{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"computability_boundary_mapping__communication_media_studies","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"870f27cca1928670b442024a9a21c59169fa77965a5263e74f761bace5131ef5","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate identifies an independently recognizable moderation problem: universal Boolean verdict requirements applied to programmable media while timeouts, unsupported inputs, and uncertainty are collapsed into enforcement outputs."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The mapping preserves the archetype's open-ended class, universal guarantee, explicit computation model, parallel constructive and impossibility inquiry, enforceable decidable regions, honest fallbacks, and versioned reclassification."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposed lever directly targets false certainty by restricting exact decisions to proved fragments and routing other inputs into guarantee-labeled outcomes that preserve unknown and out-of-scope states."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All archetype components receive coherent domain realizations, and the selected mechanisms retain their proper roles as proof methods, restriction methods, routing controls, bounded fallbacks, records, and independent checks."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate does not assert that undecidability or practical prevalence has been established. It labels the central claim as conditional, distinguishes inference from hypothesis, and requires a checked reduction or constructive witness before changing the guarantee."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The packet separately falsifies the diagnosed problem through bounded scope and existing status preservation, and falsifies the intervention through routing, error, review-load, and soundness outcomes in the pilot."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The authorized first step is sandboxed and non-enforcing, consequential case authority remains with accountable reviewers, prohibited actions are explicit, and halt and rollback conditions cover proof, routing, admission, and soundness failures."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate closely instantiates the complete boundary-mapping structure without collapsing undecidability, complexity, recognition, bounded checking, or human assistance."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"The transfer is credible for platform and newsroom moderation and attends to interpretation, appeals, creators, and downstream effects, though the formal problem remains more computational than grounded in established media-studies evidence."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Enforced scope typing and multistate routing plausibly prevent weak or inconclusive analyses from becoming false Boolean certainty, but the key reduction and the semantic adequacy of the policy predicate remain open obligations."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is complete, specific, and operationally coherent, with adapted components retaining their original function."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate anticipates bounded-class counterevidence, semantic mismatch, admission bypass, status collapse, inequitable review burdens, abstraction errors, and institutionalization of an invalid model."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It replaces a monolithic accuracy-centered moderation question with a sharper classification of which guarantees are possible for which media classes and what honest behavior follows outside them."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The non-enforcement pilot, synthetic corpus, routing measures, proof review, exclusions, and rollback make the proposal testable, although the policy formalization and acceptance thresholds still require specification."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"Early boundary clarification could prevent unsafe defaults and wasted automation effort, while the sandbox, preserved appeal authority, and rollback constrain risk; semantic and distributive harms remain material."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"The packet explicitly reports unsearched prior-art status and supplies no comparative evidence establishing novelty in moderation, verification, or media-governance practice."}},"weighted_total":83.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"The unrestricted-class impossibility claim remains conditional because no exact deployed representation, faithful behavioral predicate, or checked source-to-target construction is supplied.","repair":"Instantiate a versioned policy-artifact decision problem and obtain independent review of either a valid reduction or a constructive total decider for that declared class.","evidence_boundary":"The packet appropriately labels the claim as a hypothesis and states that neither undecidability nor practical prevalence is established."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"Novelty relative to existing moderation architectures, abstention protocols, formal policy systems, and programmable-content analysis is unknown.","repair":"Conduct targeted prior-art research and compare the proposal's scope typing, status alphabet, proof obligations, routing contract, and governance record against the closest existing systems.","evidence_boundary":"No novelty conclusion can be drawn from the closed-book packet because prior-art status is explicitly unsearched."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior problem identifier, causal-lever identifier, or registered repair to compare; no trajectory improvement can therefore be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate passes the reject-first gates and qualifies for deep research. Its strongest features are structural completeness, honest conditionality, enforceable scope restriction, multistate fallback routing, independent proof review, and a non-enforcement pilot. The main unresolved work is empirical and formal validation rather than structural repair."}