{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__environmental_climate","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"f5082073cf582c3e076f883ad07b20a567cec588bfa319d45fa57e5def06c577","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate specifies an independently recognizable monitoring failure involving coordinated ecological deterioration that escapes separate indicator thresholds."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The local transition operator, coupled modes, gain spectrum, stability partition, action map, residual checks, and drift controls closely preserve the archetype's structure."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Modal decomposition and stability analysis can expose a coupled warning pattern hidden from coordinate-wise monitoring, while sensitivity analysis connects that pattern to decision-relevant outcomes and feasible levers."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component has a domain realization, and selected mechanisms have coherent roles, counterfactual necessity statements, and safeguards against non-normality, residual omission, and drift."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Claims are explicitly bounded as hypotheses or inferences, effectiveness is not asserted as established, and uncertainty, conditioning, local validity, residual failure, and lack of prior-art evidence are disclosed."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether a reproducible coupled precursor exists, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether modal alerts outperform both the baseline and the nearest rival under frozen budgets."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The authorized activity is a shadow test using existing observations; consequential management actions remain with responsible authorities, affected parties are identified, prohibited actions are explicit, and halt conditions are reversible."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal translates the full modal workflow from transformation definition through decomposition, leverage mapping, residual control, drift monitoring, and retirement."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The state variables, seasonal and geographic bounds, ecological outcomes, governance context, nonlinear forcing, aggregation risks, and Indigenous authority concerns are specific to environmental monitoring."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The detection pathway is coherent, but estimated local modes may reflect forcing, seasonality, aggregation, or transient amplification rather than a durable transition process."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"All named components receive concrete environmental realizations with appropriate direct or adapted status and traceability to operational checks."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly addresses nonstationarity, nonlinear alternatives, sensor artifacts, ill-conditioning, near-degeneracy, non-normal transients, structured residuals, and mode rotation."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It replaces isolated threshold breaches with auditable monitoring of coupled dynamical directions, revealing warning information that coordinate-wise dashboards can systematically miss."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"A bounded shadow pilot, frozen thresholds, comparative benchmarks, measurable outcomes, and halt criteria are specified, though adequate records and reproducible local operators remain uncertain."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The shadow-only design offers potentially valuable lead-time gains with limited direct harm, while false alarms, resource diversion, aggregation harms, and authoritative overinterpretation remain material risks."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so no evidence supports a novelty claim."}},"weighted_total":87.5,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is the original attempt; neither the problem identifier nor the causal-lever identifier changed, and no prior repairs or improvements are recorded."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate passes every reject-first gate through strong structural translation, bounded causal claims, distinct falsifiers, and a reversible shadow-test design. Empirical effectiveness and novelty remain open research questions, but neither is presented as established."}