{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"negative_space_design__innovation_entrepreneurship","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"27a4c735c873ce6c8ec9735383987d7f61dc724008ff9f73acbc7af7b78fbe52","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The discovery-interview distortion is defined through observable founder behavior, participant evidence, and decision consequences independently of the archetype."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Founder contributions are credibly mapped as attention competitors, participant-originated accounts as the positive form, and bounded silence as protected absence with explicit boundaries and recovery."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The intervention plausibly changes who controls response formation, and the neutral-script rival isolates protected silence from improved wording alone."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component has a domain realization, the load-bearing mechanism is identified, supporting mechanisms have distinct roles, and irrelevant mechanisms are rejected with counterfactual checks."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical prevalence and effects are consistently bounded as hypotheses, prior-art status is disclosed as unsearched, and no unsupported authority or effectiveness claim is presented as established."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Separate problem and intervention falsifiers use blind transcript coding, protocol adherence, behavioral correspondence, a baseline, and a nearest rival capable of defeating the proposal."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Participant consent, pass and stop authority, accessibility, privacy, bounded piloting, halt conditions, rollback, and prohibited coercive uses are explicitly specified."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"Absence is the active intervention: founder speech is withheld within a protected response interval so participant-generated evidence can become legible."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal is grounded in customer discovery, founder bias, behavioral evidence, product commitment, interview protocols, and startup research authority."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The initiative-transfer mechanism is coherent and rival-separated, but its effect on evidence validity remains an explicitly untested hypothesis."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The complete component set is translated into identifiable protocol, transcript-coding, boundary, recovery, context, and validation functions."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate directly addresses social interpretation, power, culture, neurodiversity, nonverbal leading, privacy, attrition, and false authenticity in its tests and safeguards."},"reframing_gain":{"score":4,"reason":"It productively reframes interview bias as crowding of participant response formation and makes protected conversational vacancy an independently testable design variable."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"A bounded crossover pilot, observable transcript measures, comparison conditions, and rollback are feasible, though calibration and behavioral follow-up require further operational specification."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The intervention is reversible and potentially improves costly early decisions, while recognized coercion, privacy, and interpretation risks are constrained but not eliminated."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"The candidate expressly reports prior art as unsearched, so no evidence supports a novelty claim."}},"weighted_total":87.5,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior problem identifier, causal-lever identifier, or registered repair to compare; neither identifier is reported as changed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate passes every reject-first gate through a strong absence-based mapping, a distinct causal rival, comprehensive mechanism discipline, explicit falsifiers, and participant-centered safeguards. Its principal evidentiary limitation is the disclosed absence of prior-art research, while effectiveness remains appropriately framed for empirical testing."}