{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__medicine_healthcare","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"fba55ef1663e92b9f3f961b829c59ecdfc995fc62e57f0257e9482f5c741516f","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The independently meaningful clinical problem is delayed recognition of ward deterioration despite existing monitoring; it remains consequential even if the modal framing fails."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal explicitly translates the state transformation, invariant directions, modal response, selection rule, intervention map, residual checks, drift monitoring, and interpretation limits into the ward setting."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The review trigger acts on the proposed hidden coupled trajectory and is compared against usual monitoring and a nonlinear rival; the downstream clinical benefit is appropriately bounded as a hypothesis."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Load-bearing decomposition, sensitivity, stability, residual, and monitoring mechanisms form a coherent chain, while unsuitable mechanisms are rejected with specific structural reasons and non-normality, degeneracy, and local-validity limitations are retained."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Clinical effectiveness, prevalence, and novelty are not asserted as established; claims are labeled as hypotheses or inferences and the proposal requires locked retrospective and silent prospective validation."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether coupled temporal structure exists beyond ordinary thresholds and artifacts, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether the modal trigger improves warning utility over both baselines."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The authorized work is non-interventional and silent, clinicians retain care authority, existing alerts remain intact, excluded actions are explicit, and halt conditions preserve usual care as rollback."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The full invariant-mode architecture is translated with traceability, selection, residual, coupling, drift, gap, and scope controls."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The design directly addresses nonlinear physiology, treatment response, informative observation, subgroup disparities, workflow burden, privacy, and clinical authority."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Earlier review could plausibly improve care, but treatment and measurement processes may generate the apparent modes and the model-based perturbations do not themselves establish clinical causality."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every named component has a concrete domain realization and the adapted components preserve their original functional role."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate confronts the strongest rival, nonstationarity, ill-conditioning, degeneracy, artifacts, residual structure, subgroup failure, and lack of spectral separation with explicit tests or stop rules."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal shifts surveillance from isolated abnormalities and aggregate scores to joint trajectory directions while preserving original-variable traceability and a direct rival comparison."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The retrospective and silent-shadow sequence is operationally credible with measurable utility and validity criteria, though transition estimation and stable modal identification may be data-intensive."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":4,"reason":"Silent testing, unchanged usual care, clinician authority, bounded deployment, monitoring, and rollback sharply limit initial patient risk while preserving potential warning value."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so distinctiveness from existing dynamic deterioration and latent-state monitoring methods is unknown."}},"weighted_total":88.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"The modal trigger has no established empirical advantage over existing deterioration models.","repair":"Execute the locked validation against usual monitoring and the matched nonlinear rival, including temporal, unit, treatment-regime, and subgroup analyses.","evidence_boundary":"The packet supplies a test design and causal hypothesis, not observed comparative performance."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"Novelty and prior-art distinctiveness are unresolved.","repair":"Conduct a documented search of dynamic latent-state, switching-system, spectral, and longitudinal deterioration-warning methods before making novelty claims.","evidence_boundary":"The candidate explicitly records prior art as unsearched."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers, no prior repairs, and no earlier candidate against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"All reject-first gates pass. The proposal is a structurally complete, clinically bounded, falsifiable transfer suitable for empirical research; comparative effectiveness and novelty remain unestablished rather than inferred."}