{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"computability_boundary_mapping__agricultural_science","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"a33754692e26382e3d4aecb7ad56e416c157a15bb69a6710ab14aa0668baf2db","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The agricultural verification problem is independently consequential: unsupported binary recommendations can affect production, labor, neighboring communities, and environmental resources even without the computability analogy."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal explicitly maps the open-ended class, universal terminating guarantee, formal boundary, enforceable fragment, honest fallback, and recheck conditions without collapsing computability into complexity or field validity."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Restricting accepted syntax, requiring constructive or impossibility evidence, routing by proved scope, and preserving unknown states directly interrupts timeout-based and scope-inflated verdicts."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All archetype components receive coherent domain realizations, and selected mechanisms retain their defining guarantees, limits, and counterfactual roles."},"G5":{"status":"RESEARCH_NEEDED","reason":"The decisive empirical premise about accepted executable languages and binary requirements is unverified, and no property-preserving reduction for the exact agronomic language and property is supplied. The candidate marks these gaps honestly, so they cannot be resolved closed-book."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier distinguishes absence of the alleged universal requirement from intervention failure, while the intervention falsifier specifies observable comparative outcomes and independent validation."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposed first step is frozen and offline, preserves existing deployment authority, excludes live management changes, distinguishes formal from field safety, and supplies halt and rollback conditions."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The declared problem and intervention closely reproduce the archetype's quantifiers, model-relative classification, decidable restriction, fallback, status honesty, and reclassification logic."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"Agronomic actors, model-policy representations, field-fidelity limits, environmental consequences, and existing authority are handled credibly, although the prevalence and expressiveness of the target systems remain unverified."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The chain from formal specification through dual evidence, enforceable scope, labelled routing, and versioned rechecking is coherent and directly linked to the stated failure mode, conditional on the unresolved target-language premise."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The full component set is translated with concrete agricultural realizations, including proof obligations, representation contracts, unknown handling, uncertainty residue, review, and complexity follow-on."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":3,"reason":"The candidate addresses finite-language counterevidence, model-to-field mismatch, unusable fragments, abstraction alarms, downstream label collapse, and formalization error without claiming those risks are solved."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It replaces benchmark-driven confidence in a universal verifier with a sharper classification of exact, restricted, one-sided, bounded, unresolved, and out-of-scope guarantees."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"A frozen offline first step, explicit outputs, corpus replay, proof review, halt conditions, and outcome falsifier support a feasible test, though acceptance metrics and target artifacts still require specification."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The offline and reversible design could prevent consequential overclaims at limited initial exposure, while formal-property mismatch and automation confidence remain material residual hazards."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched and no evidence establishes novelty of the composition in agricultural verification."}},"weighted_total":81.25,"disposition":"RESEARCH_NEEDED","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"The unrestricted-class boundary rests on an unsupplied domain-specific reduction and an unverified claim about the expressive power of the accepted model language.","repair":"Obtain an independently checked reduction for the frozen language and property, or retain an unresolved classification; separately establish what deployed systems accept and what guarantees their interfaces require.","evidence_boundary":"Neither theorem transfer nor deployment prevalence may be inferred from the generic fact that some crop models are executable."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The operational falsifier names useful coverage but does not define corpus construction, label audit rules, or acceptable handling of unknown results.","repair":"Preregister representative and adversarial cases, expected guarantee labels, downstream propagation checks, and coverage criteria before comparing the intervention with baseline practice.","evidence_boundary":"Offline corpus performance would test operational behavior within the sampled envelope, not prove field safety or universal correctness."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior problem identifier, causal-lever identifier, or registered repair to compare; the remaining blocker is evidentiary rather than an attributable revision effect."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"RESEARCH_NEEDED","tester_summary":"The candidate is a strong, domain-aware structural translation with coherent mechanisms, falsifiers, and authority controls. It cannot clear the evidence gate because the target language's computational expressiveness, the real interface requirement, and the required reduction are not established in the closed-book packet."}