{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"negative_space_design__astronomy_astrophysics","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"b65e72bbeb098935a0996ef1b52313d68de8e45463aa8e00b6105e6afcbc59fa","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The candidate identifies an independently intelligible spectroscopy problem: unstable baseline estimation when usable reference channels are unavailable or uncertain. The observable instability criterion and problem falsifier prevent the analogy from defining the problem circularly."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Protected spectral intervals, explicit boundaries, preserved context, diagnosed emptiness, and reversible exclusions correspond coherently to the archetype. The fit is imperfect because line absence is discovered rather than manufactured, but the candidate states and tests that limitation."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Cleaner reference channels can constrain the baseline used to distinguish instrumental or continuum structure from target emission. Held-out residuals and injected-signal recovery directly test whether that leverage improves measurement rather than merely changing presentation."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component receives a domain realization, and the selected mechanisms retain their relevant boundary, recoverability, diagnosis, or omission logic. Peripheral presentation and social mechanisms are explicitly rejected instead of being forced into the proposal."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Unverified scientific and effectiveness claims are bounded as hypotheses or inferences, prior-art status is declared unsearched, and no citations, prevalence claims, or empirical outcomes are fabricated."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether reference-space scarcity actually matters, while the intervention falsifier separately tests protected windows against both the ordinary baseline and the joint-model rival."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The pilot authority is bounded, raw spectra and provenance remain recoverable, downstream states remain distinguishable, and explicit halt conditions address broad emission, structured residuals, data loss, and comparator underperformance."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":3,"reason":"The transfer preserves protected absence, boundaries, positive-form support, and recoverability. Its main limitation is that astrophysical emptiness cannot be guaranteed by design and must remain an empirical classification."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"The proposal respects channel contamination, broad-line occupancy, calibration failures, finite bandwidth, baseline-model sensitivity, and instrument-specific variation. Representative empirical support is intentionally absent."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Reference windows plausibly improve local baseline identification and therefore line recovery, while the candidate appropriately recognizes cases where nonlocal structure or a joint model defeats that chain."},"component_translation":{"score":3,"reason":"The full component set is translated into operational spectral-analysis terms. The rest-and-pacing translation is weaker than the boundary, omission, diagnosis, and recoverability mappings."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate states the strongest rival, analogy break, failure conditions, distinct falsifiers, major risks, and rollback logic without insulating the proposal from a negative result."},"reframing_gain":{"score":3,"reason":"The framing converts informal post-inspection channel choice into protected, predeclared, diagnosed, and auditable reference space with explicit erosion and reintroduction rules."},"practicality_testability":{"score":4,"reason":"An existing-dataset pilot, preregistered window schemes, synthetic injections, held-out residuals, comparators, provenance, and halt criteria form a feasible discriminating test."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The pilot is reversible and could reduce measurement bias, while bandwidth tradeoffs, missed broad emission, confirmation bias, and limited transportability remain material but bounded."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so no novelty or differentiation claim is supported."}},"weighted_total":76.25,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The proposal has no prior-art evidence establishing whether protected or preregistered line-free windows differ from established spectral-baseline practice.","repair":"Before making novelty claims, compare the complete intervention bundle against documented observing and reduction practices across relevant instruments and line regimes.","evidence_boundary":"The closed-book record supports structural coherence and pilot testability, but not novelty, prevalence, or empirical superiority."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is the original attempt, with no prior candidate, addressed repair, or changed problem or causal-lever identifier from which improvement could be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate passes the reject-first gates and presents a coherent, reversible, falsifiable transfer centered on empirically validated reference windows. Its principal unresolved weakness is the complete absence of novelty evidence, which does not undermine the bounded pilot claim."}