{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__music_musicology","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"a3d90244e98d20eee55a214ff952c8f7833417ff5a0e919e2382a5fecada22c1","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The rehearsal problem is recognizable independently of the archetype: coupled deviations recur or migrate despite repeated correction of isolated symptoms."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal defines a rendition-to-rendition transformation, coupled state, approximate invariant directions, modal responses, selection rules, residual checks, drift monitoring, and bounded interpretation."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposed lever targets persistent outcome-relevant deviation combinations through conductor-approved cue bundles, with comparative outcomes and rollback criteria capable of distinguishing leverage from description."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All archetype components are translated coherently, load-bearing mechanisms retain their defining functions, and rejected mechanisms are excluded for reasons consistent with their limitations."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical and causal claims are explicitly bounded as hypotheses or inferences; uncertainty, conditioning, held-out validation, and the absence of prior-art evidence are disclosed without invented support."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The packet separately falsifies the coupled-recurrence problem and the incremental benefit of modal cueing, while also specifying a structural failure condition for the decomposition itself."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Recording and analysis require ensemble authorization, rehearsal decisions remain with the conductor, personnel-level uses are prohibited, exposure and workload are bounded, and concrete halt conditions are supplied."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate preserves the full transformation-mode-gain-intervention-residual-drift structure and explicitly handles local validity and non-normality."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The state variables, rehearsal actors, conductor authority, musical outcomes, intentional variation, and interpretive limits are specific and credible within ensemble practice."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Prospective cue perturbations and matched comparisons provide a plausible causal route, although learning, conductor strategy, limited stationarity, and intervention-induced adaptation may confound estimates."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every named component has a concrete domain realization, and the mechanism portfolio distinguishes causal, operational, testing, and safety functions."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly confronts nonstationarity, measurement artifacts, overfitting, mode swapping, descriptive-causal confusion, expressive suppression, and surveillance misuse."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It shifts rehearsal diagnosis from isolated audible errors to persistent coupled transition patterns and thereby suggests interventions unavailable to symptom-by-symptom correction or variance profiling."},"practicality_testability":{"score":2,"reason":"The bounded pilot and observables are testable, but estimating a well-conditioned transition operator and stable spectrum may require substantially more independent transitions than a short rehearsal program supplies."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"Potential rehearsal efficiency and stability gains are meaningful, while consent, conductor control, aggregate reporting, ordinary-intensity cues, and rollback rules limit foreseeable harm."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so no evidence supports a novelty claim."}},"weighted_total":85,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["practicality_testability","novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"Operator identifiability may fail if the state dimension is large relative to independent rendition transitions or if ordinary rehearsal actions change between observations.","repair":"Predefine a low-dimensional state, minimum effective sample requirement, regularization and conditioning rules, and a sampling design that records rehearsal actions as inputs or holds them sufficiently stable.","evidence_boundary":"The packet supplies no empirical sample-size, reliability, or identifiability evidence for this ensemble setting."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"Matched passages alone may leave conductor choice, passage difficulty, order, fatigue, and learning entangled with modal cue effects.","repair":"Pre-register passage matching, cue assignment, order balancing, blinded musical-quality assessment, and an analysis separating cue effects from passage and rehearsal-stage effects.","evidence_boundary":"The causal benefit remains a prospective hypothesis until comparative data survive these controls."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"Novelty and overlap with quantitative rehearsal analysis, performance-science modeling, and music-information-retrieval work are unknown.","repair":"Conduct a scoped prior-art review before making novelty or field-positioning claims.","evidence_boundary":"Unsearched status supports neither novelty nor absence of precedent."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior problem or causal-lever identifier and no registered repairs to assess."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a structurally complete, domain-grounded, falsifiable, and safety-bounded transfer. Its main unresolved weakness is operational identifiability in a short, adaptive rehearsal setting; novelty also remains wholly unevidenced."}