{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__education_pedagogy","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"5a95021f7d354bcd6548f5bf3800f12807fac3d2143d153c56790f2845c46a65","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The pedagogical problem is independently recognizable: aggregate mastery can conceal reproducible coupled prerequisite failures with delayed consequences."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The bounded skill-state transition, modal basis, gain spectrum, intervention map, residual checks, and drift governance preserve the archetype's structure without treating surface skill coordinates as modes."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal connects estimated propagating skill combinations to feasible task bundles and tests later independent mastery against both ordinary practice and prerequisite remediation."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component has a domain realization, load-bearing mechanisms have explicit counterfactual roles, and rejected mechanisms are excluded for structurally relevant reasons."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Effectiveness, modal stability, and educational interpretation are bounded as hypotheses or inferences; uncertainty, conditioning, residual, subgroup, and prior-art limits are disclosed without unsupported authority claims."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier independently tests whether coupled propagation exists, while the intervention falsifier tests whether modal targeting adds value after model-validity conditions hold."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Teacher and curriculum authority is bounded by school procedures, prohibited high-stakes uses are explicit, required instruction is preserved, and rollback conditions cover validity, equity, workload, and oversight failures."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate translates the complete decomposition-and-governance pattern into a bounded instructional transition setting with strong traceability."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal uses criterion-referenced skills, formative checkpoints, prerequisite remediation, teacher workload, mastery outcomes, and subgroup measurement concerns in pedagogically credible roles."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The causal chain is coherent and experimentally separable, though selective task-bundle control and locally stable mastery dynamics remain empirical assumptions."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is complete, specific, mutually coherent, and tied to observable educational artifacts or decision rules."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly addresses nonlinearity, nonstationarity, measurement artifacts, non-normality, unstable bases, structured residuals, subgroup harm, and rival explanations."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It shifts remediation from isolated visible deficits toward propagating combinations while retaining interpretable skill loadings and comparison with conventional pedagogy."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"A bounded pilot with routine checkpoints, feasible task bundles, blocked assignment, held-out outcomes, and suspension rules is actionable, although estimation burden and sample adequacy may constrain execution."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The low-stakes reversible pilot offers meaningful diagnostic and instructional value, with residual risks controlled through exclusions, subgroup checks, workload monitoring, and rollback."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched and the candidate makes no novelty claim."}},"weighted_total":87.5,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior problem, causal lever, or registered repair against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate passes the reject-first gates through a close structural translation, a bounded causal test against a strong pedagogical rival, explicit model-invalidity checks, and conservative authority controls. Its only clear evidentiary weakness concerns novelty, which is candidly left unclaimed and does not undermine the proposed research test."}