{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"layer_decay_and_expiration_management__speech_language_pathology","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"df033b3561c4e2f1a85f33a1eac8e9de24227127a9e91e8a11f9eadf9d62ed30","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The clinical problem is independently recognizable: conflicting generations of swallowing guidance can coexist across longitudinal artifacts, regardless of the source archetype."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Recommendation generations instantiate sequential deposits, changing validity, stale active visibility, preservation obligations, explicit lifecycle states, and reversible disposition without relying on deletion as the primary analogy."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Identity resolution, authorized currency review, supersession markers, and visibility tiering plausibly reduce routine selection of obsolete guidance; the proposal also isolates detection, adjudication, and display effects for testing."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component receives a domain realization, load-bearing mechanisms have explicit contributions and removal counterfactuals, and unsafe mechanisms such as fixed expiry and blind rotation are rejected for domain-specific reasons."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Clinical prevalence, efficacy, workflow feasibility, and retention rules are explicitly unverified; assertions are labeled as inference or hypothesis, no legal periods or empirical effects are invented, and the initial study is framed as evidence generation."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether meaningful stale-guidance conflict exists, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether lifecycle handling improves selection against both current practice and a simpler reconciled-order rival."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Clinical currency remains with authorized clinicians, records disposition remains with governance authorities, the first step is read-only simulation, prohibited actions are explicit, and halt conditions preserve the unchanged record."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal preserves the full lifecycle structure, including inventory, aging, supersession, exception handling, reversible demotion, restoration, and auditability."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"The adaptation respects clinical authority, individualized risk, distributed documentation, and preservation duties, though actual workflow conventions and governance constraints remain locally unverified."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Reducing active-facing ambiguity should improve current-guidance selection, but the magnitude depends on whether clinicians actually consult the conflicting artifacts rather than a dominant order view."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is complete and functionally translated, with attention replacing storage capacity where appropriate and direct transfer avoided where clinically unsafe."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate states a strong rival, analogy break, separate falsifiers, identity and authority failure conditions, and multiple concrete harms that could reverse the expected benefit."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It reframes copied-forward guidance from a generic reconciliation or alert problem into governed lifecycle management that preserves lineage while differentiating current authority from historical access."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"A bounded shadow evaluation with expert adjudication, simulated display changes, rollback, and comparison conditions is executable, although cross-artifact identity resolution may require substantial local integration."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The read-only first step offers useful diagnostic value with limited direct clinical exposure, while later deployment would require strong safeguards against concealed current guidance, privacy leakage, and added review burden."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior-art status is explicitly unsearched, so the distinctiveness of the intervention relative to existing EHR reconciliation, order-display, and documentation-governance systems is unknown."}},"weighted_total":83.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"HIGH","issue":"The proposal has no evidence about prior implementations or conceptual overlap with existing clinical reconciliation and EHR display systems.","repair":"Conduct a bounded prior-art review covering dysphagia order reconciliation, copied-forward clinical text, supersession displays, longitudinal recommendation registries, and records lifecycle governance before claiming novelty.","evidence_boundary":"The packet supports structural distinctiveness only; it does not establish historical or implementation novelty."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The causal effect depends on stale artifacts influencing real decisions rather than merely coexisting harmlessly.","repair":"During shadow evaluation, record which artifact clinicians consult, whether conflicts alter selection time or accuracy, and whether the simpler current-order banner performs as well as lifecycle management.","evidence_boundary":"The proposed causal pathway is plausible but has no supplied observational or comparative outcome evidence."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior repair cycle; neither the problem identifier nor the causal-lever identifier changed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate clears the reject-first gates through strong structural correspondence, clinically bounded mechanism adaptation, distinct falsifiers, and conservative authority controls. It merits deep research because efficacy, local feasibility, and novelty remain unverified rather than because the conceptual mapping requires repair."}