{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__marine_science","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"588c5828b90559d852684a83f6144586d5d5466406818393c9ed7dd23579afc2","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal identifies a recognizable coastal-management problem—late and poorly targeted hypoxia warning—independently of the modal solution."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The fitted transition, coupled state, modes, gains, stability partition, intervention map, residual checks, drift monitoring, scope contract, coupling register, linearization window, and gap criterion preserve the archetype's structure."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal links validated modal growth to earlier observation and review of reversible responses, while sensitivity testing determines whether modes discriminate among feasible choices. It does not treat prediction alone as proof of control."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All archetype components receive domain realizations, and selected mechanisms retain their proper roles. The proposal explicitly distinguishes temporal eigenmodes, singular directions, variance components, and network centrality."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Unverified scientific claims are labeled as hypotheses or inferences, prior-art status is declared unsearched, and empirical validity is deferred to held-out and prospective testing rather than asserted."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Separate falsifiers address whether a coupled-precursor problem exists and whether modal targeting improves warning or choice discrimination over both baseline surveillance and a strong forecasting rival."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"A responsible agency retains authority, the initial study is advisory and reversible, automatic restrictions and ecosystem forcing are excluded, affected parties are identified, and explicit suspension conditions return operations to ordinary surveillance."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal translates the full invariant-mode workflow and its governance constraints into a coherent coastal transition-model design."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"State variables, seasonal forcing, advection, monitoring limitations, ecological impacts, feasible responses, and agency authority are specific to coastal hypoxia management."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Earlier validated detection can plausibly improve observation and response review, but mode-specific controllability remains an empirical hypothesis and is appropriately bounded."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every named component is operationalized, with traceability between mathematical objects, marine measurements, decision rules, and failure controls."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate confronts nonlinearity, external forcing, incomplete observation, non-normality, unstable mode identity, rival forecasts, structured residuals, and absent actionable leverage."},"reframing_gain":{"score":3,"reason":"It usefully shifts attention from isolated thresholds to coupled precursor directions, though conventional multivariate forecasting may capture much of the predictive benefit without modal interpretation."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"A bounded shadow pilot, archived and prospective evaluation, comparator methods, observables, and halt criteria are specified, while sampling adequacy and threshold values still require protocol development."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":4,"reason":"The advisory shadow deployment offers meaningful warning and targeting value with limited direct harm, reversible operation, retained human authority, and conservative rollback."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so no evidence supports a novelty claim."}},"weighted_total":86.25,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"Mode-specific action leverage is presently model-derived rather than independently demonstrated.","repair":"During the shadow pilot, preregister tests of whether candidate observations and feasible actions produce distinct, reproducible modal and outcome responses beyond the nearest rival.","evidence_boundary":"Sensitivity within a fitted local operator supports a testable prediction, not a causal management claim."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"No prior-art evidence establishes whether the proposed composition is novel relative to coastal hypoxia forecasting and dynamical-systems monitoring.","repair":"Conduct a scoped literature and implementation review before making any novelty claim.","evidence_boundary":"The unsearched classification supports no inference about originality."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers and no prior repair record against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is structurally complete, marine-specific, explicitly hypothetical, adversarially bounded, separately falsifiable, and safe enough for a reversible shadow pilot. Its main unresolved questions are empirical controllability and prior-art novelty, neither of which is misrepresented as established."}