{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp03_full320_20260801","cell_id":"negative_space_design__robotics_automation","trajectory_id":"R","attempt_index":0,"candidate_sha256":"ca30c7df118361bd99332514ce29e5a690ce1c23ca32aaa4014707052d87a3fe","gates":{"G1":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The missed-event problem is independently recognizable in multi-robot supervision and does not depend on the archetype for its existence."},"G2":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Crowding, protected absence, positive-form isolation, interpretable empty states, bounded omission, and recoverability have explicit domain counterparts."},"G3":{"status":"PASS","reason":"The intervention directly reduces attention competition while preserving persistent safety and state context; the claimed effect remains appropriately hypothetical."},"G4":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Every archetype component is translated, load-bearing mechanisms have explicit counterfactual roles, and rejected mechanisms are excluded for domain-relevant reasons."},"G5":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Empirical claims are labeled as hypotheses or inferences, prior art is declared unsearched, and no unsupported performance or novelty claim is presented as fact."},"G6":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Separate problem and intervention falsifiers distinguish whether console competition causes errors from whether the proposed interface change improves outcomes."},"G7":{"status":"PASS","reason":"Authority is assigned, initial testing is confined to a simulator, safety-critical controls and alarms are excluded from hiding, and halt and rollback conditions are explicit."}},"scores":{"structural_fit":{"score":4,"reason":"The proposal uses deliberate, protected, interpretable absence as the active intervention rather than treating minimalism or generic emphasis as the solution."},"domain_fidelity":{"score":4,"reason":"The mapping preserves robotics-specific needs including continuous telemetry, freshness, connectivity, operating mode, permissions, safety state, and rapid control recovery."},"causal_plausibility":{"score":3,"reason":"Reducing visual competition plausibly improves detection and interpretation, but dynamic hiding could also reduce peripheral awareness or introduce transition costs that require empirical testing."},"component_translation":{"score":4,"reason":"All supplied components receive distinct operational realizations, including boundaries, reintroduction triggers, effect tests, context preservation, and accessibility safeguards."},"adversarial_survival":{"score":4,"reason":"The candidate identifies credible rival causes, the static-composition analogy break, dense-display benefits for experts, and multiple ways the intervention could worsen performance."},"reframing_gain":{"score":3,"reason":"Protected absence reframes the console from a permanently filled dashboard into a state-dependent action surface, though related decluttering and focus-mode ideas are already familiar interface patterns."},"practicality_testability":{"score":3,"reason":"The simulator crossover design names a comparator, matched incidents, relevant outcomes, and rollback criteria, but operational thresholds and situation-awareness measurement remain unspecified."},"expected_value_risk":{"score":3,"reason":"The potential benefit is meaningful and the first test is low exposure, while eventual deployment still carries material risks from hidden information, false reassurance, and adaptive transitions."},"novelty_evidence":{"score":0,"reason":"Prior art is explicitly unsearched, so distinctiveness beyond existing alarm-management, supervisory-interface, and context-sensitive display approaches is unsupported."}},"weighted_total":85,"disposition":"DEEP_RESEARCH","fabrication_findings":[],"weak_dimensions":["novelty_evidence"],"actionable_critique":[{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"The evaluation protocol lacks prespecified acceptance thresholds and a concrete measure of retained situation awareness.","repair":"Before execution, define outcome measures, equivalence or non-inferiority bounds for control recovery and situation awareness, and decision rules for advancement.","evidence_boundary":"These protocol details can be specified prospectively; no favorable effect should be inferred before matched simulator results exist."},{"priority":"MEDIUM","issue":"Distinctiveness from established supervisory-control and alarm-management interface practices is unknown.","repair":"Conduct a bounded prior-art review covering alarm shelving, adaptive displays, ecological interface design, focus modes, and context-sensitive control presentation.","evidence_boundary":"The current record supports structural novelty only as an unverified possibility, not as an evidence-backed claim."}],"repairs":[],"improvement_attribution":{"kind":"NONE","reason":"This is an original attempt with no prior problem or causal-lever identifier and no registered repair history against which improvement can be attributed."},"trajectory_replacement":false,"arm_guess":"MECHANISM_PACKET","recommendation":"SUCCESS","tester_summary":"The candidate is structurally coherent, domain-aware, falsifiable, and safely testable. Its principal unresolved issue is novelty evidence, with empirical causal support appropriately deferred to simulator validation."}