{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__accounting_auditing","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"2fec08d240250316aad2c3495018f1594dc8eab3f057e9bf52bc309f8ae88810","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal states a domain-specific close-exception propagation problem independently of the source archetype and explicitly treats its existence as a falsifiable hypothesis."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The checkpoint transition, indexed state, approximate modes, gains, selection boundary, residuals, drift, coupling, scope, and traceability have coherent domain correspondences."},"G3":{"status":"RESEARCH_NEEDED","reason":"Redirecting review toward persistent combinations is plausible, but the packet does not establish that the proposed operator is identifiable or that modal sensitivity predicts incremental audit yield rather than association."},"G4":{"status":"RESEARCH_NEEDED","reason":"The component inventory and mechanism dispositions are complete, but eigendecomposition is load-bearing without a specified relation among state dimension, independent transitions, estimator constraints, and conditioning."},"G5":{"status":"RESEARCH_NEEDED","reason":"Claims are appropriately bounded as hypotheses and no fabricated support appears, but prevalence, stable modal structure, intervention benefit, and prior-art status remain unsupported by the closed-book packet."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier distinguishes coupled propagation from coordinate-level explanations, while the intervention falsifier separately tests incremental detection and lead time at equal effort."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Authority remains with responsible audit personnel, the initial study is retrospective, consequential automated actions are excluded, and explicit halt conditions restore ordinary planning."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal preserves the archetype's transformation-centered logic, modal selection, traceability, residual discipline, regime limits, and drift governance."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"The state variables, actors, procedures, consequences, and authority boundaries are recognizably grounded in financial-close and audit practice, although empirical prevalence is unknown."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":2,"reason":"The prioritization chain is coherent, but an observational transition model and local perturbation analysis do not by themselves identify the effect of reallocating audit work."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every named component receives a specific accounting realization, and the selected and rejected mechanisms have differentiated roles and counterfactual-removal logic."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":3,"reason":"The candidate anticipates leakage, scaling artifacts, regime changes, degeneracy, residual structure, one-off errors, and missed baseline findings with meaningful stopping rules."},"reframing_gain":{"score":3,"reason":"It usefully reframes isolated exception ranking as coupled temporal propagation while retaining source-level audit traceability."},"practicality_testability":{"score":1,"reason":"The retrospective comparison is operationally bounded, but the packet does not show that the available transition history can support the high-dimensional operator on which the worklist depends."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"A retrospective, equal-effort pilot offers useful learning with limited direct harm, and the exclusions reduce risks of automation, stigma, and procedural displacement."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so no evidence supports novelty relative to existing continuous-auditing, anomaly-detection, or multivariate risk-allocation approaches."}},"weighted_total":70,"disposition":"RESEARCH_NEEDED","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["causal_plausibility","practicality_testability","novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"The load-bearing transition operator may be underidentified relative to the indexed exception state and available independent checkpoint transitions.","repair":"Specify the estimand, state dimension, sampling unit, transition count, estimator constraints, regularization, conditioning rule, and mode-recovery validation before permitting modal ranking.","evidence_boundary":"The packet provides no dimensions, effective sample size, or recovery evidence from which identifiability can be inferred."},{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"The sensitivity sweep ranks modeled responses but does not establish that reallocating reviewer effort causes better detection.","repair":"Preregister a leakage-controlled held-out comparison that fixes reviewer-hours, assignment rules, outcome adjudication, and a baseline noninferiority safeguard.","evidence_boundary":"Any incremental audit yield remains hypothetical until tested on completed closes not used to estimate or tune the operator."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"Novelty and domain prevalence are unresolved.","repair":"Research related continuous-auditing, process-mining, dynamic-factor, state-space, and multivariate audit-prioritization methods, then bound novelty and revise the nearest rival if necessary.","evidence_boundary":"No prior-art search or domain evidence is supplied, so neither novelty nor practical prevalence should be asserted."}],"repairs":[{"repair_id":"repair_operator_identifiability","target":"operator identifiability and modal recovery test","operation_code":"SPECIFY_TEST","affected_identifiers":["coupled_close_exception_propagation","eigendecomposition_workflow","mode_guided_audit_test_allocation"],"acceptance_test":"Before any modal ranking, show that the scoped checkpoint-transition sample identifies the chosen operator after any preregistered dimension reduction or regularization, with no train-test leakage, acceptable conditioning and spectral separation, and stable recovery of modes and gains under resampling; otherwise stop and use the baseline.","materially_distinct":true,"supersedes":null,"repair_fingerprint":"87b0072a86b26c5188e9f092c719ba83908e0fc3e6c284d77986a76978045b37"}],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers and no prior repairs or revisions to attribute."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"RESEARCH_NEEDED","tester_summary":"The candidate is a strong structural and domain translation with careful falsifiers and safety boundaries, but its load-bearing operator is not yet shown to be identifiable and its causal benefit and novelty require evidence."}