{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__philosophy","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"7b48b738134173810a70b16279b2a7bb3ac1cbe084d0b562a96610c9b8d97ab3","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal identifies an independently recognizable review problem: thesis-by-thesis evaluation can miss coupled patterns of commitment revision, regardless of whether modal decomposition is adopted."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The bounded revision operator, joint-commitment directions, modal responses, intervention map, residual checks, and drift governance correspond coherently to the archetype without reducing the transfer to metaphor."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposed lever changes reviewer attention from isolated claims to empirically identified commitment combinations, and the comparative cue experiment directly tests whether that shift improves detection rather than assuming prediction alone is causal."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component is translated, load-bearing mechanisms have explicit counterfactual roles, unsuitable mechanisms are rejected for domain-specific reasons, and non-normality, conditioning, residuals, coupling, and local validity are retained."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical and causal claims are consistently bounded as hypotheses or inferences; prior art is disclosed as unsearched, and no unsupported result is presented as established evidence."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The packet separately falsifies the claimed problem advantage through baseline and static-network parity and the intervention through failure of mode-guided cues despite predictive modes."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The pilot is consent-based, nonbinding, reversible, and governed by participant withdrawal, retained human judgment, prohibited uses, independent stopping authority, and explicit rollback conditions."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal instantiates coupled state transformation, approximate modes, modal response, targeted perturbation, reconstruction residuals, spectral separation, and drift monitoring as an integrated design."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"It preserves the reason-responsive, semantic, reflexive, and contestable character of philosophical revision, although graded commitment vectors may still impose commensurability and coding conventions on heterogeneous arguments."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"A mode-targeted cue plausibly redirects scarce review attention toward coupled vulnerabilities, with a direct comparison against ordinary and network-guided review; the fitted observational operator remains vulnerable to confounding by genre, coding, and objection selection."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The full component set has concrete domain realizations, and the mechanism dispositions preserve distinctions among decomposition, stability diagnosis, sensitivity, reconstruction, reporting, and monitoring."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":3,"reason":"The design anticipates reflexivity, semantic reframing, unstable modes, coder dependence, non-normality, residual novelty, and rival explanations, but limited comparable episodes could still make the modal structure underidentified."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"The transfer changes review from inspecting salient claims independently to testing coupled directions of revision while explicitly separating descriptive structure from philosophical truth."},"practicality_testability":{"score":2,"reason":"The blinded comparative pilot, held-out prediction, cue outcomes, and stopping rules are runnable, but the small case set is not reconciled with state-vector dimension, operator estimation, regularization, coder reliability, or uncertainty calibration."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The intervention is advisory, bounded, reversible, and potentially useful for earlier detection; remaining risks include forced commensurability, school-dependent coding, chilling of residual novelty, and authority leakage from descriptive reports."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"The packet explicitly reports prior art as unsearched, so no evidence-backed novelty claim can be credited."}},"weighted_total":78.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["practicality_testability","novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The pilot does not specify a feasible relationship among commitment-vector dimension, available revision episodes, operator complexity, and uncertainty estimation.","repair":"Before execution, preregister a low-dimensional state construction or regularized operator class, minimum information requirements, coder-reliability criteria, and a simulation-based identifiability check.","evidence_boundary":"This is an operational limitation visible from the packet; whether adequate comparable data exist requires empirical study."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"No prior-art evidence supports novelty relative to computational argumentation, belief-revision modeling, or dynamic argument mapping.","repair":"Conduct a scoped literature search and state whether the contribution is a new problem formulation, a new intervention, or a synthesis of existing methods.","evidence_boundary":"Closed-book evaluation can identify the missing search but cannot infer its result."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is the original attempt, with no prior problem, causal lever, or registered repair against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a structurally faithful and domain-aware testable conjecture with distinct falsifiers and strong safeguards. Its main weaknesses are pilot identifiability and the complete absence of prior-art evidence, neither of which undermines the internal quality of the proposed bounded test."}