{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"deadweight_loss_reduction__futurism_foresight","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"4c31ebf4131ab9ffa27cd61c906dfdd3a531b74944e18155fe05286f60d1fa74","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate identifies a domain-native problem: fixed-cycle and legacy-slot allocation can misroute scarce foresight capacity. This is independently recognizable without relying on deadweight-loss terminology."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Fixed allocation rules form a plausible wedge between available foresight capacity and time-sensitive demand, while capacity limits and methodological safeguards remain explicitly protected."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The bounded rolling reserve directly changes slot assignment and release. The causal chain distinguishes allocation failure from genuine undersupply and names capacity expansion as the nearest rival."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The component map is complete, marks price-specific machinery incompatible, and translates the selected diagnostic, allocation-review, incidence, assessment, and reversible-pilot mechanisms without changing their essential functions."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Prevalence, manifestations, magnitude, and intervention effects are consistently bounded as hypotheses or inferences. Prior art is marked unsearched, and no empirical or novelty claim is fabricated."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether scarcity or required deliberation explains delay, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether reallocation improves access without unacceptable displacement or safeguard harm."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Authority is assigned to the relevant portfolio and governance bodies; workload, review, confidentiality, participation, protected work, rollback, and expiry boundaries are explicit."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal preserves the full wedge, blocked-value, protected-purpose, incidence, bounded-redesign, monitoring, and rollback structure of the archetype."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The translation respects foresight's plural, delayed, contested value and protects methodological quality, participation, confidentiality, long-horizon work, and weak voices."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Releasing unused slots and reserving capacity for rolling triage could reduce allocation-driven delay, but the binding-wedge diagnosis and effect magnitude remain appropriately unverified."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"All relevant components receive concrete domain realizations, and incompatible price machinery is rejected rather than forced into the proposal."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate confronts necessary slack, genuine expert scarcity, sponsor capture, urgency inflation, displacement, quality substitution, diversity loss, overload, and confidentiality risk."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal productively reframes some foresight backlogs as allocation-governance failures rather than automatically treating them as staffing shortages."},"practicality_testability":{"score":4,"reason":"The audit, bounded reserve, published rubric, comparison baseline, observable outcomes, harm triggers, appeal path, expiry, and rollback rule form a feasible test."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The intervention is scoped and reversible with strong safeguards, though disputed value, displacement, strategic behavior, and delayed downstream effects limit confidence before measurement."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"No prior-art search or comparative novelty evidence is supplied, and the candidate expressly makes no novelty claim."}},"weighted_total":90,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"LOW","issue":"Novelty remains unevidenced.","repair":"Conduct a targeted prior-art review of rolling portfolio triage, adaptive foresight commissioning, and internal analytical-capacity allocation before asserting distinctiveness.","evidence_boundary":"The packet explicitly marks prior art as unsearched and supports only structural and testability judgments."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is the original candidate, with no prior repair cycle, problem change, or causal-lever change to attribute."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a structurally faithful, domain-specific, falsifiable, bounded, and authority-aware transfer. Its empirical effects remain conjectural by design, and novelty requires external evidence, but neither limitation defeats the proposed pilot."}