{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"computability_boundary_mapping__tech_ethics_ai_governance","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"f86a40c7ee906d847cec9930b48fbc9d4cb572a05f4154287a0bc656aab8816c","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The governance problem is independently specified as an overbroad certification claim with observable timeout and labeling failures; it does not depend on accepting the archetype analogy."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal preserves the archetype's essential structure: an unrestricted total-decision claim, explicit model and quantifier contracts, constructive and impossibility evidence, enforceable decidable regions, honest fallback states, and versioned reclassification."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Enforcing verifier scope and abstention directly interrupts the path from inconclusive analysis to authoritative Boolean certification, while proof obligations and reduction review govern when stronger claims are permitted."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every listed archetype component has a concrete domain realization, and selected mechanisms have differentiated causal, operational, testing, or safety roles with meaningful removal counterfactuals."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate labels empirical and unrestricted-status claims as hypotheses or unresolved in substance, does not present an attempted reduction as completed proof, and explicitly bounds formal certification to the encoded policy and model."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether the alleged universal-boundary problem is actually absent, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether routing and status preservation prevent unsupported verdicts."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The first step is offline and reversible, production authority is bounded, affected parties and approval roles are named, prohibited uses are explicit, and halt conditions withdraw guarantees when enforcement, soundness, labeling, or proof review fails."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The transfer closely instantiates the full computability-boundary pattern without collapsing computability, complexity, boundedness, recognition, or unresolved status."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal is anchored in AI assurance institutions, certification interfaces, formal policy conformance, deployment authority, affected parties, and the crucial distinction between formal compliance and ethical legitimacy."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The mechanism chain credibly prevents unsupported certification by constraining scope and preserving abstention, but its organizational effect remains unobserved and depends on downstream enforcement."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is complete, domain-specific, and operationally coherent, with proof, interface, review, traceability, and follow-on feasibility functions kept distinct."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly addresses finite-domain counterevidence, model-to-world mismatch, unenforceable restrictions, abstraction failures, alert fatigue, strategic interpretation of uncertainty, and proof formalization error."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It replaces a misleading universal ethical-certification question with model-relative solvability classes and governed output guarantees, revealing options unavailable to ordinary testing or monitoring."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The offline fixture-based pilot, seeded failures, reproducibility requirement, and halt rules are executable, though acceptance metrics and downstream label-preservation instrumentation remain underspecified."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The reversible pilot could prevent false assurance and wasted verifier investment at limited initial exposure, while restrictive fragments, false alarms, and institutionalized formalization errors remain material risks."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so no closed-book evidence establishes novelty relative to existing formal assurance or AI-governance practice."}},"weighted_total":87.5,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The candidate establishes internal novelty of the framing but supplies no evidence that the governance design differs materially from existing formal assurance and certification practice.","repair":"Conduct a bounded prior-art comparison covering formal verification governance, assurance cases, abstaining certification interfaces, and model-relative compliance claims; identify the candidate's distinct contribution or narrow the novelty claim.","evidence_boundary":"The packet marks prior art as unsearched, so novelty cannot be inferred from conceptual coherence."},{"priority":"LOW","issue":"The pilot specifies fixtures and review but not measurable criteria for downstream preservation of abstention and scope labels.","repair":"Define observable acceptance criteria for label retention, routing correctness, reviewer reproducibility, seeded-violation detection, and prohibited Boolean coercion before execution.","evidence_boundary":"The proposed causal effect is plausible but remains hypothetical until the operational interface is tested."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior problem identifier, causal-lever identifier, or registered repair against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a strong, independently grounded domain transfer with complete structural translation, credible causal leverage, explicit falsifiers, and unusually careful authority and safety boundaries. Its main unresolved boundary is evidentiary: novelty is unsupported and operational effects have not yet been observed."}