{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__data_science","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"2d8ad64241f34d9bb6072a38c0b1108d0bb57f7cb4e0a5245acf75418279057c","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The production feedback-drift problem is independently defined through actors, observables, consequences, objectives, a baseline, and a nearest rival rather than merely restating the archetype."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The fitted transition operator, approximately invariant directions, modal gains, intervention map, residual checks, and drift governance preserve the archetype's essential correspondence."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal links coupled temporal evolution to detectable growing modes and then to feasible controls through sensitivity analysis, while treating control responsiveness as a hypothesis for retrospective testing."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component has a domain realization, and the mechanism selections and rejections preserve their distinct roles, dependencies, and known failure modes."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical effectiveness is not asserted as established; claims are labeled, uncertainty and conditioning checks are specified, causal interpretation is bounded, and prior-art status is explicitly unsearched."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether coupled precursors exist and outperform marginal monitoring, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether mapped controls reduce projected growth or consequences."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The authorized first step is retrospective and read-only, production changes remain under existing authorities, affected parties and subgroup harms are recognized, and explicit halt conditions constrain use."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal instantiates the full transformation-to-modes-to-action structure with residual, drift, coupling, and scope controls intact."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The state, delayed outcomes, temporal validation, leakage risk, subgroup performance, retraining feedback, and model-change governance are specific to production data science."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The causal chain is coherent and appropriately bounded, but stationarity, mode identity, and the effect of feasible controls remain empirical hypotheses."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"All supplied components receive concrete operational translations, including selection thresholds, uncertainty, residual budgets, coupling diagnostics, and local validity bounds."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly addresses abrupt shocks, label delay, non-normality, reflexivity, short noisy histories, subgroup masking, and rivalry from change-point detection."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It changes monitoring from isolated metric breaches to coupled temporal directions and separates modal growth from outcome leverage."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"A bounded retrospective comparison is executable and preregisterable, though sufficient version-consistent windows and credible offline control evaluation may be difficult to obtain."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":4,"reason":"The read-only pilot offers early-warning value with limited immediate exposure, while production automation, harmful excitation, extrapolation, and unsupported causal claims are excluded."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"No prior-art search or other novelty evidence is supplied, and the classification explicitly marks prior-art status as unsearched."}},"weighted_total":88.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is the original attempt, with no prior problem or causal-lever identifier and no registered repairs or revisions to attribute."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a structurally complete, domain-faithful, falsifiable, and safely bounded modal-drift proposal. Its main unresolved boundary is empirical validation and prior-art novelty rather than a gate-level defect."}