{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__library_information_science","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"611d6621cccb54fd35f65eeea26d15b5717f41e3ed22913fea452588d477e656","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The coupled underexposure problem is defined through observable discovery-system behavior and remains meaningful without the modal analogy."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal explicitly maps the update transformation, state, invariant directions, gains, intervention coordinates, residuals, drift, and validity limits into the library setting."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The intervention targets estimated propagation dynamics through permissible ranking controls, while replay and rival comparison test whether modal targeting adds leverage."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All archetype components receive operational translations, and selected mechanisms have distinct causal, testing, monitoring, or safety roles with coherent rejection of unsuitable alternatives."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical effectiveness and operator stability are labeled as hypotheses, prior art is marked unsearched, and no unsupported result is presented as established evidence."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The packet separately falsifies propagation of the problem and effectiveness of the mode-targeted intervention, including comparison against coordinate-level monitoring and direct constraints."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The authorized step is offline and deidentified, deployment authority is reserved to accountable library governance, excluded actions are explicit, and halt conditions preserve the existing configuration."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The transformation-to-mode-to-gain-to-control structure is complete, traceable, and bounded by residual and drift checks."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The formulation uses credible library discovery objects, objectives, governance roles, catalog constraints, retrieval utility, and representation concerns."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The feedback pathway and modal-control logic are plausible, but a fitted observational operator and replay may still confound ranking effects with query mix, catalog change, and contemporaneous intent."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every named component has a specific domain realization, including conditioning, coupling, interpretation, reconstruction, drift, and spectral separation."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate confronts nonstationarity, nonlinear behavior, catalog availability, confounding, mode swapping, residual harm, rival interventions, and loss of utility."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It materially shifts diagnosis from isolated exposure thresholds to coupled cross-cycle directions and makes hidden persistence an actionable monitoring target."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The offline design is bounded and comparative, but threshold values, estimation requirements, uncertainty procedures, and data sufficiency criteria remain to be specified before execution."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The offline first step limits immediate harm and has credible diagnostic value, while later control use retains fairness, privacy, representation, and relevance risks."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so no evidence supports a novelty claim."}},"weighted_total":87.5,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The preregistered thresholds and uncertainty procedures are named but not operationally fixed.","repair":"Before execution, specify residual budgets, utility floors, conditioning limits, spectral-gap rules, mode-alignment tolerances, and decision procedures for marginal modes.","evidence_boundary":"The packet establishes a sound test architecture but does not establish that available data can estimate these quantities reliably."},{"priority":"LOW","issue":"No prior-art evidence supports distinctiveness of the proposed composition in library discovery systems.","repair":"Conduct a scoped literature and practice review covering dynamic exposure feedback, spectral auditing, recommender-system stability, and library discovery governance.","evidence_boundary":"This affects novelty assessment, not the internal structural fit of the candidate."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior problem identifier, causal-lever identifier, or registered repair against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate clears every reject-first gate and satisfies the success conditions. Its strongest features are complete modal translation, explicit rival and falsifier design, and conservative offline authority boundaries; the principal unresolved issue is absent novelty research."}