{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__operations_research","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"d1da55849b37a2d20ebae13837eaafdb0ea75efce7203fcce40f66e85ae283f4","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The coupled-network congestion problem is independently recognizable without reference to modal terminology and has concrete actors, observations, consequences, and objectives."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal maps an explicit workload transformation, joint state, invariant modes, gains, intervention coordinates, residuals, drift, coupling, and validity limits to the archetype."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposed lever targets consequential modal gains through feasible controls and links those changes to later modal amplitude and service outcomes through a falsifiable intervention test."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All archetype components have domain realizations, load-bearing mechanisms have explicit counterfactual roles, and rejected mechanisms are distinguished on relevant technical grounds."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical effectiveness is consistently bounded as hypothetical, the operator assumption is exposed, validation is held out, and no unsupported factual evidence or fabricated authority is presented."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether coupled structure exists, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether the proposed control changes the target and improves outcomes without displaced harm."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Authority is assigned, the initial action is offline and reversible, affected parties and prohibited actions are identified, and explicit halt and rollback conditions constrain deployment."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The transformation-to-mode-to-control structure is complete and preserves residual, coupling, drift, and scope safeguards."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"Queueing, routing, workload, service-level, feasibility, and policy constraints are expressed in operations-research terms without reducing the problem to generic analytics."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The chain from controls to modal behavior and service outcomes is coherent, but depends on an unvalidated locally stable operator and movable modes."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every named component receives a specific operational realization, including selection, stability, residual, gap, coupling, and governance elements."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly addresses confounding demand shocks, nonlinearity, non-normality, mode swapping, displaced congestion, and inequitable effects."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It materially shifts diagnosis and intervention from visible individual queues to coupled workload directions that may reveal hidden amplification and displaced backlog."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The offline replay, shadow recommendation, matched comparison, and rollback path are feasible, though thresholds and estimation procedures remain to be preregistered."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"A reversible shadow-stage design offers useful early-warning and policy-screening value while containing operational risk, subject to equity and model-validity gates."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so no evidence establishes novelty relative to existing queueing, control, or network-stability methods."}},"weighted_total":87.5,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The pilot lacks fixed estimation, uncertainty, residual, conditioning, drift, and spectral-gap criteria.","repair":"Preregister the operator estimator, comparison windows, uncertainty procedure, thresholds, and decision rules before replay.","evidence_boundary":"These choices require pilot data and domain governance; they cannot be inferred from the closed-book packet."},{"priority":"LOW","issue":"Novelty relative to established queueing-network control and spectral methods is unknown.","repair":"Conduct a scoped prior-art review before making any novelty or differentiation claim.","evidence_boundary":"The packet marks prior art as unsearched and supplies no novelty evidence."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is the original attempt; neither the problem identifier nor the causal-lever identifier changed, and no prior repairs were supplied."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate passes every reject-first gate with a complete domain translation, a plausible but explicitly hypothetical causal lever, distinct falsifiers, and bounded authority. Remaining uncertainty concerns empirical calibration and prior-art novelty rather than structural fitness."}