{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__criminology_forensic","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"0710d902f928998408246969b894de1282c380bb9a145383b3746f7ef32a8595","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The forensic toxicology quality-control problem is independently intelligible, consequential, and currently addressed through univariate monitoring even without the archetype."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal explicitly maps a scoped run-transition operator, multivariate state, approximate modes, modal gains, stability partitions, intervention coordinates, residuals, drift, and interpretation limits into the laboratory setting."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposed lever targets persistent coupled degradation through authorized technical responses, while distinguishing predictive warning from causal control and reserving control claims for a bounded comparative trial."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component has a domain realization, load-bearing mechanisms have clear counterfactual roles, incompatible mechanisms are rejected for principled reasons, and conditioning, non-normality, coupling, residual, and regime limitations remain explicit."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical existence, stability, prediction, and controllability are consistently bounded as hypotheses requiring testing; no effectiveness, prevalence, or novelty claim is presented as established evidence."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Separate problem and intervention falsifiers distinguish failure to find predictive coupled drift from failure of authorized actions to damp an established hazardous mode."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The first step is retrospective and shadow-only, preserves ordinary quality-control authority, prohibits case-level evidentiary use, names affected parties, and includes explicit suspension and rollback conditions."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The transfer preserves the archetype's transformation, invariant-direction, gain, stability, intervention, residual, drift, and scope structure with unusually complete traceability."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The actors, measurements, workflow boundaries, technical authority, evidentiary risks, analyte-specific failure modes, and legal consequences are specific to forensic toxicology practice."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Earlier recognition of coupled degradation could plausibly trigger useful technical review, but predictive association and maintenance responsiveness remain unverified and may be confounded by analyst actions or regime changes."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"All named components are translated into operational laboratory objects, rules, monitors, or contracts, with direct and adapted mappings used coherently."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly confronts stochasticity, partial observation, non-normality, unstable eigenvectors, small gaps, residual hazards, confounding, feedback, leakage, and legal overinterpretation."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It changes the monitoring target from isolated threshold breaches to coupled run-to-run degradation directions while retaining visibility of coordinate-specific failures."},"practicality_testability":{"score":2,"reason":"The shadow design is bounded and measurable, but the proposed development and evaluation windows appear too small for reliable transition estimation, mode stability assessment, failure association, and false-alert characterization without a sampling justification."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"Shadow use and rollback sharply limit direct harm, while successful warning could reduce exposure to unreliable findings; operational burden and downstream misuse remain material risks."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":1,"reason":"The proposal is differentiated from univariate control charts and variance-based monitoring, but prior art is explicitly unsearched and no novelty evidence is supplied."}},"weighted_total":86.25,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["practicality_testability","novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is the original attempt, with no prior problem or causal-lever identifier and no claimed revision to attribute."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a strong, domain-grounded modal transfer with complete component coverage, distinct falsifiers, and unusually careful forensic safeguards. Its main research needs are a defensible sampling and power plan for stable transition estimation and an external prior-art assessment."}