{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"layer_decay_and_expiration_management__political_science","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"e8d5a66241a02088a47e4f7d9947aedf3097989f2a2db9cf840c4cb39256fbab","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate targets persistent emergency-rule accretion and status ambiguity, not the lifecycle archetype itself, and states observable conditions under which that political problem would be absent."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Emergency measures form an identifiable temporal stack, and the proposal preserves the archetype's inventory, aging, expiration, dependency, exception, disposition, and reconstruction structure without treating legal texts as ordinary disposable data."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The intervention changes the default from passive persistence to triggered, authorized review, with dependency and authority gates leading to differentiated lifecycle dispositions. The chain is plausible, though its behavioral effects remain untested."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"All core components receive domain-specific realizations, load-bearing mechanisms retain their distinctive functions, incompatible popularity-based eviction and blind rotation are rejected, and archival access is kept separate from legal validity."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical prevalence, baseline practice, and effects are explicitly bounded as hypotheses; prior-art status is disclosed as unsearched; and the candidate does not present unsupported findings or citations as established evidence."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether status ambiguity and consequential misclassification actually exist, while the intervention falsifier separately tests reviewer agreement, dependency-gate recall, and improvement over ordinary sources."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Legal status changes are reserved to duly empowered institutions, the initial pilot is read-only and nonbinding, records destruction and unauthorized repeal are excluded, affected parties are named, and halt and reinstatement conditions are specified."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The temporal stack, stale authority, retention-removal tension, lifecycle states, dependency gates, exceptions, successor markers, and reconstructable records closely preserve the source structure."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The translation recognizes legality, institutional competence, rights, reliance interests, political contestation, judicial constraints, and the distinction between public access and operative authority."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Visibility, mandatory review triggers, dependency checks, and authorized disposition plausibly reduce default persistence and classification error, but political obstruction, strategic renewal, and implementation compliance remain empirically unresolved."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is comprehensive and functionally differentiated, with careful adaptations for review capacity, lawful delayed effect, archival retrieval, consolidation, and status resolution."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate states strong counterevidence, an analogy break, mapping failure conditions, separate falsifiers, mechanism-specific failure modes, and several distributional and governance risks."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"The lifecycle lens converts scattered sunset and repeal debates into a governed stack-management problem while preserving the distinctly political questions of authority, legitimacy, rights, and institutional dependency."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The shadow audit is bounded, read-only, measurable, and authority-safe, but reliable dependency tracing and status coding may require substantial legal access, expertise, and interinstitutional cooperation."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"A nonbinding pilot offers useful diagnostic value with limited direct harm, while later implementation would still face risks from strategic exceptions, renewal obstruction, sensitive dependency disclosure, and disruption of relied-upon protections."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"The candidate explicitly reports that prior art has not been searched, so distinctiveness from existing sunset, emergency-powers review, and legal-register practices is unsupported."}},"weighted_total":87.5,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The causal account does not yet establish whether status ambiguity, rather than political incentives or enforcement discretion, is the dominant source of persistent emergency authority.","repair":"Use the shadow pilot to separate classification failures from deliberate renewal, nonenforcement, strategic ambiguity, and institutional noncompliance before attributing effects to lifecycle governance.","evidence_boundary":"The packet labels prevalence and baseline claims as hypotheses and supplies no observed jurisdictional results."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The proposal's distinctiveness from established sunset clauses, emergency-powers registries, legislative review systems, and legal archiving practices is unknown.","repair":"Conduct a bounded prior-art comparison that identifies which proposed combination or causal function is absent from established practice.","evidence_boundary":"Prior-art status is explicitly unsearched, so no novelty conclusion is warranted."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers and no prior repairs against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a structurally faithful and politically sophisticated transfer with explicit authority limits, reversible testing, differentiated lifecycle states, and strong falsifiers. Its main unresolved issues are empirical causal validation and prior-art evidence, neither of which is disguised as established fact."}