{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__sociology_anthropology","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"0365ab87ad5cdfbc79f3a6b9dff32260789fc0bf5f6c565adc90268fd6462d79","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The erosion problem is defined independently of the proposed modal method, with an ordinary-practice baseline and a falsifier under which coupled modeling adds no value."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal explicitly defines a repeated transition, coupled state, provisional invariant directions, modal responses, selection rules, interventions, residual checks, drift controls, and interpretation limits."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposed lever connects resident-approved action bundles to modal coordinates and tests that connection against raw outcomes, predicted mediation, a nearest rival, and subgroup harms."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component is translated, selected mechanisms have distinct functions and removal consequences, and rejected mechanisms are excluded for domain-relevant reasons."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical and causal claims are consistently bounded as hypotheses or inferences, prior-art status is disclosed as unsearched, and no unsupported result is presented as established evidence."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Separate problem and intervention falsifiers are operationalized, and the pilot distinguishes modal movement, raw-outcome improvement, mediation failure, rival performance, and harmful effects."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Authority is divided among lawful custodians, resident oversight, and service managers; coercive uses are excluded, and explicit suspension and rollback conditions protect affected parties."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The domain construction preserves the archetype's transformation, modal, intervention, residual, drift, and scope-control structure with strong traceability."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal treats collective efficacy as socially situated and contested, avoids individual inference and cultural essentialism, and embeds resident interpretation and consent."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The causal chain is coherent and experimentally challengeable, though observational transition estimates and simulated sensitivities do not themselves identify intervention effects."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"All named components receive concrete domain realizations, including uncertainty, subgroup residuals, coupling, local validity, and spectral separation."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate confronts reflexivity, nonlinearity, measurement construction, instability, confounding, spillovers, reification, and a strong nonmodal rival."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It shifts early warning from isolated indicator thresholds to coupled directions of social change while retaining raw outcomes and lived consequences as governing checks."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The bounded randomized-offer design is executable and preregisterable, but stable transition and mediation estimation may be demanding within the proposed pilot scope."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"Potential preventive value is meaningful and safeguards are unusually strong, while stigma, privacy, ecological inference, and institutional misuse remain consequential residual risks."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":1,"reason":"The transfer is plausibly distinctive, but prior art is explicitly unsearched and the packet supplies no comparative novelty evidence."}},"weighted_total":88.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no predecessor, unchanged identifiers, and no registered repairs from which improvement could be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"All reject-first gates pass. The candidate is structurally complete, domain-sensitive, causally bounded, falsifiable, and governed for a limited empirical test; its principal unresolved weakness is the absence of prior-art and novelty evidence."}