{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__astronomy_astrophysics","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"a5900ae46884537b7ebfa483ddaf7aac09da1a60ceadac48a0cca7c230866004","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The target is a domain-specific screening failure involving collective orbital perturbations, independently defined without relying on the archetype as its justification."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The variational transformation, perturbation state, modal basis, gain spectrum, selection rule, residual checks, drift monitoring, and interpretation limits correspond coherently to the archetype."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposed gate can alter which systems receive expensive integration by identifying outcome-relevant collective directions missed by elementwise screening, with full simulation retained as adjudicator."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All archetype components receive domain translations, load-bearing mechanisms have explicit contributions and removal consequences, and incompatible mechanisms are rejected for domain-relevant reasons."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Claims are labeled as hypotheses or inferences, prior-art status is disclosed as unsearched, empirical superiority is not asserted, and local modal evidence is explicitly bounded from global-stability claims."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether coupled hidden directions are needed, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether the modal gate improves decisions over the adjudicating rival."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Authority is limited to an internal computational pilot, consequential observing and publication decisions remain under existing review, excluded uses are explicit, and rollback returns cases to full ensembles."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal preserves the full transformation-to-modes-to-action structure and includes residual, drift, coupling, conditioning, and scope controls."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"The orbital-dynamics framing is scientifically coherent and appropriately cautious, though finite-time eigenmode interpretation in nonlinear Hamiltonian dynamics requires stronger treatment of coordinate dependence, symplectic structure, and time-varying operators."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Collective modal information could improve computational triage, but useful predictive lead time and incremental value over mature chaos diagnostics remain empirical hypotheses."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every named component is translated into an operational orbital-dynamics counterpart with no material orphan or decorative element."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly addresses nonlinearity, non-normal transient growth, degeneracy, structured residuals, scaling dependence, resonance effects, and failure of spectral separation."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It productively shifts screening from isolated elements and pairs to collective perturbation directions while preserving global simulation as the final authority."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The retrospective benchmark, held-out labels, comparator set, metrics, halt criteria, and rollback are actionable, although key tolerances and sampling protocols still require preregistration."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":4,"reason":"The intervention is computational and reversible, potential efficiency and calibration gains are meaningful, and safeguards sharply constrain false reassurance and downstream misuse."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"The candidate explicitly reports that prior art has not been searched, so distinctiveness from existing modal, Lyapunov, chaos-screening, and reduced-order orbital methods is unevidenced."}},"weighted_total":85,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"Incremental novelty and performance relative to established orbital-stability diagnostics are unknown.","repair":"Conduct a bounded literature and benchmark review covering finite-time modal analysis, variational indicators, Lyapunov methods, resonance diagnostics, and reduced-order screening in multiplanet dynamics.","evidence_boundary":"Until that work is completed, describe the proposal as an unsearched mechanism composition rather than a novel scientific method."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The treatment of coordinate dependence and Hamiltonian structure is not yet sufficiently specified for reproducible modal interpretation.","repair":"Preregister canonical coordinates, scaling, symplectic consistency checks, operator construction, conditioning limits, posterior alignment rules, and criteria for preferring singular or covariant directions over eigenvectors.","evidence_boundary":"Local eigenmodes should not be interpreted as physically invariant perturbations unless their stability under these choices is demonstrated."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior problem identifier, causal-lever identifier, or registered repair against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a structurally complete, domain-aware, falsifiable, and safely bounded transfer suitable for deep empirical research. Its principal unresolved weakness is the absence of novelty evidence, followed by the need to formalize coordinate and Hamiltonian validity before operational benchmarking."}