{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__cognitive_science","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"faab4ffa3c59b01c53f76d960bd8c3548c2e245e3a2f1adb8dfa1b8ef2012c88","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The attention-lapse problem is stated independently in domain observables, consequences, actors, and objectives rather than being manufactured from modal terminology."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal maps an explicit local transition operator, coupled state variables, invariant directions, gains, residuals, drift, and scope limits to corresponding domain constructs."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposed lever targets precursor-mode amplitude through bounded controls, with randomized tests separating prediction from intervention and checking both modal and lapse outcomes."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every required component has a domain realization, and selected mechanisms have distinct load-bearing, testing, operational, or safety roles with defensible exclusions."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Unverified scientific propositions are labeled as hypotheses or inferences, empirical maturity is bounded, effectiveness is not claimed, and prior-art status is explicitly unsearched."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem conjecture and intervention conjecture have separate falsifiers, while the nonlinear rival, observable-threshold baseline, and sham timing provide discriminating comparisons."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Authority, consent, excluded uses, low-risk authorized actions, suspension conditions, and rollback to ordinary safety procedures are explicitly bounded."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The transformation, modes, gains, leverage mapping, residual checks, drift monitoring, and local-validity contract preserve the archetype's full decision structure."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The state variables, task regimes, participant protections, measurement limitations, and prohibition on psychological reification are well grounded in cognitive-science practice."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The chain distinguishes predictive modes from causal control and uses randomization, but selective controllability and cross-session modal stability remain empirical conjectures."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"All named components are translated into operational domain realizations without silently dropping difficult elements such as non-normality, coupling, residual structure, or spectral separation."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal directly confronts nonlinear prediction, single-variable sufficiency, session instability, measurement reactivity, failed control selectivity, and local-versus-global validity."},"reframing_gain":{"score":3,"reason":"It replaces isolated warning thresholds with coupled dynamic precursors and creates an intervention-oriented stability interpretation, though a nonlinear predictor could erase the practical advantage."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"A preregistered within-participant pilot, held-out validation, randomized controls, explicit thresholds, and halt rules are executable, but reliable operator estimation may require substantial repeated data."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The bounded laboratory pilot offers useful prospective evidence with reversible controls, while privacy, unequal error rates, false reassurance, and interruption burden require continued oversight."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so no closed-book novelty claim is supported."}},"weighted_total":85,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The candidate provides no evidence that the proposed modal lapse-monitoring design is novel relative to existing cognitive-state-space, vigilance, adaptive-automation, or dynamical-systems work.","repair":"Conduct a scoped prior-art review before making any novelty or differentiation claim, while preserving the current hypothesis status until empirical testing is complete.","evidence_boundary":"The closed-book packet supports structural coherence and testability but cannot establish novelty or existing empirical precedent."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior repair history, and neither the problem identifier nor the causal-lever identifier changed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a coherent, domain-bounded modal reframing of attention-lapse prediction and control. It preserves the archetype's coupled transformation logic, supplies discriminating causal tests and rollback conditions, and avoids treating statistical modes as mental modules. Its principal unresolved boundary is prior-art novelty, while modal repeatability and selective control remain appropriately testable empirical conjectures."}