{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"negative_space_design__earth_sciences","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"4b9337995f4470f92692179ee818fc4305b810f0938c59e2522681cccc074f14","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The map-crowding problem is independently observable through overlay intersections, excessive navigation, overlooked trace continuity, and interpretation errors without relying on the design analogy."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Competing overlays, bounded exclusion corridors, focal geological geometry, visible absence boundaries, recoverability, and audience testing preserve the archetype's defining correspondence."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposal identifies a plausible perceptual pathway from selective local suppression through reduced visual competition to improved recognition of continuity and intersection geometry, with contextual-error controls."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component has a domain realization, and the selected mechanisms have distinct causal, operational, or safety roles with explicit counterfactual-removal consequences."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical benefits and novelty are explicitly unverified; substantive transfer claims are labeled as hypotheses or inferences, and no citations, search claims, or fabricated findings are asserted."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether crowding exists and predicts error, while the intervention falsifier separately requires protected corridors to beat both the ordinary view and the restyling rival without added context errors."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The first step is read-only and consenting, source data remain unchanged, stewards define nonsuppressible layers, operational use is excluded, and explicit halt and rollback conditions protect affected users."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The transfer uses deliberate, bounded absence as the active intervention and retains omission discipline, positive-form linkage, protected space, interpretation checks, and recoverability."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal is grounded in geological-map layers, trace continuity, contacts, faults, intersection geometry, provenance, uncertainty, scale, and downstream hazard-sensitive interpretation."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Reducing local mark competition plausibly improves geometric reading, but the net benefit over expert symbology and rapid layer control remains an empirical hypothesis."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is complete and operationally specific, including boundaries, state semantics, reintroduction, accessibility, and preservation of geological context."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly addresses expert-density needs, evidentiary blankness, selection bias, hidden-context errors, accessibility failure, and a credible styling rival."},"reframing_gain":{"score":3,"reason":"It reframes map decluttering as protected and semantically labeled absence rather than generic simplification, yielding clearer safeguards and a sharper experimental contrast."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"A reversible crossover study with matched excerpts, multiple comparators, measurable outcomes, and rollback criteria is feasible, though corridor generation and representative task sampling need specification."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The read-only trial has limited downside and potentially useful accuracy and efficiency gains, while suppression bias is bounded through nonsuppressible context, immediate restoration, and stopping rules."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior-art status is explicitly unsearched, so no closed-book evidence supports a novelty claim."}},"weighted_total":85,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The method for generating scale-aware corridors and selecting task-nonessential overlays is underspecified, which could introduce operator-dependent bias.","repair":"Before empirical deployment, preregister corridor construction, layer-eligibility rules, task sampling, and analysis criteria while retaining the proposed reversibility and safety constraints.","evidence_boundary":"This is an operational specification gap, not evidence that the proposed causal effect exists or fails."},{"priority":"LOW","issue":"No prior-art or novelty evidence is available.","repair":"Conduct external literature and product-practice research before making novelty or uniqueness claims.","evidence_boundary":"Closed-book evaluation supports structural coherence only and cannot establish novelty."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers, so no improvement over an earlier attempt can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a structurally faithful, domain-specific, falsifiable, and safely bounded transfer. Its empirical effect and novelty remain unverified, but those uncertainties are accurately bounded and do not defeat the proposed read-only test."}