{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp04_retrieval_first_paired20_20260802","cell_id":"deadweight_loss_reduction__astronomy_astrophysics","hypothesis_id":"H2","search_queries":["astronomy archive proposal data discovery recommend datasets research question existing observations","telescope proposal archive duplicate observations policy tool ESO HST JWST ALMA","astronomy science platform archive data discovery analysis compatibility calibration compute","astronomical archive data recommendation system project dataset matching","IVOA Recommendation ObsCore 1.1 Observation Data Model Core Components 2021","IVOA Recommendation DataLink 1.1 2023","patent scientific dataset recommendation research project matching archive","ESASky science driven discovery portal multi mission archive paper"],"sources":[{"source_id":"S1","title":"JWST Observation Duplication Checking","publisher":"Space Telescope Science Institute","url":"https://jwst-docs.stsci.edu/jwst-opportunities-and-policies/jwst-general-science-policies/jwst-observation-duplication-checking","source_class":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["JWST proposers must check proposed observations against approved and previously executed observations before submission and remove or justify potential duplication.","STScI provides archive and duplication-search tools and performs an additional staff check after proposal acceptance.","This places archive-versus-new-observation checking directly inside the nominated workflow boundary."]},{"source_id":"S2","title":"ESO Science Archive","publisher":"European Southern Observatory","url":"https://www.eso.org/public/science/archive/","source_class":"OFFICIAL_ORGANIZATION_DATA","claims_supported":["The ESO archive provides raw, calibration, and processed science-ready data, including jointly searchable data from multiple ESO facilities and ALMA.","ESO reports that almost 40% of its papers in 2022 used archival data and 24% relied exclusively on archival data.","Access rights, calibration availability, processed products, and cross-facility reuse are therefore established operational components."]},{"source_id":"S3","title":"Programmatic Access","publisher":"European Southern Observatory","url":"https://www.eso.org/cms/eso-data/programmatic-access.html","source_class":"OFFICIAL_PRODUCT_DOCUMENTATION","claims_supported":["ESO exposes ALMA, Paranal, La Silla, and APEX observation metadata through an integrated ObsCore service.","Authenticated queries and DataLink calls support permission-sensitive metadata and proprietary files.","DataLink associates observations with calibration files, derived products, provenance-related files, and processing services, while SODA supports server-side data subsetting."]},{"source_id":"S4","title":"Observation Data Model Core Components and its Implementation in the Table Access Protocol Version 1.1","publisher":"International Virtual Observatory Alliance","url":"https://ivoa.net/documents/ObsCore/20170509/REC-ObsCore-v1.1-20170509.pdf","source_class":"STANDARD","claims_supported":["ObsCore standardizes queryable metadata for global discovery across astronomical archives.","Its fields cover spatial, spectral, and temporal characteristics, facility and instrument, calibration level, data rights, access information, and estimated download size.","The standard supplies much of the metadata substrate needed for compatibility filtering, although it does not infer scientific fitness from a project description."]},{"source_id":"S5","title":"IVOA DataLink Version 1.1","publisher":"International Virtual Observatory Alliance","url":"https://www.ivoa.net/documents/DataLink/20231215/REC-DataLink-1.1.pdf","source_class":"STANDARD","claims_supported":["DataLink standardizes links from discovery records to dataset files, detailed metadata, related resources, provenance entities, and services that operate on data.","It overlaps the proposed exposure of usable derivatives and operational requirements after a candidate observation is found."]},{"source_id":"S6","title":"Scientific Dataset Discovery via Topic-level Recommendation","publisher":"arXiv","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.03399","source_class":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","claims_supported":["The research formulates dataset discovery as recommending datasets for a query representing a research project linked to papers.","It embeds projects and datasets in a shared topic space and ranks relevant datasets, establishing the general project-to-dataset recommendation mechanism."]},{"source_id":"S7","title":"The archives, a scientific treasure trove","publisher":"European Space Agency","url":"https://www.esa.int/About_Us/ESAC/The_archives_a_scientific_treasure_trove","source_class":"OFFICIAL_ORGANIZATION_DATA","claims_supported":["ESA operates ESASky as a science-driven discovery portal spanning many ESA and partner astronomy missions.","The portal provides an established cross-mission entry point for finding existing observations relevant to celestial objects."]}],"proximity":"SUBSTANTIAL_COLLISION","closest_analogues":[{"name":"JWST proposal-stage duplication checking","similarity":"It operates at the same archive-versus-new-observation decision point, searches existing and planned observations, and is explicitly intended to prevent unnecessary new observations.","remaining_difference":"It identifies potential technical duplication and leaves scientific suitability judgment to proposers rather than ranking datasets against a complete project specification.","source_ids":["S1"]},{"name":"ESO and ESASky federated archival-discovery infrastructure","similarity":"It exposes cross-facility or cross-mission coverage, instrument metadata, calibration resources, processed products, access controls, and server-side services needed to assess reuse.","remaining_difference":"The documented interfaces remain query- or target-driven and do not clearly convert project intent into a ranked scientific-compatibility score or track displaced observing hours.","source_ids":["S2","S3","S7"]},{"name":"IVOA discovery standards combined with topic-level dataset recommendation","similarity":"ObsCore and DataLink provide interoperable astronomy metadata and operational links, while the recommendation research already maps a research-project representation to ranked datasets.","remaining_difference":"The sources do not document an operational astronomy service combining these elements inside telescope-proposal preparation with calibration, rights, compute-burden scoring, and substitution evaluation.","source_ids":["S4","S5","S6"]}],"overlapping_components":["Proposal-stage checks against archived and planned observations","Cross-archive and cross-mission dataset discovery","Project-to-dataset relevance ranking","Spatial, spectral, temporal, facility, and instrument compatibility metadata","Calibration-level and calibration-file discovery","Data-rights and authenticated-access metadata","Science-ready and derived-product access","Estimated data-volume metadata and server-side processing services","Provenance-related links","Avoidance or justification of unnecessary duplicate observations"],"remaining_contrastive_claim":"Unlike established duplication checks, archive portals, interoperability standards, and general dataset recommenders, the nominated treatment would automatically translate an astronomy project specification into ranked cross-archive matches that jointly assess scientific coverage, calibration suitability, rights, and compute burden and would measurably reduce requested new observing hours without increasing abandonment.","claim_falsifier":"A direct source documenting an operational astronomy service that ingests proposal or project requirements, ranks archived observations across repositories using substantially all of coverage, calibration suitability, access rights, and compute requirements, is used before telescope-time submission, and has evaluated observing-hour substitution or an equivalent reuse outcome would falsify the remaining claim.","problem_support":"MODERATE","recommendation":"RESEARCH","world_novelty_boundary":"Within this bounded eight-query search, novelty was not found in duplication checking, archive discovery, metadata federation, access and calibration screening, processing-service exposure, or project-to-dataset recommendation separately; any remaining novelty is confined to their astronomy-specific integration and causal evaluation against requested observing hours."}