_assessment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_opportunity320_20260801","cell_id":"deadweight_loss_reduction__neuroscience","selection_stratum":"DEPLOYABLE_PRIORITY","search_queries":["site:edu MRI research core scheduling cancellation policy priority scanner time waitlist","MRI scanner scheduling optimization cancellation waitlist primary study utilization","research MRI facility booking cancellation no show academic core policy","MRI research center scheduling priority policy unused reserved scanner time","Direct-open attempts: Waisman Center MR facility access policy; University of Arizona MRI Core policies; Yale MRI research policies; DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.08.001; DOI 10.1007/s10278-022-00656-5"],"sources":[{"source_id":"S1","title":"Web-search and direct-source access failure record","publisher":"Open-book research runtime","url":"https://www.waisman.wisc.edu/brain-imaging/for-investigators/facility-access-policy/","source_class":"OFFICIAL_ORGANIZATION_DATA","publication_date":"2026-08-02","accessed_at":"2026-08-02","claims_supported":["The web-search service returned an invalidated-authentication-token error, and direct URL access failed because network name resolution was unavailable.","Consequently, no substantive claim from the targeted external page was treated as verified."]},{"source_id":"S2","title":"Primary-literature access failure record","publisher":"Open-book research runtime","url":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-022-00656-5","source_class":"OFFICIAL_ORGANIZATION_DATA","publication_date":"2026-08-02","accessed_at":"2026-08-02","claims_supported":["The primary-literature URL was directly targeted but could not be opened because network name resolution was unavailable.","Consequently, no title, methods, result, or prior-art claim from the paper was treated as verified."]}],"problem_evidence":{"support":"NOT_FOUND","rationale":"The supplied candidate provides a clear, auditable hypothesis, but the external-search and direct-open attempts did not return readable evidence. The existence or prevalence of compatible unmet demand coexisting with avoidably stranded neuroscience scanner capacity therefore remains externally unverified.","source_ids":["S1","S2"]},"stakeholder_evidence":{"support":"NOT_FOUND","rationale":"No readable external evidence was obtained showing requests, commitments, dissatisfaction measurements, or adoption interest from investigators, core managers, governance bodies, or funders.","source_ids":["S1"]},"prior_art":{"proximity":"INDETERMINATE","closest_analogues":[{"name":"Targeted but unverified research-MRI cancellation and access policies","similarity":"The search was designed to test whether academic imaging cores already use cancellation rules, priority scheduling, transferable bookings, waitlists, or automatic release.","remaining_difference":"Because the targeted pages could not be opened, neither the similarity nor any remaining difference can be independently established.","source_ids":["S1"]},{"name":"Targeted but unverified constrained MRI scheduling research","similarity":"The targeted primary-literature URL appeared potentially relevant to optimization under heterogeneous MRI scheduling constraints.","remaining_difference":"Without opening the paper, it cannot establish whether the work includes research-core reservations, rapid cancellation rematching, protected priorities, or the proposed safeguards.","source_ids":["S2"]}],"distinctive_claim_remaining":"Unverified hypothesis: after a local coexistence audit, transferable eligible reservations plus earlier release and rapid compatibility-filtered rematching will improve completed compatible sessions or waiting time relative to ordinary scheduling without violating predeclared safety, access, data-quality, or staff-burden limits.","confidence":"LOW"},"implementation_evidence":{"support":"NOT_FOUND","rationale":"The candidate describes technically ordinary components—record extraction, eligibility rules, notifications, audit logs, and workflow changes—but no external implementation documentation or study could be opened. Integration feasibility, readiness-data quality, operational burden, and performance are unverified.","source_ids":["S1","S2"]},"scores":{"meaningful_impact":{"score":2,"rationale":"Impact could be meaningful if avoidably stranded compatible capacity is material, but neither prevalence nor recoverable volume was externally verified.","source_ids":["S1"]},"stakeholder_pull":{"score":1,"rationale":"The supplied actors have plausible interests, but no external demand, commitment, or adoption evidence was verified.","source_ids":["S1"]},"incremental_advantage":{"score":2,"rationale":"The mechanism is causally aligned with the hypothesized allocation failure, but no verified baseline comparison or effect evidence is available.","source_ids":["S1","S2"]},"distinctiveness_plausibility":{"score":1,"rationale":"A bounded prior-art conclusion cannot be reached because potentially relevant policy and scheduling sources could not be opened.","source_ids":["S1","S2"]},"technical_implementability":{"score":3,"rationale":"The proposed software and workflow components appear bounded in the supplied specification, but external feasibility and integration evidence are missing.","source_ids":["S1","S2"]},"adoption_authority_feasibility":{"score":2,"rationale":"The supplied candidate identifies a plausible joint authority structure, but no external facility policy or local authorization was verified.","source_ids":["S1"]},"evidence_readiness":{"score":3,"rationale":"The proposed retrospective audit has observable fields and a clear falsifier, although actual data availability, quality, linkage authority, and comparison validity remain unknown.","source_ids":[]},"safety_net_benefit":{"score":3,"rationale":"The supplied design preserves existing safety and protocol requirements and includes rollback, but operational thresholds and authorized decision owners remain unspecified.","source_ids":[]},"scalability":{"score":2,"rationale":"The mechanism could be portable in principle, but no external evidence established common data structures, systems, demand patterns, or governance across imaging cores.","source_ids":["S1","S2"]}},"score_confidence":"LOW","costs":{"first_evidence":{"band_2026_usd":"10K_TO_50K","scope":"A