{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__material_culture_museum_studies","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"f62d9ab9610328019253fb0199e087926dc5e391fa04fbcb8509ab094e1c2181","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Repeated recurrence and downstream exposure after record correction is a recognizable museum-workflow problem independent of modal terminology."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal specifies a bounded cycle-to-cycle transformation, coupled state coordinates, approximate invariant patterns, modal gains, intervention mapping, residual checks, and drift governance."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Sensitivity analysis and a reversible matched pilot connect persistent propagation patterns to coordinated workflow changes and distinguish leverage from mere modal prominence."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component has a domain realization, load-bearing mechanisms have explicit counterfactual roles, and rejected mechanisms are excluded for structurally relevant reasons."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical and causal statements are consistently bounded as hypotheses or inferences, prior-art status is disclosed as unsearched, and no unsupported result or authority claim is presented as established."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal separately falsifies the recurrence problem and the comparative benefit of the mode-targeted intervention against ordinary cleanup."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Decision authority remains with accountable museum and affected-community representatives; the first step is bounded and reversible, prohibited uses are explicit, and halt and rollback conditions are operational."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The transfer preserves the full transformation-mode-gain-intervention-residual structure and makes its domain correspondences explicit."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal treats catalog classifications as contested interpretations embedded in provenance, institutional power, community authority, preservation, and discoverability rather than as neutral labels."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The propagation account and comparative pilot are plausible, but the estimated operator may still absorb policy, staffing, semantic-coding, and upstream-rule confounding."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"All specified components are translated into identifiable catalog-workflow objects, rules, diagnostics, or governance constraints."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate names a strong non-spectral rival, an analogy boundary, operator-instability failure conditions, distinct falsifiers, and consequential residual risks."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It productively shifts attention from isolated erroneous records to coupled workflow patterns that can recreate classifications after cleanup."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"Audit logs, held-out reconstruction, a matched baseline, reversible manipulation, and halt criteria support testing, although feasibility depends on sufficiently dense and stable transition data."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"Read-only analysis, joint approval, an internal reversible pilot, provenance preservation, and rollback substantially constrain harm, while reification and consultation burdens remain material."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so distinctiveness within museum informatics, critical cataloging, and workflow-analysis literature is not established."}},"weighted_total":87.5,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"The transition operator could encode changing policy, staffing, coding choices, or a dominant upstream rule rather than stable coupled propagation.","repair":"Before intervention, estimate the operator across separated audit windows and compare it with explicit-rule and single-source models using held-out recurrence, conditioning, residual structure, and mode-stability criteria.","evidence_boundary":"The packet supplies a test design but no observed transition data establishing estimability, stationarity, or causal adequacy."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The proposal's novelty relative to existing museum catalog remediation and workflow-analysis methods is unknown.","repair":"Conduct a bounded prior-art review and state which combination of propagation modeling, modal targeting, community authority, and residual governance is genuinely distinct.","evidence_boundary":"The candidate explicitly marks prior art as unsearched, so novelty cannot be inferred from internal coherence."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is the original attempt, with no prior problem identifier, causal-lever identifier, or registered repair against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a structurally complete, domain-sensitive, falsifiable transfer with a credible reversible pilot and unusually strong authority safeguards. Its principal unresolved boundaries are empirical operator validity and unverified novelty, neither of which is disguised as established evidence."}