{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"layer_decay_and_expiration_management__information_theory","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"0408b9e149dab03904a07f173da411b3dfc11ed695d8a27bfce96b7c8f911547","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The codebook-version problem is independently intelligible, domain-specific, and bounded by an explicit audit falsifier rather than merely restating the archetype."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Successive scheme versions form identifiable temporal deposits with differentiated active, decode-only, archived, quarantined, and deleted states; reference preservation supplies the required reconstruction constraint."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Reference-gated demotion and deletion directly reduce selectable-version clutter and mismatch opportunities while restore testing protects historical decoding."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The component map is complete and the selected mechanisms retain their defining operations, with clear load-bearing, supporting, and rejected roles."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Unverified deployment conditions are labeled as hypotheses, prior-art status is explicitly unsearched, and claims are bounded to structural inference without fabricated empirical support."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether the accumulation exists, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether lifecycle classification improves selection safety without impairing restoration."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The initial test is read-only and bounded, irreversible deletion is excluded, decision authority is named, and dependency, ownership, restore, and hold failures trigger rollback."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal preserves the full lifecycle structure: accumulated versions, supersession, differentiated retention, dependency-gated removal, reversible cleanup, and durable identity."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"Codebooks, source models, decoding fidelity, and encoder-decoder compatibility are faithful to information-bearing systems, though executable registries and storage operations partly inhabit computer-systems practice."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The lever plausibly separates new-encoding eligibility from historical decoding availability, but its benefit depends on the hypothesized presence of externally managed scheme versions and discoverable references."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every archetype component receives a concrete domain realization, and safety-critical components are translated into observable registry, dependency, restore, quarantine, and hold operations."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate identifies the self-contained-format boundary, rejects unsafe age-based expiry, states archive and dependency failure modes, and distinguishes a credible rival."},"reframing_gain":{"score":3,"reason":"Treating historical decoding schemes as governed lifecycle layers clarifies how to reduce active authority without confusing supersession with informational invalidity."},"practicality_testability":{"score":4,"reason":"The bounded corpus audit, reference trace, eligibility marking, archival sample, restore drill, and explicit halt conditions form an executable low-risk pilot."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The reversible pilot has favorable downside control and potentially useful registry simplification, while incomplete reference discovery and environment drift remain material hazards."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so no novelty claim has evidentiary support."}},"weighted_total":83.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The proposal provides no evidence that the targeted external scheme registries are prevalent or that the composition differs materially from established artifact-retention practice.","repair":"Research representative adaptive coding and archival systems, then document deployment prevalence, existing lifecycle controls, and the proposal's differentiating contribution.","evidence_boundary":"The current record supports a structurally coherent and testable hypothesis, not prevalence, effectiveness, or novelty claims."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is the original attempt; neither the problem identifier nor the causal-lever identifier changed, and no prior repairs were supplied."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is structurally complete, conditionally plausible, falsifiable, and safe to pilot. Its principal limitation is the absence of external prevalence and novelty evidence, which is acknowledged rather than fabricated."}