{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__engineering_design","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"9909c714e2bc72a1830e7aec86405880aaa490feaca989dc5c85f53ffc8dde19","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The independently recognizable problem is unsafe late detection and mitigation of coupled aeroelastic flutter, not a restatement of modal decomposition."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The local aeroelastic operator, coupled mode shapes, complex modal gains, intervention map, residual checks, and drift bounds correspond directly to the archetype structure."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal connects feasible structural and control changes to hazardous-mode damping and safety outcomes through sensitivity testing, with cross-effects and empirical falsification explicitly retained."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component has a domain realization, load-bearing mechanisms have removal counterfactuals, and unsuitable mechanisms are rejected for technically relevant reasons."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical applicability and intervention effects are labeled as hypotheses, prior-art status is disclosed as unsearched, and no fabricated measurements, citations, or validation results are presented."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether a directly observable coordinate outperforms the modal precursor, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether predicted damping improvements survive bounded physical trials."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Affected parties, accountable authorization, conservative first testing, prohibited actions, stop authority, rollback conditions, and preservation of existing margins are explicit."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal preserves the full transformation-to-modes-to-gains-to-action structure, including residuals, coupling, drift, and bounded validity."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"The aeroelastic state, damping, mode-veering, sensing, and test-envelope translations are technically coherent, but the asserted coordinate-centered ordinary-practice baseline is not established within the packet."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Changing stiffness, mass balance, damping, sensing, or feedback can plausibly alter modal damping, and the proposal tests that chain; the predicted effects remain unvalidated hypotheses."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"All supplied components receive concrete engineering realizations and are integrated into analysis, intervention selection, validation, monitoring, or governance."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate identifies nonlinear, non-normal, identification, reconstruction, coupling, and extrapolation failure modes and supplies distinct counterevidence and stopping conditions."},"reframing_gain":{"score":2,"reason":"The shift from coordinate limits to coupled modal precursors provides decision value relative to the stated baseline, but modal flutter analysis is closely native to the chosen problem and the incremental gain over actual practice is unsubstantiated."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The bounded ground or subscale test, held-out reconstruction, sensitivity comparison, and halt logic are executable, though operational thresholds and a non-normal transient-growth screen are not yet instantiated."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposed first step can improve hazard visibility and mitigation ranking while avoiding crewed boundary testing and retaining independent authorization and existing margins."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"The candidate explicitly reports unsearched prior art and supplies no evidence that this composition is novel within aeroelastic design or certification practice."}},"weighted_total":80.0,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["reframing_gain","novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"The claimed ordinary-practice baseline may understate existing modal flutter analysis, weakening both the comparative reframing claim and novelty claim.","repair":"Compare the proposal against documented aeroelastic design, ground-vibration, wind-tunnel, and certification workflows, then identify a specific decision or governance gap not already served by standard modal analysis.","evidence_boundary":"The packet marks prior art as unsearched and provides no standards, practice survey, or comparative evidence."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The plan names preregistered limits without supplying measurable acceptance values or a method for deriving them.","repair":"Before testing, define identification confidence, damping uncertainty, reconstruction residual, mode-separation, drift, load, and halt criteria from a conservative pilot and independent safety review.","evidence_boundary":"The packet supplies threshold categories and authority but no empirically justified values."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"Strong non-normal transient amplification is recognized as an analogy break but is not screened in the proposed workflow.","repair":"Add a bounded transient-growth or input-output amplification screen and route the case to the nonlinear rival when eigenvalue stability fails to bound safety-relevant response.","evidence_boundary":"The packet acknowledges non-normality as a failure condition but provides no corresponding diagnostic result."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers and no prior repairs to assess."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate passes the reject-first gates and qualifies for deeper research. Its main remaining weaknesses concern comparative prior art, the incremental reframing claim, operational threshold calibration, and explicit screening for non-normal transient behavior."}