retrospective one-core audit and shadow replay covering data extraction, de-identification, compatibility and readiness adjudication, analyst and scheduler labor, governance consultation, preregistration, sensitivity analysis, and reporting.","confidence":"LOW","assumptions":["Existing booking, cancellation, maintenance, staffing, protocol, and readiness records are accessible.","No participant contact, production-system modification, or new equipment is required.","Ambiguous compatibility and necessary-unavailability classifications require manual review.","This is a reasoned resource-equivalent band; direct cost sources were unavailable."],"source_ids":[]},"initial_deployment_startup":{"band_2026_usd":"50K_TO_250K","scope":"One-core workflow configuration or lightweight integration, eligibility and release rules, protected-priority logic, notifications, audit logging, privacy and security review, governance and safety review, procedures, training, and evaluation design.","confidence":"LOW","assumptions":["The existing scheduler can be configured or integrated without replacement.","The scope excludes scanner acquisition, construction, and added scanner hours.","Institutional labor, software work, compliance, coordination, and training are included.","This is a reasoned resource-equivalent band; direct cost sources were unavailable."],"source_ids":[]},"operational_launch":{"band_2026_usd":"50K_TO_250K","scope":"An eight-week, one-core controlled pilot only after audit and authorization, including project management, scheduler and technologist coverage, technical support, safety and access monitoring, staff-burden measurement, comparison analysis, incident review, and rollback readiness.","confidence":"LOW","assumptions":["Only already approved, scanner-compatible research studies participate.","Additional operational coverage prevents rematching from shifting uncompensated burden to staff.","Existing research scanner capacity is used; clinical and emergency capacity remain excluded.","This is a reasoned resource-equivalent band; direct cost sources were unavailable."],"source_ids":[]},"annual_recurring":{"band_2026_usd":"50K_TO_250K","scope":"One-core operation including software support, scheduling administration, exception handling, monitoring, privacy and governance reporting, protected-access audits, rule recalibration, training, and periodic evaluation.","confidence":"LOW","assumptions":["The estimate covers one existing research imaging core.","Human exception review and periodic rule validation remain necessary.","No utilization saving or scientific-return credit is assumed.","This is a reasoned resource-equivalent band; direct cost sources were unavailable."],"source_ids":[]}},"verified_pipeline_gates":{"externally_supported_problem":{"status":"UNCERTAIN","reason":"The diagnosis is testable, but no readable external source or local audit verified the full coexistence of compatible unmet demand with avoidably stranded capacity.","source_ids":["S1","S2"]},"externally_credible_adopter_or_authorizer":{"status":"UNCERTAIN","reason":"The supplied authority model is plausible, but external facility governance documentation could not be verified.","source_ids":["S1"]},"distinct_testable_incremental_claim":{"status":"YES","reason":"The supplied claim identifies a distinct comparison—transfer, earlier release, and rapid compatibility-filtered rematching versus ordinary scheduling—and measurable operational and harm falsifiers.","source_ids":[]},"bounded_next_evidence_step":{"status":"YES","reason":"A retrospective audit with shadow replay is non-live, reversible, fixed in scope, and can reject both the problem diagnosis and projected incremental benefit.","source_ids":[]},"no_unresolved_safety_or_authority_stop":{"status":"UNCERTAIN","reason":"The specification preserves safety rules, but local data authority, governance approval, protected-access floors, burden limits, safety-attribution rules, and decision owners remain unresolved.","source_ids":[]},"credible_cost_scope_and_range":{"status":"YES","reason":"The broad bands explicitly cover labor, data, software, compliance, governance, coordination, equipment assumptions, operations, monitoring, and evaluation, but remain low-confidence reasoned estimates.","source_ids":[]}},"next_evidence_step":"Preregister a non-live retrospective audit and shadow replay using 6–12 recent months from one research imaging core. Classify each slot and waiting study by scanner and protocol compatibility, approval, readiness, staffing, maintenance or setup, release timing, and protected-access category. Compare observed ordinary scheduling with the proposed transfer–early-release–rapid-rematching rules on compatible fill time, waiting time, and completed-session opportunity. Falsify the diagnosis if no predeclared material coexistence of compatible ready demand and avoidably stranded capacity remains after exclusions; reject advancement if projected gains disappear under scan-type, staffing, maintenance, time-block, and study-mix sensitivity analyses or breach historical access or workload limits.","blocking_evidence":["Successful open-book review of research-imaging scheduling policies, waitlists, automatic release mechanisms, priority rules, and optimization studies.","Local evidence that compatible, approved, ready unmet demand materially coexists with avoidably unused, late-released, or lower-priority reserved scanner time.","Evidence separating avoidable idle time from maintenance, safety-required setup, staffing constraints, participant constraints, and scanner or protocol incompatibility.","Validated local fields or auditable adjudication for readiness, compatibility, and protected-access status.","Historical distributions and governance-approved thresholds for protected access, staff workload, data quality, and safety escalation.","Local authorization for data use and, before any live test, for transfer, release, priority, monitoring, halt, and rollback rules."],"research_disposition":"PROBLEM_PREVALENCE_STUDY","world_novelty_boundary":"The bounded search and direct-open attempts failed because external access was unavailable. Prior-art proximity is therefore indeterminate. No inference about world novelty, patentability, freedom to operate, or absence of close implementations is warranted."}