{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"layer_decay_and_expiration_management__mathematics","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"b92ed6a7feea840d3159529701cae8ce063cd3852bfeb0e7511fa122f84ece83","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate identifies an independent formal-library governance problem involving superseded artifacts, ambiguous authority, dependency risk, and reproducibility obligations rather than merely restating the archetype."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Successive formal artifacts behave as accumulated temporal layers, with explicit counterparts for supersession, active-state ambiguity, preservation exceptions, archival disposition, and reconstruction-safe retirement."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The intervention acts on the stated causes by making artifact status visible, applying lifecycle classes, checking dependencies and reconstruction paths, and separating active resolution from preservation."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All archetype components receive domain-specific translations, and the selected mechanisms form a coherent detection, classification, dependency-gating, reversible-retirement, marking, and restoration chain. Unsuitable age-only and access-only mechanisms are explicitly rejected."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical prevalence and effect size are explicitly identified as unobserved, substantive mappings are labeled as inference or hypothesis, and no fabricated study, measurement, authority, or prior-art claim is presented."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem can be falsified by an audit showing negligible stale-active artifacts or consequences, while the intervention can independently fail against deprecation-only review or by missing a known live dependency."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Authority is assigned to maintainers with review for contested cases; the initial test is read-only, irreversible deletion is excluded, and explicit halt and rollback conditions protect downstream users and preserved results."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The temporal accumulation, supersession, stale authority, dependency-sensitive disposition, preservation exceptions, and bounded active stack correspond closely to the archetype."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"The proposal respects enduring mathematical validity and confines decay to artifact currency and interface authority, though much of the operating substrate belongs to formal-library engineering adjacent to mathematics."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The chain plausibly reduces ambiguity and unsafe cleanup through status metadata and dependency gates, but its prevalence and comparative benefit remain untested."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is complete, specific, and generally preserves each component's functional role without treating theorem truth as age-decaying."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate states the strongest missing-evidence objection, the central analogy break, boundary failures, independent falsifiers, and credible operational risks."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It productively reframes deprecation and version preservation as a governed lifecycle that distinguishes active authority from reconstructive retention."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"A bounded read-only shadow classification with a rival policy, dependency checks, and rollback is feasible, although measurement definitions and decision thresholds still require preregistration."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The reversible pilot offers useful evidence at low initial risk, while hidden dependencies, metadata burden, and preservation creep remain material concerns."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so no novelty claim is supported."}},"weighted_total":83.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior problem or causal-lever identifier and no claimed revision to attribute."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a structurally strong and carefully bounded transfer. It preserves the distinction between mathematical validity and artifact currency, supplies a coherent reversible lifecycle intervention, and is ready for empirical prevalence testing and prior-art research."}