{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"deadweight_loss_reduction__environmental_climate","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"21be9a022419eaab9b61fb246952b01a4c07f084bd56af3132201fc2034597fd","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate defines allocation rigidity as an independently observable problem and distinguishes it from genuine basin scarcity."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The mapping preserves the archetype’s wedge, blocked value, protected purpose, incidence, bounded redesign, monitoring, and rollback structure."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Temporary transfer authority directly targets legal nontransferability, while the baseline and nearest rival distinguish rule reform from matching or processing improvements."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The component map is complete, incompatible price components are rejected explicitly, and selected mechanisms have differentiated causal, operational, safety, and test-design roles."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical premises are bounded as hypotheses or inferences, prior-art status is disclosed, and no unsupported factual authority or fabricated evidence is asserted."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Separate problem and intervention falsifiers use observable hydrologic, allocation, demand, outcome, and harm conditions."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Authority is bounded to the regulator’s lawful mandate, protected rights and ecological limits remain binding, and suspension, expiry, and restoration rules constrain harm."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal closely instantiates avoidable allocation loss while preserving the cap and other legitimate protections."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"It incorporates location, timing, consumptive use, return flows, ecological floors, legal priority, and rights-holder effects, though basin-specific feasibility remains unverified."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The proposed authority change can unlock reassignment when nontransferability is binding, but hydrologic compatibility and timely administration may sharply limit realized transfers."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Archetype components are translated into concrete water-allocation diagnostics, safeguards, decision artifacts, monitoring, and reversibility provisions."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate confronts nonfungibility, hidden depletion, existing transferability, absent demand, rights impairment, concentration, selection bias, and administrative burden."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It productively separates unavoidable water scarcity from avoidable rigidity in the rule distributing authorized withdrawals."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The bounded pilot, metering, matched baseline, eligibility rules, halt triggers, and expiry support testing, subject to lawful authority and adequate hydrologic measurement."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The reversible scope limits downside while preserving potential adaptation value, but third-party injury and ecological depletion remain consequential residual risks."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so novelty is not evidenced."}},"weighted_total":83.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior problem, causal lever, or registered repair against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is structurally strong, domain-aware, causally discriminating, safely bounded, and independently falsifiable. Its empirical premises and novelty remain matters for subsequent research rather than unsupported claims."}