{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp04_retrieval_first_paired20_20260802","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__economics_finance","considered_ids":["H1","H2","H5"],"selected_id":"H2","dispositions":[{"hypothesis_id":"H1","lane":"RESEARCH","reason":"The critic supports a real intraday-liquidity problem and identifies a falsifiable residual, but the proposed policy bundles transition-operator estimation, three coupled risk drivers, modal allocation, and a demanding lead-time benchmark, making the distinction less narrow and validation-heavy than H2."},{"hypothesis_id":"H2","lane":"FINALIST","reason":"The critic directly establishes creditor coordination and holdouts as recognized restructuring problems while locating adjacent but distinct prior art in renegotiation centrality, restructuring sequencing, and spectral financial-network targeting. The residual is narrow and testable: whether restructuring-specific spectral consent sensitivity improves next-action selection over claim-size or legal-power baselines and reduces consent rounds."},{"hypothesis_id":"H5","lane":"COLLISION","reason":"The critic finds substantial collision at both execution and analytical boundaries, including market-impact-aware partial liquidation, spectral fire-sale models, constrained sale optimization, and factor-based margin workflows. Although a narrow cross-account spectral controller with residual governance remains, the evidence characterizes novelty as confined to an integration of near-complete prior components, so it is better routed to collision than selected."}],"selection_reason":"H2 offers the cleanest differentiated opportunity: a recognizable creditor-consent bottleneck, direct source support for both the problem and adjacent practices, and a prospective intervention rule that can be falsified against explicit operational baselines without relying on INDETERMINATE novelty evidence."}