{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"negative_space_design__physics","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"8bc3ae4d2ca772f1ca5382aa7cfa113eb42549ca653dd92d9b722c9eaa4b6743","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The pulse-correlated contamination, biased estimation, and detector-recovery problem is defined through domain-observable conditions independently of the design archetype."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The mapping preserves deliberate omission, a protected interval, explicit boundaries, preserved context, recoverability, and an effect test tied to the later measurement window."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Detector gating can prevent saturation while a no-drive interval permits pulse-correlated artifacts to decay; the proposal correctly conditions benefit on the target signal surviving that interval."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component receives an operational physics realization, and selected mechanisms have stated causal, operational, or test-design roles with counterfactual-removal checks."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical effectiveness and problem prevalence are not asserted as established facts; inferential and hypothetical claims are labeled, novelty is unclaimed, and the missing measurements are assigned to a bounded pilot."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The problem falsifier tests whether relevant contamination exists or is temporally separable, whereas the intervention falsifier compares measurement performance against both the baseline and the waveform-model rival."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The first step is reversible and authorized, safety telemetry and interlocks remain active, unobserved dynamics cannot be inferred, and explicit halt and rollback conditions are supplied."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"Protected temporal absence actively separates the preparation event from the scientific observation window while retaining the boundaries and contextual relationship essential to the archetype."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":3,"reason":"The proposal uses credible pulsed-measurement concepts, controls, recovery diagnostics, detector protection, and matched-sensitivity comparisons, though no apparatus-specific recovery model is yet available."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"The proposed chain is physically credible for detector saturation and decaying ring-down, with the central tradeoff between contamination suppression and lost early dynamics made explicit."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"The full component set is translated into controller behavior, metadata, diagnostics, preserved records, thresholds, validation measures, and recovery rules rather than remaining metaphorical."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate identifies a potentially dominant model-based rival, states the observability-breaking disanalogy, and supplies decisive failure conditions and comparison criteria."},"reframing_gain":{"score":2,"reason":"Treating dead time as protected and interpretable absence clarifies protocol design, but detector blanking and post-pulse settling are already natural measurement strategies, limiting conceptual gain."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"A reversible pilot with blanks, blinded injections, alternative holdoffs, matched sensitivity, rollback, and pipeline checks is feasible, although thresholds and tolerances remain apparatus-specific."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The pilot limits exposure and preserves safeguards, while the principal scientific risk—irrecoverable loss of fast dynamics—is recognized and directly tested."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched and no evidence establishes novelty relative to existing detector-gating, pump-probe, or transient-measurement protocols."}},"weighted_total":78.75,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is the original attempt with unchanged problem and causal-lever identifiers, no prior repair registry, and no earlier candidate against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is a structurally faithful and safety-bounded transfer whose proposed pilot can distinguish useful temporal isolation from destructive loss of observability. Apparatus-specific effectiveness and novelty remain unestablished, but both are bounded rather than fabricated."}