{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"computability_boundary_mapping__disaster_management","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"54547be71f92df9a587bead909d79eeb70244c79830ed51028d93e518161d6c0","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The operational problem—authoritative policy-assurance outputs that conceal timeout, scope, and model limits—exists independently of the imported computability framework."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate maps the unrestricted class, total-decision demand, formal model, decidable fragments, weaker fallbacks, unknown state, and guarantee-labelled routing with explicit scope correspondence."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Making the class explicit, testing constructive and impossibility routes, enforcing restricted fragments, and preserving unknown outputs plausibly interrupts both false assurance and futile universal-analyzer investment."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All required components receive domain realizations, and selected mechanisms have distinct causal, operational, test, or safety roles with credible removal consequences."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate labels unverified premises as hypotheses or inferences, reports prior art as unsearched, avoids unsupported theorem conclusions, and makes the first step a falsifying classification pilot."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Problem and intervention falsifiers are distinct, observable, and capable of defeating the transfer or its proposed workflow without conflating bounded failure with undecidability."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Authority remains with the emergency-management body; the first step is offline and bounded, operational automation is excluded, affected parties are named, and halt and rollback conditions are explicit."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The declared problem reproduces the archetype's universal-guarantee tension, model-relative boundary, restricted solvable region, and honest fallback structure."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"Policy languages, incident-transition models, response latency, downstream labels, operational authority, and model-to-reality gaps are concretely represented."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The causal pathway is coherent and falsifiable, although its applicability depends on the declared language actually supporting the expressiveness and universal quantification under examination."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is complete and translates each abstract obligation into an identifiable disaster-policy assurance artifact or control."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly addresses bounded-class counterevidence, semantic mismatch, abstraction unsoundness, reduction defects, downstream suppression, and operational overreach."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It changes the decision from improving a presumed total analyzer to classifying what can honestly be guaranteed and governing weaker modes."},"practicality_testability":{"score":4,"reason":"The offline pilot specifies a versioned language, formal property, finite corpus, trace bound, comparison modes, measurable unknown behavior, and explicit halt conditions."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":4,"reason":"The bounded advisory pilot offers substantial learning while excluding live-plan activation, real-world safety claims, and silent treatment of unknown or out-of-scope inputs."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":1,"reason":"The transfer is thoughtfully composed, but prior art is explicitly unsearched and no external novelty evidence is supplied."}},"weighted_total":92.5,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers and no earlier repair registry against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate passes every reject-first gate by treating computability as a model-relative classification question, preserving bounded and unknown states, and confining initial work to a reversible offline pilot. Its only material evidentiary weakness concerns novelty, which does not undermine the transfer's internal quality or safety."}