{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"computability_boundary_mapping__physics","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"315f2310f639135155af11e9da7f955a2a092e516f9fb2894e361f16a0151125","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate identifies an independently observable computational-physics problem: an unsupported universal reachability guarantee and the collapse of timeout, unknown, and false. The claim remains meaningful even if unrestricted undecidability is never established."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The transfer preserves the archetype's class specification, representation and computation contracts, universal quantifiers, evidence-relative status lattice, decidable regions, honest fallbacks, and reclassification triggers without treating physical models as automatically equivalent to programs."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Freezing semantics and scope, requiring checked constructive or impossibility evidence, enforcing an admitted fragment, and routing residual queries by guarantee directly remove the conditions that permit finite simulation or timeout to masquerade as a universal verdict."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All archetype components receive coherent domain realizations. Load-bearing mechanisms have distinct roles in positive evidence, negative evidence, enforceable restriction, routing, and explicit unknown behavior; rejected mechanisms are accompanied by relevant reasons and counterfactuals."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate explicitly marks unrestricted undecidability as unresolved, identifies the encoding and preservation obligations, reports prior art as unsearched, and makes no unsupported theorem or empirical performance claim."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether the diagnosed overclaim exists, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether routing improves calibration without merely producing unusable unknown results. The analogy break and failure condition expose additional disconfirmation routes."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposed first step is a shadow pilot with named authority boundaries, excluded actions, stop conditions, rollback behavior, and protection against an unvalidated router influencing live experiments."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate closely reproduces the archetype's computability-boundary logic while keeping theorem assumptions, quantifier scope, fallback guarantees, and status distinctions explicit."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"The mapping respects encoded dynamical models, continuous quantities, approximate semantics, experimental meaning, and the distinction between model claims and claims about nature, though the pilot model family and observable semantics remain unspecified."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":4,"reason":"The intervention acts on the actual sources of overclaiming: implicit scope, unexamined totality, invalid extrapolation, unenforced restrictions, and deceptive output states."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is complete, domain-specific, and internally consistent, with mechanisms assigned to appropriate operational, evidentiary, testing, and safety functions."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate survives the strongest obvious attacks by admitting that the class may already be bounded, that physical encodings may invalidate reductions, that restricted fragments may lose scientific meaning, and that formal proofs may certify the wrong model."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It replaces a simulation-performance framing with a model-relative solvability and guarantee-calibration framing that changes both project decisions and public claims."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The shadow pilot, archived queries, bounded reference checks, routing comparison, stop conditions, and separate falsifiers make evaluation feasible, but success metrics and admission semantics require further specification."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"A reversible shadow deployment offers meaningful protection against misleading scientific claims with limited immediate exposure, while language restriction, abstraction imprecision, and label misuse remain material risks."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"The candidate explicitly reports prior art as unsearched, so closed-book evaluation provides no evidence that the transfer or intervention is novel."}},"weighted_total":87.5,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The proposed model family, experimentally meaningful reachability semantics, and admission grammar are not yet instantiated.","repair":"Before deployment, define the pilot family's encoding, target-region semantics, precision rules, fragment-membership check, and label-comparison criteria.","evidence_boundary":"This is an operational specification gap, not evidence that the structural transfer fails."},{"priority":"LOW","issue":"No prior-art evidence supports novelty.","repair":"Conduct a bounded literature and practice review covering reachability analysis, hybrid-system verification, computable analysis, abstraction, and scientific-model validation before making a novelty claim.","evidence_boundary":"Closed-book evaluation can assess internal quality but cannot establish external novelty."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers and no predecessor repairs to assess."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a structurally faithful and scientifically cautious transfer. It separates the independently observable overclaim from the unresolved impossibility hypothesis, supplies a credible causal intervention and reversible test, and preserves explicit evidence, authority, and safety boundaries. External novelty remains unestablished."}