{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"negative_space_design__human_computer_interaction","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"d646f0353042ba3a48090a4c2e5f5dc38994d54f61ea139c4a5e9be0fda1e11c","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The authoring-workspace problem is independently specified through actors, observable crowding, consequences, baseline conditions, and a problem falsifier; it is not merely a restatement of the archetype."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The mapping preserves the defining structure of deliberate omission, protected absence, positive-form clarification, bounded recovery, context preservation, and audience validation."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The proposed lever directly removes mapped attention competitors, protects the resulting perimeter, and preserves rapid recovery; the test can distinguish this pathway from ordinary progressive disclosure."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component has a concrete domain realization, and selected mechanisms have differentiated causal, operational, or guardrail roles with meaningful counterfactual-removal statements."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical effects are explicitly bounded as hypotheses or inferences, prior-art status is marked unsearched, and no unsupported study result or authority claim is presented as established evidence."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether chrome competition exists, while the intervention falsifier separately tests whether reversible hiding improves continuity without degrading access, comprehension, completion, or accessibility."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The prototype is opt-in and participant-controlled, critical status and semantic access are exempted, veto authority is assigned, and concrete halt and rollback conditions protect affected users."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal instantiates protected, purposeful, bounded, recoverable absence rather than generic minimalism or broad load reduction."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal is grounded in recognizable interface states, multimodal interaction paths, accessibility constraints, workspace context, and comparative usability measures."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The mechanism from mapped competition through reversible hiding to perceptual isolation is coherent, though its behavioral effect remains an empirical hypothesis."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The component map is complete and operational, including state interpretation, critical-context preservation, reintroduction, accessibility, and effect validation."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate addresses rapid task switching, poor information architecture, small displays, undiscoverability, state confusion, critical-status loss, and misleading telemetry with explicit tests or guardrails."},"reframing_gain":{"score":3,"reason":"It reframes focus mode as governed negative space with protected boundaries and recoverability, although the underlying interface pattern is already familiar."},"practicality_testability":{"score":4,"reason":"The authorized prototype has a bounded comparison, observable outcomes, affected-user coverage, rollback criteria, and no production-default commitment."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The intervention is reversible and potentially useful, with material accessibility and status-awareness risks constrained by exemptions, user control, and immediate rollback."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so distinctiveness relative to existing focus-mode and distraction-free authoring designs is not evidenced."}},"weighted_total":87.5,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The candidate establishes structural merit but provides no prior-art evidence for novelty beyond familiar focus-mode and distraction-free authoring patterns.","repair":"Before claiming novelty, compare the protected-boundary, state-signaling, critical-status exemption, and multimodal-recovery bundle against existing authoring interfaces and relevant HCI literature.","evidence_boundary":"This closed-book evaluation supports structural qualification only and does not establish empirical effectiveness or novelty."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior repair or identifier change from which improvement could be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a strong, domain-specific translation of negative-space design with a coherent reversible-hiding mechanism, complete component coverage, distinct falsifiers, and appropriate accessibility and authority safeguards. Empirical benefit and novelty remain unestablished, but those boundaries are disclosed and do not undermine structural qualification."}