{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"layer_decay_and_expiration_management__library_information_science","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"9b743e17026cd02e07b0f5f3df56985a995f325ce75ddd657b9faa7706466f56","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate defines a concrete discovery-system problem with independently observable exposure, retrieval, and maintenance harms rather than merely renaming the archetype."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Successive metadata deposits, stale active records, differentiated retention value, dependency risk, reversible disposition, and preserved historical memory correspond directly to the archetype structure."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Identity resolution, staleness detection, lifecycle-state gating, and controlled disposition act on the stated cause of stale records remaining discoverable, while the pilot tests whether upstream failures instead dominate."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The component map is complete and domain-specific, and selected mechanisms retain their defining operations: detection, authoritative retention rules, dependency gating, reversible suppression, tombstones, and restoration testing."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical claims are explicitly bounded as hypotheses, prior-art status is declared unsearched, causal alternatives are acknowledged, and no unsupported effectiveness or novelty claim is presented as established fact."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether stale layers materially exist and cause harm, while the intervention falsifier separately tests comparative benefit and unacceptable operational harms."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The bounded pilot assigns decision authority, preserves specialist overrides, excludes irreversible and age-only actions, protects unresolved unique records, and specifies halt and restoration conditions."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal preserves the full lifecycle-decay pattern, including accumulated deposits, stale authority, differentiated disposition, dependency protection, boundedness, and retained memory."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"Cataloging, holdings, authority control, discovery indexes, preservation, records governance, citations, editions, and downstream metadata dependencies are translated with strong library-information-science specificity."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Removing or labeling adjudicated stale exposure should improve discovery reliability, but vendor feeds, authentication, and ranking may account for much of the observed burden."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"Every archetype component receives a recognizable domain realization, with adapted components preserving their functional role rather than relying on vocabulary substitution."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate confronts the cache analogy failure, upstream rival causes, identity-resolution limits, bias, false suppression, archival failure, sensitive tombstones, and conflicting destruction obligations."},"reframing_gain":{"score":3,"reason":"It usefully reframes episodic link repair and cleanup as governed lifecycle-state management, though several constituent practices are already recognizable within library operations."},"practicality_testability":{"score":4,"reason":"The bounded comparative pilot specifies population, treatment limits, adjudication, outcomes, harm measures, restoration checks, authority, exclusions, and rollback criteria."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"Reversible actions and specialist review make the initial test proportionate, while false suppression, labor burden, hidden dependencies, and governance conflicts remain meaningful risks."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched and the packet supplies no comparative evidence establishing novelty of the composition."}},"weighted_total":87.5,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The composition has no novelty or prior-art evidence.","repair":"Before making a novelty claim, compare the integrated workflow with established catalog maintenance, electronic-resource management, digital preservation, and records-retention practices.","evidence_boundary":"This gap does not invalidate the closed-book structural or causal proposal, but it prevents any supported novelty conclusion."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior problem identifier, causal-lever identifier, or registered repair to compare."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"All reject-first gates pass. The candidate is structurally complete, domain-faithful, causally testable, reversible, and appropriately bounded; deeper research is warranted primarily to establish prior art and novelty."}