{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"layer_decay_and_expiration_management__cognitive_science","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"46be7716e7d3d33db7de1f5fb89b3f752ec63fd58d02d2f8bc7a652b57f53532","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The target problem is independently specified as stale episodic traces interfering with current inference while indiscriminate forgetting threatens provenance, rare-event recall, and continuity."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Temporally deposited traces, changing usefulness, differentiated lifecycle states, protected exceptions, dependency checks, reversible disposition, and audit markers preserve the archetype's central relations."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Reducing ordinary retrieval exposure for obsolete-context traces plausibly lowers interference, while restoration and rollback preserve access when classification is wrong; the proposed comparison against retrieval gating isolates the added lifecycle lever."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The component map is complete, and selected mechanisms retain their original functions after domain adaptation. Rejected mechanisms are excluded for reasons consistent with cognitive value and safety."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Effectiveness and transferred correspondences are explicitly bounded as hypotheses or inferences, prior-art status is disclosed as unsearched, and no empirical result is presented as established."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether obsolete-trace exposure causes measurable degradation, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether governed demotion improves outcomes relative to both the ordinary baseline and the nearest rival."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The authorized first test is sandboxed and reversible, irreversible deletion is excluded, affected parties and authority are named, protected holds override automation, and explicit halt-and-restore conditions are supplied."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal preserves accumulated deposits, changing validity, lifecycle classification, differentiated disposition, exceptions, dependency protection, boundedness, and surviving auditability."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"The proposal is well grounded in artificial episodic-memory systems and cognitive phenomena such as proactive interference and source confusion, while acknowledging that distributed behavioral influence weakens file-like independence assumptions."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Demoting stale-context traces from ordinary retrieval offers a credible interference-reduction pathway, but the benefit beyond context-sensitive retrieval gating remains an empirical hypothesis."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every archetype component receives a concrete trace-level realization, and the translations jointly form an executable lifecycle rather than a vocabulary substitution."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":3,"reason":"The candidate directly confronts delayed-value memories, distributed representations, false staleness, archive failure, privacy tension, and continuity effects, though dependency observability remains a serious unresolved limitation."},"reframing_gain":{"score":3,"reason":"The transfer reframes memory management from storage expansion or query-time relevance into governed state transitions with preservation, restoration, authority, and audit consequences."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"A reversible benchmark comparison, meaningful rivals, observable outcomes, rollback criteria, and restoration checks are supplied, but eligibility rules and operational bounds require prespecification."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The sandboxed shadow-labeling and reversible demotion test offers useful evidence with controlled exposure, while risks to rare memories, represented people, and behavioral continuity remain material."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"No prior-art search, citation set, or comparative novelty analysis is supplied, and the candidate correctly labels prior-art status as unsearched."}},"weighted_total":78.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"The novelty claim has no supporting evidence because relevant prior art was not examined.","repair":"Before claiming novelty, compare the lifecycle composition with episodic-memory consolidation, interference control, machine unlearning, archival memory, and retrieval-tiering approaches.","evidence_boundary":"The packet supports structural merit and testability but cannot establish novelty."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"A trace with no visible inbound references may still affect distributed learned behavior.","repair":"Define behavioral influence probes and require successful reversible isolation tests before treating dependency absence as support for destruction.","evidence_boundary":"The proposed dependency audit can inspect explicit references but does not prove representational independence."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"Eligibility, outcome bounds, and restoration fidelity are named but not operationally prespecified.","repair":"Pre-register stale-candidate eligibility, assignment procedures, evaluation windows, outcome measures, subgroup checks, and halt thresholds before experimentation.","evidence_boundary":"The design identifies suitable constructs but supplies no calibrated thresholds or validated detector performance."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior problem or causal-lever identifier and no registered repairs to compare."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a structurally faithful, domain-aware, falsifiable, and safety-bounded transfer suitable for deeper research. Its central empirical uncertainty is whether explicit lifecycle governance adds benefit beyond context-sensitive retrieval, and novelty remains wholly unevidenced."}