{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp04_retrieval_first_paired20_20260802","cell_id":"layer_decay_and_expiration_management__education_pedagogy","considered_ids":["H1","H3"],"selected_id":null,"dispositions":[{"hypothesis_id":"H1","lane":"RESEARCH","reason":"The critic classifies the treatment as ESTABLISHED_PRACTICE, making it ineligible for the differentiated-opportunity tournament. Its semantic-staleness residual is narrow and falsifiable but supported only by bounded non-retrieval, so it remains a research question."},{"hypothesis_id":"H3","lane":"COLLISION","reason":"The core expiration, suppression, review, renewal, and context-boundary mechanism substantially collides with documented knowledge-base and course-rerun practices. The remaining statement is chiefly an exact-combination non-retrieval claim rather than a supported, repairable treatment distinction."}],"selection_reason":"No hypothesis qualifies: H1 is established practice, while H3 has a substantial collision without a sufficiently supported material residual claim."}