{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"deadweight_loss_reduction__chemistry_materials","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"d3c7d157c4bacbbc8f6bfb3d7f01ec21fee8cf84810dd93f397f831b98d7053d","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The facility-allocation problem is independently specified through observable idle capacity, qualified queued demand, allocation ownership, and measurement outcomes rather than depending on the source analogy."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Non-transferable quotas and late-release rules form a specific avoidable wedge; blocked reassignment, protected constraints, incidence, bounded redesign, monitoring, and rollback correspond closely to the archetype."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposed lever directly changes the hypothesized binding allocation right by enabling early transfer and qualified rolling reassignment, with valid completions and waiting time as downstream outcomes."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The component map is complete and domain-translated, while load-bearing diagnostics, allocation review, safeguards, assessment, and pilot mechanisms retain their stated functions. Rejected pricing, matching, and approval mechanisms are coherently distinguished."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical prevalence and effect claims are explicitly bounded as hypotheses or inferences, prior art is marked unsearched, counterevidence is stated, and the first step is an audit rather than an unsupported implementation claim."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether rule-attributable refillable idle time actually coexists with ready compatible demand, while the intervention falsifier separately tests comparative outcomes and safeguard breaches."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Decision authority is identified, safety and maintenance gates remain outside the intervention, the pilot is scoped and expiring, prohibited actions are explicit, and rollback conditions cover quality, equity, workload, and gaming."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal precisely identifies the wedge, blocked value, protected purpose, matched redesign lever, incidence, and reversible monitoring loop."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"Instrument compatibility, setup dependence, calibration, maintenance, training, data validity, staff workload, and scientific-access concerns are treated as substantive materials-facility constraints."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The chain from binding allocation rights to reassignment and valid completions is coherent, but its empirical importance depends on contemporaneous refillability and qualified ready demand that remain unverified."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every archetype component receives a concrete facility-level realization, including adapted diagnostics that avoid forcing monetary pricing onto an entitlement problem."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate confronts incompatible windows, genuine scarcity, portfolio diversity, novice access, speculative behavior, switching loss, rebound demand, staff burden, and flexible-laboratory capture."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It productively reframes an apparent scheduling-interface problem as a potentially binding allocation-rights wedge while preserving the transaction-cost rival as a diagnostic alternative."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The historical audit and bounded expiring pilot are feasible and comparative, although readiness classifications, access floors, and harm thresholds still require operational prespecification."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The intervention could reclaim valuable capacity at limited scope, and retained gates plus rollback constrain harm, though administration, switching, and distributional capture could erase the benefit."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":1,"reason":"The particular synthesis may be useful, but prior art is explicitly unsearched and no evidence establishes novelty."}},"weighted_total":88.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The key empirical premise—meaningful rule-attributable coexistence of refillable idle capacity and qualified ready demand—has not yet been established.","repair":"During the authorized audit, prespecify classifications for usable intervals, compatibility, readiness, rule-attributable blockage, and valid completion before deciding whether to launch the pilot.","evidence_boundary":"The packet supports a coherent hypothesis and audit design, not a claim that the wedge is prevalent or large in actual facilities."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"Several halt conditions rely on terms such as material decline or breached access floor without operational definitions.","repair":"Before enrollment, define measurable safety, quality, setup-loss, workload, and protected-access thresholds together with observation windows and decision authority.","evidence_boundary":"The safeguard categories are complete, but their decision thresholds are not supplied."},{"priority":"LOW","issue":"Novelty and neighboring facility-scheduling practices remain unevaluated.","repair":"Conduct a bounded prior-art review of transferable reservations, waitlist reassignment, quota exchange, and shared-instrument allocation pilots before making a novelty claim.","evidence_boundary":"Prior-art status is explicitly unsearched, so novelty cannot be inferred from the closed-book packet."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers and no prior repairs against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is structurally precise, domain-grounded, causally testable, adversarially aware, and safely bounded. Its principal limitations are empirical validation, threshold operationalization, and absent novelty evidence, none of which undermine the proposed audit-first and reversible testing path."}