{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"layer_decay_and_expiration_management__environmental_climate","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"f4bc90f4db39befb4450fe0d937a924f802b2789b98175ad37fab6311fac251a","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The domain problem is independently specified as ambiguous accumulation of superseded climate-map editions, with observable consequences for evidence selection, maintenance, citation, and reproducibility."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Versioned map editions instantiate sequential deposits, differentiated retention value, stale authority, dependency-sensitive removal, explicit lifecycle states, and bounded active access with recoverable memory."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal acts on the identified failure through identity-resolved inventory, authoritative status, retention rules, holds, dependency gates, archival, reversible deletion, and restoration testing rather than relying only on presentation changes."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component receives a domain translation, and selected mechanisms retain their defining functions. Rejected cache, rotation, fixed-lifetime, and composite-age mechanisms are excluded for reasons consistent with the substrate."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Prevalence and effect claims are explicitly bounded as hypotheses or inferences, prior-art status is disclosed as unsearched, and no empirical success or unsupported external authority is asserted."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem audit can independently refute the alleged stale-edition burden, while the comparative shadow pilot can separately refute added intervention value relative to badge-and-ranking alone."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The first step is read-only, lifecycle authority is assigned, destruction requires additional clearance and review, unresolved dependencies and holds block removal, and halt and rollback conditions are explicit."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal reproduces the archetype's temporal stack, stale-active-layer hazard, retention tension, dependency safeguards, differentiated dispositions, and recoverability requirements without forcing the analogy."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"Map editions, lineage, citations, model vintages, public records, and reproducibility form a coherent climate-information substrate, although prevalence and institutional details remain unverified."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The causal sequence connects visibility, classification, authority, safe disposition, and restoration to reduced version ambiguity and bounded active access, but outcome effects still require testing."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is complete and preserves distinctions among detection, scoring, authority, dependency review, tiering, quarantine, tombstones, restoration, and revalidation."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate states strong counterevidence, a clear analogy boundary, independent falsifiers, mechanism-specific failure modes, affected parties, and credible stop conditions."},"reframing_gain":{"score":3,"reason":"It reframes obsolete-map handling from ad hoc labeling or deletion into lifecycle governance that separates operational authority from recoverable historical memory."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"A bounded shadow pilot, blinded selection comparison, dependency tracing, false-stale monitoring, and sampled restoration are feasible, though sampling plans and acceptance thresholds remain to be operationalized."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The read-only start and reversible pathways limit immediate harm while addressing plausible decision and maintenance costs; residual risks from missed dependencies, contested authority, and retention inequity are recognized."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so the packet provides no evidence that the composition or application is novel."}},"weighted_total":81.25,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The proposal has no prior-art evidence for novelty.","repair":"Conduct a bounded search of climate-data portal lifecycle practices, geospatial catalog versioning, records retention, and archive restoration, then distinguish any known equivalents from the proposed composition.","evidence_boundary":"Closed-book review can establish structural coherence but cannot establish novelty or absence of equivalent practice."},{"priority":"LOW","issue":"Pilot acceptance criteria are named but not operationally fixed.","repair":"Predeclare the sampling frame, authoritative-edition selection metric, dependency-coverage method, false-stale tolerance, restore targets, and comparison procedure before running the shadow pilot.","evidence_boundary":"The packet supports testability in principle but does not supply empirical calibration for acceptable thresholds."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior candidate, changed identifier, or registered repair against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a structurally faithful, domain-coherent, safety-bounded mechanism composition with distinct problem and intervention falsifiers. Its central remaining evidence gap concerns novelty rather than fit or causal design."}