{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"computability_boundary_mapping__sociology_anthropology","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"27f97b8a9b204ebb98813dbee477c06a66a75d2d537cd37b0b42796d0d59eb8b","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The target is an independently recognizable overclaim about unrestricted executable agent-based models, not a social-science problem invented merely to resemble computability theory."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The mapping preserves the unrestricted class, total terminating decider, conditional impossibility proof, enforceable decidable fragments, explicit unknown behavior, and model-relative guarantee."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Formal scope classification, checked proof obligations, syntactic fragment enforcement, and guarantee-labeled routing directly interrupt timeout-as-negative and finite-example-to-universal inference errors."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All archetype components receive coherent domain realizations, and selected mechanisms have differentiated causal, operational, testing, and safety roles with credible removal consequences."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate does not present the reduction as completed evidence; it labels the result conditional, preserves unresolved status, and requires independent verification before impossibility language is authorized."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether the actual requirement is bounded and finite, while the intervention falsifier separately tests proof rejection, fragment utility, abstention handling, and claim correction."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Authority is confined to research-interface changes, independent review governs impossibility claims, consequential policy use is excluded, represented communities are protected from model-to-world overreach, and halt and rollback conditions are explicit."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal closely instantiates the archetype's class-wide guarantee problem, model-relative boundary proof, decidable-region design, and honest fallback structure."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The transfer is grounded in executable social simulation while explicitly separating formal emergence reachability from empirical claims about communities and collective life."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The mechanisms plausibly prevent categorical misclassification, but the central reduction and pilot effects remain to be verified."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is complete, specific to simulation semantics and governance, and preserves distinctions among proof, scope, status, fallback, review, and feasibility."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly addresses the strongest bounded-model objection, semantic openness, invalid reductions, state-space explosion, and real-world authority leakage."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It converts repeated analyzer testing into a disciplined classification of solvability, scope, proof burden, fallback guarantees, and empirical interpretation."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The authorized pilot is feasible and compares against a bounded reference, but evaluation measures and acceptance thresholds are not fully operationalized."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"Early boundary checking could prevent wasted effort and deceptive outputs, with strong safeguards, although erroneous proof acceptance or restrictive fragments could still cause material harm."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior-art status is explicitly unsearched, so no novelty claim has supporting evidence."}},"weighted_total":87.5,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers and no prior repairs to attribute."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a strong, domain-faithful transfer with honest evidentiary boundaries, distinct falsifiers, complete mechanism integration, and appropriate authority controls. Its main unresolved issue is external novelty evidence, while the proposed impossibility classification properly remains conditional on a checked reduction."}