{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"deadweight_loss_reduction__sociology_anthropology","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"521b5822f73f7bced53cd492092f94b0575c84b43e74362e37b4eefa5d7bc57e","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem is independently recognizable as disproportionate procedural delay affecting time-sensitive ethnography, rather than being defined only through the source archetype."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate identifies a specific approval wedge, blocked beneficial activity, a legitimate protective purpose, affected-party incidence, and a bounded redesign that preserves substantive safeguards."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Risk triage, reusable intake, parallel handling, service targets, and escalation directly address the hypothesized classification and workflow causes; an unchanged-workflow capacity rival is distinguished and testable."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Required components are translated coherently, nonapplicable price components are explicitly rejected, and the selected diagnostic, streamlining, assessment, and pilot mechanisms retain their defining functions."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Prevalence, avoidable delay, blocked value, and comparative effects are consistently bounded as hypotheses. The candidate requires local audit and pilot evidence and asserts no unsupported measured result."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether avoidable pathway-attributable delay exists, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether the redesigned pathway improves outcomes without unacceptable protection, equity, or workload effects."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Independent board authority, affected-community input, exclusions, escalation, automatic expiry, and concrete halt conditions keep researchers from self-exempting or trading protections for speed."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The wedge, protected purpose, blocked value, redesign, incidence review, monitoring, and reversibility correspond closely to the archetype without collapsing into blanket deregulation."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal incorporates open-ended fieldwork, relational and collective harms, consent, privacy, vulnerability, community interests, representation, and ethics-board independence specific to ethnographic practice."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The workflow mechanism is coherent and distinguishes misclassification from raw capacity shortage, but whether procedural drag is binding remains deliberately unverified pending case-level audit."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is complete, candid about incompatibilities, and gives each applicable component a concrete domain realization tied to governance or evaluation."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate confronts incomplete protocols, reviewer scarcity, case-mix confounding, risk understatement, burden shifting, collective harm, congestion rebound, and the limits of the permitting analogy."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It reframes a polarized speed-versus-ethics dispute as an empirical separation of avoidable procedural drag from constitutive ethical deliberation and protected scrutiny."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The retrospective audit, comparator, bounded pilot, outcomes, rival, and rollback path are actionable, though eligibility rules and trigger thresholds still require prospective operational specification."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":4,"reason":"A de-identified audit precedes exposure, the pilot is narrow and sunsetted, substantive protections remain ring-fenced, and serious failures trigger return to ordinary review."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so no evidence supports a novelty claim."}},"weighted_total":88.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"The binding-wedge claim remains empirically unresolved and could be displaced by protocol incompleteness, substantive deliberation, or reviewer scarcity.","repair":"Before pilot authorization, conduct the proposed case-level audit with defined controls for case risk, completeness, population, reviewer capacity, and time-sensitive field opportunities.","evidence_boundary":"The packet supplies a credible causal hypothesis and falsifier but no local observations establishing prevalence, magnitude, or attribution."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"Eligibility and protection-trigger language is conceptually strong but not yet operational enough for consistent triage and rollback decisions.","repair":"Have the authorized board prospectively approve a reproducible eligibility rubric, adjudication process, outcome definitions, and trigger thresholds before enrollment.","evidence_boundary":"The packet names exclusions and monitored outcomes but does not demonstrate classification reliability or specify approved decision thresholds."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The novelty claim has no supporting search or comparison record.","repair":"Compare the proposal with existing ethics-review tiering, expedited-review, ethnography-specific, and quality-improvement models before claiming novelty.","evidence_boundary":"The candidate explicitly labels prior art as unsearched; no novelty inference is warranted from structural quality alone."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is the original attempt, with no prior candidate or registered repair against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a strong, domain-specific, testable transfer that preserves ethics oversight while targeting only hypothesized procedural miscalibration. Its main unresolved needs are local causal evidence, operational triage thresholds, and prior-art research."}