{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__chemistry_materials","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"f02447c1ba462c038dbbcaf92166e418b916c72a4240ef91a7cfe0bd6248a9fd","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The polymer-cure problem is independently specified through actors, observable state, consequence, objective, baseline, and domain-specific falsifier rather than being defined by analogy alone."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate preserves the archetype's coupled transformation, hidden invariant directions, modal response, stability partition, intervention map, residual accountability, drift monitoring, and bounded interpretation."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposed lever acts on a hypothesized growing reaction-diffusion mode through bounded heat-input changes, with an explicit chain from coupled dynamics to precursor detection, damping, and reduced harm."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All archetype components are translated, load-bearing mechanisms have counterfactual-removal tests, incompatible methods are rejected for stated reasons, and conditioning, coupling, residual, gap, and local-window limits are retained."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical claims are consistently bounded as hypotheses or inferences, prior-art status is disclosed as unsearched, and no unsupported result or authority claim is presented as established evidence."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether coupled history adds value beyond direct observables, while the intervention falsifier separately tests modal alarm and damping performance against both baseline and rival."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The initial study is advisory and bounded to approved conditions, named authorities retain control, existing hard trips remain active, hazardous escalation and autonomous production changes are excluded, and halt conditions are explicit."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal instantiates the full invariant-mode structure with traceable domain realizations and preserves its defining residual and scope constraints."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"Reaction kinetics, heat transport, conversion, geometry, sensor coverage, and cure-stage limits are treated in domain-appropriate terms, although mode observability and local-operator reproducibility remain unvalidated."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The feedback from temperature-dependent reaction to localized heating makes the modal precursor and bounded damping lever plausible, but their lead time and controllability remain empirical hypotheses."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every named component has a concrete realization, including selection, stability, intervention, residual, drift, coupling, validity-window, and spectral-gap elements."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly addresses nonlinearity, non-normality, unobserved spatial modes, drift, cross-mode amplification, rival explanations, false reassurance, and operator overreaction."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It materially shifts monitoring from bulk and coordinate alarms to coupled spatial growth directions while preserving traceability to measurements and operational controls."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"Historical replay and bounded coupon testing are feasible and comparator-based, but identification procedures, sensor sufficiency criteria, and preregistered operating thresholds still require specification."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"Advisory deployment and strong rollback rules limit downside while earlier detection could be valuable; nuisance alarms, missed inter-sensor modes, and inappropriate operator response remain meaningful risks."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so distinctiveness relative to established cure-monitoring, system-identification, and model-based control work is unsupported."}},"weighted_total":83.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"The existence, reproducibility, observability, and useful lead time of the proposed precursor have not yet been demonstrated.","repair":"Preregister historical and coupon evaluations across representative batches, including sensor-coverage checks, held-out lead-time and false-alarm endpoints, conditioning limits, and comparison with both stated rivals.","evidence_boundary":"Until those tests succeed, the precursor and damping effect remain hypotheses and cannot support production control or safety certification."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"Distinctiveness from existing polymer-cure monitoring and model-based control approaches is unknown.","repair":"Conduct a bounded prior-art review centered on spatial cure-state estimation, local stability analysis, thermal-runaway prediction, and constrained cure control, then identify which claimed contribution remains distinct.","evidence_boundary":"No novelty or precedence claim should be made while prior-art status remains unsearched."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers, no prior candidate comparison, and no registered repairs addressed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate passes the reject-first gates and merits deep empirical and prior-art research. Its structure, causal logic, component coverage, falsifiers, and safety boundaries are strong, while empirical validation and novelty evidence remain deliberately unresolved."}