{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"layer_decay_and_expiration_management__film_media_production","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"40b9a354a45bffb767f6cc00d1977a13d14fb1e8d879864a2c4ffe29771e4920","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The post-production asset-sprawl problem is independently specified through identifiable actors, artifacts, observable conditions, consequences, and an operational objective."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Successive production artifacts form a genuine temporal stack, with stale authority, bounded-storage pressure, differentiated retention value, and reconstruction hazards closely corresponding to the archetype."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Lifecycle classification, dependency gates, tier transitions, reversible quarantine, markers, and restore drills plausibly act on the stated causes rather than merely improving presentation."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component has a concrete domain realization, while selected mechanisms retain their distinctive functions and unsuitable mechanisms are rejected with coherent counterfactuals."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate distinguishes inference from hypothesis, declares prior art unsearched, avoids asserting measured effects, and states domain prevalence and benefits as unresolved empirical questions."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier separates lifecycle sprawl from naming and search defects, while the intervention falsifier compares measurable outcomes and harms against a persistent manual-sweep rival."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Authority is role-bounded, holds and disputed dependencies block destruction, the initial pilot is reversible, excluded actions are explicit, and halt-and-restore conditions address foreseeable irreversible harms."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal preserves temporal accumulation, changing usefulness, stale authority, differentiated disposition, dependency protection, boundedness, and recoverability as an integrated lifecycle structure."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The translation is specific to editorial, visual-effects, sound, delivery, archive, codec, relinking, rights, and remastering realities rather than generic records management."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The causal chain is coherent and guarded, although hidden external dependencies and unusable legacy execution environments could weaken the effect in practice."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is complete, domain-specific, internally consistent, and connected to selected mechanisms and lifecycle states."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly confronts metadata-only explanations, non-monotonic creative value, incomplete dependency visibility, archive rot, governance failure, and unmanaged quarantine or markers."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It productively reframes folder cleanup and storage pressure as authority-aware lifecycle governance with reconstruction, rights, and creative-history constraints."},"practicality_testability":{"score":4,"reason":"The bounded pilot defines eligible artifacts, comparison outcomes, reversible actions, restore exercises, decision roles, and explicit stopping conditions."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"Tiering and authority labeling offer credible operational value, while quarantine and holds reduce risk; residual danger remains from undiscovered dependencies and legacy-format failure."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is expressly unsearched, so no independent evidence supports novelty or differentiates the composition from established media-asset lifecycle practice."}},"weighted_total":90,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"Novelty and prior-art status remain wholly unverified.","repair":"Compare the full mechanism composition and its claimed differentiators against established media-asset management, digital-preservation, and post-production archival workflows before making any novelty claim.","evidence_boundary":"The closed-book packet supports structural evaluation only and supplies no external prior-art evidence."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The causal benefit remains a hypothesis despite a strong pilot design.","repair":"Run the bounded comparison and retain outcome-level evidence for retrieval, authority errors, active-tier burden, review effort, dependency misses, and restore failures.","evidence_boundary":"No measured baseline prevalence, effect size, or operational cost is included."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is the original attempt, with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers and no prior repairs against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is structurally strong, domain-grounded, causally coherent, falsifiable, and safely pilotable. Its principal unresolved boundary is external novelty and empirical-effect evidence, which is appropriately left unclaimed."}