{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"computability_boundary_mapping__political_science","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"17f95e427e78fef5ebf3b24a047ea8ec2f3a761cc3c71e3e498dfbb72edab3d8","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The regulatory demand for universal, terminating compliance verification is independently recognizable through procurement language, interface behavior, affected parties, and concrete institutional harms."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal preserves the archetype's essential structure: an open-ended executable class, universal guarantee, explicit computation model, parallel constructive and impossibility inquiry, enforceable restricted regions, and honest fallback states."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Formal classification, checked certificates, enforceable fragments, and guarantee-labeled routing directly target the false binary verdicts and futile universal-automation investment identified in the problem."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All archetype components receive coherent domain realizations, mechanism roles are distinguished, rejected mechanisms have reasons, and the load-bearing mechanisms form a complete causal chain without laundering bounded or one-sided results."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate does not claim that undecidability has already been proved, labels empirical and transfer claims conservatively, declares prior art unsearched, and requires checked evidence before changing the public guarantee."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier separately tests whether a universal automation demand exists, while the intervention falsifier tests for a total algorithm or failure of the router and restrictions to improve verdict honesty."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Legal certification authority remains with the accountable institution; the first step is offline and bounded; live rights, sensitive data, proxy overclaiming, unchecked proofs, and coerced unknowns are explicitly excluded or halted."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The transfer reproduces the full model-relative solvability boundary and its restricted, partial, and governed fallback structure."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"Actors, institutions, certification authority, equality concerns, and political risks are credible, though correspondence between formal equality and substantive justice remains unresolved by design."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The proposed checks and routing should prevent unsupported universal verdicts, but the benefit depends on faithful formalization and successful enforcement of output labels."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every listed component is translated into a specific regulatory or election-verification function with clear operational meaning."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate identifies the finite-class rival, semantic analogy break, independent failure conditions, separate falsifiers, and several distributional and institutional hazards."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It productively reframes verifier procurement from a testing-capacity question into a prior classification of what guarantees are possible under the declared model."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The frozen-language pilot, parallel proof attempts, bounded inputs, explicit outputs, and baseline comparison are testable, although formalization and proof review require substantial specialist capacity."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The intervention can avert deceptive clearance and wasted investment with a reversible pilot, while proxy legitimation, exclusion, delay, and stale authority records remain material risks."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is expressly unsearched, so the packet supplies no evidence supporting novelty."}},"weighted_total":83.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"The formal equal-treatment property may be a politically inadequate proxy for the legal or substantive equality claim.","repair":"During deep research, add an independently governed semantic-validity protocol linking the formal property to the operative legal and policy claim, with affected-group review and explicit non-equivalence language.","evidence_boundary":"A computability proof can certify only the stated formal model; the packet provides no evidence that this model captures substantive justice or legitimacy."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The proposal lacks evidence about existing verification practice, frequency of forced binary verdicts, and whether unknown routing improves real institutional decisions.","repair":"Collect requirements, interface records, and blinded pilot outcomes comparing the proposed routing regime with the current baseline while preventing any effect on live rights.","evidence_boundary":"The causal pathway is plausible but remains hypothetical and has not been empirically validated in the packet."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"No prior-art assessment supports a novelty claim.","repair":"Search political-institutional algorithm auditing, election-system verification, formal methods in public administration, and regulatory assurance literature before asserting distinctiveness.","evidence_boundary":"The candidate explicitly records prior art as unsearched."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers, no prior repairs, and no earlier candidate against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a strong, internally complete structural transfer with credible political institutions, direct causal leverage, distinct falsifiers, and careful authority boundaries. Its principal limitation is evidentiary rather than structural: substantive proxy validity, field effectiveness, and novelty remain unestablished and should anchor deep research."}