{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"deadweight_loss_reduction__architecture_urban_planning","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"b20e80d1e6925feb2c0ad0efd105b7652b8d525c8a7e14efd4592a8c9a687cb8","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The curb-allocation problem is independently recognizable through saturation, cruising, illegal stopping, unreliable loading, and usable slack; it is not defined merely as an instance of the archetype."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Static temporal and use-allocation rules form a specific wedge between fixed curb capacity and beneficial access, while the proposal explicitly separates avoidable mismatch from protected reservations and genuine scarcity."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Scarcity-responsive prices and use schedules can induce retiming, relocation, and substitution, linking the proposed lever to availability, search, loading, and blocked-lane outcomes. The candidate also states conditions under which that chain would fail."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The translated components cover diagnosis, safeguards, incidence, behavioral response, implementation boundaries, monitoring, adjustment, authority, sensitivity, and sunset. Selected mechanisms have differentiated causal, operational, testing, and safety roles, while unsuitable mechanisms are explicitly rejected."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical propositions are labeled as hypotheses or inferences, prior-art status is disclosed as unsearched, and local performance and legal feasibility are explicitly left unverified. No unsupported result or authority claim is presented as established fact."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether static allocation actually explains the observed mismatch, whereas the intervention falsifier tests whether the bounded redesign improves specified outcomes without offsetting harm. These are distinct and observable."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal identifies the competent municipal authority, limits the authorized first step to a reversible pilot, preserves protected access, excludes expansive actions, and specifies harm-triggered adjustment and rollback."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal faithfully instantiates a value-blocking allocation wedge, protected-purpose separation, incidence review, bounded redesign, and monitored adjustment loop."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The treatment of curb space reflects its place-specific parking, loading, accessibility, safety, transit, cycling, emergency, enforcement, and public-realm functions rather than reducing it to a fungible commodity."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The incentive and allocation chain is coherent, but its strength depends on local demand flexibility, usable nearby slack, enforcement reliability, and safeguards against displacement."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every archetype component receives a concrete curb-management realization, and the adaptations remain functionally faithful to the source component roles."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate confronts genuine scarcity, indispensable reservations, enforcement and information alternatives, willingness-to-pay limits, neighborhood displacement, technical failure, and revenue bias with explicit break conditions."},"reframing_gain":{"score":3,"reason":"Framing curb dysfunction as a temporal allocation wedge clarifies why expansion, static enforcement, or better information may be insufficient, though scarcity pricing is already a recognizable planning approach."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The bounded pilot, control sites, observable outcomes, expiry, and rollback structure support testing, but threshold values, measurement windows, sampling methods, and local implementation details remain to be calibrated."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"Reversibility, protected reservations, equity credits, price bounds, monitoring, and sunset constrain exposure, while displacement, exclusion, privacy, and enforcement risks remain materially possible."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"The packet explicitly reports prior art as unsearched and supplies no evidence that this composition is novel within curb-management practice."}},"weighted_total":85,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"Outcome and halt categories are well specified, but their operational thresholds, measurement windows, and attribution rules are not yet defined.","repair":"Before deployment, pre-register locally calibrated thresholds, measurement procedures, comparison windows, and decision rules for continuation, adjustment, and rollback.","evidence_boundary":"The packet establishes a credible test architecture but does not establish local calibration or empirical effect sizes."},{"priority":"LOW","issue":"The proposal makes no supported novelty claim because relevant prior art has not been examined.","repair":"Conduct a bounded prior-art review of dynamic curb pricing, curb-use scheduling, equity protections, and controlled municipal pilots before asserting novelty.","evidence_boundary":"Novelty cannot be inferred from internal coherence or from the supplied mechanism composition."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior problem identifier, causal-lever identifier, or registered repair to compare; neither identifier is reported as changed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate passes the reject-first gates through an independent urban problem definition, strong archetype correspondence, a plausible and falsifiable causal chain, complete component translation, bounded evidence claims, and credible authority and safety controls. Its main unresolved boundary is empirical and prior-art validation rather than structural fitness."}