{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"layer_decay_and_expiration_management__human_computer_interaction","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"cab495d71e895d2a8f3633b94ca4098e5f1a2181cb63955964d4bc94b6acd66b","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The notification-staleness problem is independently recognizable in human-computer interaction through obsolete actionable cues, attention burden, and socially distributed obligations."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Persistent notification artifacts correspond closely to sequential deposits, changed validity, stale active layers, differentiated disposition, retention exceptions, and bounded searchable history."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Source-state mismatch detection, active-visibility expiry, explicit state cues, and governed demotion directly target mistaken authority and triage burden; uncertain classification performance is isolated for testing."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component has a domain realization, and selected mechanisms retain their defining functions while rejected mechanisms are excluded for relevant structural reasons."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical effects and novelty are not asserted as established facts; claims are bounded as inference or hypothesis, prior-art status is disclosed, and uncertainty is carried into the pilot."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether accumulation causes impairment, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether lifecycle treatment improves outcomes without increasing missed alerts or comprehension failures."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Decision authority is divided appropriately, the initial trial is reversible and consent-based, protected alerts and holds are excluded, and explicit halt and restoration conditions are provided."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal preserves the archetype's temporal deposits, validity decay, active-versus-archived distinction, dependency checks, exceptions, reversibility, and bounded-stack invariants."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The translation centers interface cues, user attention, collaborative responsibility, accessibility, search behavior, and the social consequences of changing notification visibility."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The intervention acts on plausible mediators of stale action and triage burden, though reliable source-state inference and the behavioral effects of lifecycle labels remain empirical uncertainties."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is complete, specific, and operationally differentiated, including authority, restoration, dependency, exception, tiering, and stale-context functions."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":3,"reason":"The candidate identifies the strongest benign-history alternative, the socially distributed-value analogy break, classifier and retrieval failures, and countervailing harms, but those threats still require observation."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"Treating notifications as governed lifecycle artifacts expands the design space beyond filtering and manual clearing to explicit authority states, preservation paths, restoration, and accountable expiry."},"practicality_testability":{"score":4,"reason":"The shadow pilot is bounded, reversible, measurable against an ordinary baseline, and supplies concrete behavioral, comprehension, restoration, and safety outcomes."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The reversible first step offers meaningful attention and error-reduction upside with controlled exposure, while misclassification, hidden obligations, privacy, and accessibility risks remain consequential."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so no evidence establishes novelty beyond the candidate's internal synthesis."}},"weighted_total":87.5,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"Source-state coverage and lifecycle-label comprehension are unvalidated.","repair":"Predeclare coverage, disagreement, missed-valid-alert, cue-comprehension, and restoration acceptance criteria before running the bounded pilot.","evidence_boundary":"The packet supplies a test design and hypotheses, not observed performance."},{"priority":"LOW","issue":"Novelty relative to existing notification-management and records-governance systems is unknown.","repair":"Conduct a scoped prior-art review before making novelty or originality claims.","evidence_boundary":"The candidate accurately labels prior art as unsearched."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is the original attempt, with no prior problem identifier, causal-lever identifier, or registered repair to compare."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is structurally complete, domain-faithful, causally testable, and safely bounded. Its principal unresolved issue is novelty evidence, which does not undermine the internally valid and reversible evaluation proposal."}