{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__nanotechnology","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"e69b15ac8d32d93889f5957e98d131748a9d486725facb321a58066bc0f217a2","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The synthesis problem is independently recognizable: coupled reactor and particle states can conceal impending aggregation or distribution widening from coordinate-wise alarms."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal preserves the archetype's transformation, modal basis, gain spectrum, consequence-based selection, intervention mapping, residual checks, drift monitoring, and bounded interpretation."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposed leverage follows a coherent chain from detecting weakly damped or growing quality-relevant modes to testing authorized actuator combinations that could damp them before endpoint failure."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All archetype components receive domain realizations, load-bearing mechanisms have explicit counterfactual roles, incompatible mechanisms are rejected for relevant reasons, and approximation limits are retained."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical and causal propositions are consistently marked as hypotheses or inferences, no experimental result or novelty claim is invented, and the packet states that validation remains necessary."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether coupled modal structure exists, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether modal guidance improves preregistered outcomes against both comparators and out of sample."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The first step is bounded, operators retain control, hard process and exposure limits remain authoritative, raw alarms are preserved, and explicit halt, rollback, and quarantine provisions are supplied."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The domain mapping closely preserves the archetype's coupled transformation, invariant directions, scalar response, modal control, and residual-governance structure."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"The reactor variables, particle-distribution outcomes, nucleation boundaries, aggregation risks, scale limits, and operator roles are credible for nanoparticle synthesis, though measurement and identifiability details remain process-specific."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Detection, sensitivity probing, and bounded damping form a plausible causal sequence, but success depends on local stationarity, controllability, observability, and protection against non-normal transient amplification."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every named component is translated into an operational nanotechnology counterpart with direct or justified adapted status."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly addresses nonlinear regime changes, sensor artifacts, contamination, ill-conditioning, non-normality, unsafe excitation, small spectral gaps, and failed out-of-sample benefit."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It materially shifts monitoring and intervention from visible coordinates and correlated deviation toward consequence-relevant dynamical combinations and their stability."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"Historical replay and a bounded small-scale pilot provide a feasible test path with comparators, outcomes, halt rules, and retained human authority, although instrumentation and estimation requirements may be demanding."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"Earlier warning and targeted correction could reduce off-spec production, while advisory-only use, exposure limits, rollback, and quarantine constrain foreseeable downside."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched and the packet supplies no evidence supporting a novelty judgment."}},"weighted_total":83.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The validation plan recognizes non-normal transient amplification but does not specify a diagnostic that distinguishes transient growth from eigenvalue-based stability.","repair":"Preregister a transient-amplification and conditioning check and require it to agree with, qualify, or veto the eigenmode warning rule before pilot guidance is used.","evidence_boundary":"The packet identifies the risk conceptually but provides no observed operator diagnostics or pilot results."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"Observability and actuator identifiability are assumed for several latent or proxy state variables.","repair":"Define sensor precision, missingness limits, excitation coverage, actuator-to-state rank criteria, and uncertainty thresholds that determine whether a mode is actionable.","evidence_boundary":"The proposed state and perturbation design is plausible, but process-specific measurement adequacy has not been demonstrated."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers, so no improvement relative to an earlier revision can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is structurally complete, domain-grounded, causally testable, and safely bounded. Its empirical efficacy and novelty remain unestablished, but those limits are disclosed rather than fabricated."}